Does anyone know if there is a correction set for the Academy Ontos suspenion ? Thanks in advance for any help!
[:::]
Rich M.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Ontos
Posted: Saturday, February 18, 2012 - 08:13 AM UTC
chris1
Auckland, New Zealand
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 949 posts
Armorama: 139 posts
Joined: October 25, 2005
KitMaker: 949 posts
Armorama: 139 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 18, 2012 - 08:33 AM UTC
Hi Rich,
Steve Zagola did a build in a recent issue of Military Modelling.
He noted that a great deal of work would be required to correct the suspension.
While I can't scan a copy of the article at present I can track it down and let you know the issue number.
While not quite the answer you are looking hope it is of some use.
Cheers
Chris
Steve Zagola did a build in a recent issue of Military Modelling.
He noted that a great deal of work would be required to correct the suspension.
While I can't scan a copy of the article at present I can track it down and let you know the issue number.
While not quite the answer you are looking hope it is of some use.
Cheers
Chris
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 18, 2012 - 08:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The suspension is quite complex but matches what info I have on the vehicle
Cookie Sewell
On Network54, the correction for the suspension is laid out.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47209/message/1293633267/ONTOS+suspension+headaches
Hope this helps.
Posted: Monday, February 20, 2012 - 04:52 AM UTC
Hey Guys,
Thanks for the response. I saw the article by Steven Zaloga, but not the one by Cookie Sewell. I will definitely check it out. I was hoping some AM company would have come out with a correction set by now, but may have to try and fix it after checking out Cookies article...thanks again guys!!
Thanks for the response. I saw the article by Steven Zaloga, but not the one by Cookie Sewell. I will definitely check it out. I was hoping some AM company would have come out with a correction set by now, but may have to try and fix it after checking out Cookies article...thanks again guys!!
bat-213
Canada
Joined: December 30, 2011
KitMaker: 902 posts
Armorama: 788 posts
Joined: December 30, 2011
KitMaker: 902 posts
Armorama: 788 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 05, 2012 - 07:11 PM UTC
hi guys,does anyone make an interior set for the ontos?
thanks guys
thanks guys
zapper
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 05, 2012 - 10:55 PM UTC
Yes, Verlinden makes one.
Cheers,
/E
Cheers,
/E
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Friday, April 06, 2012 - 07:03 AM UTC
Here's what I found on one parked down the road from me.
The bottom of the hull to the ground should be 14.5" at the front, and 16" at the rear (this track has the powerpac in it, but is dry without any ammo inside). The suspension mounts for the arms are in the wrong location in the kit, and they are not all inline with each other if memory is right. Might be off about .060". Now this track has slightly different tracks than the ones in the kit, but have seen both styles. Fender higth to ground was pretty much the same as the book. Seems like I found an error in the kits nose, but still not all that hard to fix (there is a compound angle in the front nose with a secondary angle at the bottom). The kit's shocks don't look right, but also see that I failed to get the over length of them, so I forsee another trip down when it gets dry again.
To really confirm the front end, I'll have to assemble it to be sure.
gary
The bottom of the hull to the ground should be 14.5" at the front, and 16" at the rear (this track has the powerpac in it, but is dry without any ammo inside). The suspension mounts for the arms are in the wrong location in the kit, and they are not all inline with each other if memory is right. Might be off about .060". Now this track has slightly different tracks than the ones in the kit, but have seen both styles. Fender higth to ground was pretty much the same as the book. Seems like I found an error in the kits nose, but still not all that hard to fix (there is a compound angle in the front nose with a secondary angle at the bottom). The kit's shocks don't look right, but also see that I failed to get the over length of them, so I forsee another trip down when it gets dry again.
To really confirm the front end, I'll have to assemble it to be sure.
gary
bat-213
Canada
Joined: December 30, 2011
KitMaker: 902 posts
Armorama: 788 posts
Joined: December 30, 2011
KitMaker: 902 posts
Armorama: 788 posts
Posted: Friday, April 06, 2012 - 02:48 PM UTC
thanks for the info Zapper