Bulid:
Shot at 2012-04-29
Shot at 2012-04-29
Shot at 2012-04-29
Shot at 2012-05-01
Shot at 2012-05-01
Shot at 2012-05-23
Shot at 2012-05-23
Shot at 2012-05-23
And done:
Shot at 2012-06-07
Shot at 2012-06-07
Shot at 2012-06-07
Shot at 2012-06-07
Shot at 2012-06-07
Hosted by Darren Baker
Stug IV early - 1:35 - Academy
Corporal_PL
Wojewodztwo Lubuskie, Poland
Joined: November 01, 2011
KitMaker: 116 posts
Armorama: 109 posts
Joined: November 01, 2011
KitMaker: 116 posts
Armorama: 109 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 16, 2012 - 06:05 AM UTC
SdAufKla
South Carolina, United States
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 16, 2012 - 09:14 AM UTC
Marcin,
I like it!
Maybe the antennas are a little too thick and "heavy" looking, but other than that, I really do like the way this looks.
Thanks for sharing.
I like it!
Maybe the antennas are a little too thick and "heavy" looking, but other than that, I really do like the way this looks.
Thanks for sharing.
Tanksami
Victoria, Australia
Joined: August 06, 2011
KitMaker: 1,314 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Joined: August 06, 2011
KitMaker: 1,314 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 16, 2012 - 11:16 PM UTC
Hi Marcin,
It looks really good love what you did to the side skirts!!
Agree with Mike about the antennans, came out really nice
Cheers Mike
It looks really good love what you did to the side skirts!!
Agree with Mike about the antennans, came out really nice
Cheers Mike
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 17, 2012 - 01:21 AM UTC
Nice work. One other tiny thing I'd do is to rest the butt stock of the MG 42 on the loader's hatch and even lean the shield back as if it were awaiting an infantry man to use it. There was no mechanism to keep the MG shield upright besides hooking it to the front hatch. If the hatches were buttoned up, the MG shield would lie flat. Hope this makes sense.
Posted: Sunday, June 17, 2012 - 02:58 AM UTC
Nice looking build, thanks for sharing.
SdAufKla
South Carolina, United States
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 17, 2012 - 08:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
... There was no mechanism to keep the MG shield upright besides hooking it to the front hatch. If the hatches were buttoned up, the MG shield would lie flat....
I didn't want to say anything about that since it's kind of too late maybe with the build for all intents finished, but it is a very good point.
This is quite a common error with StuG III/IV builds, too. Just about every "closed top" StuG III/IV build shows the MG shield in the incorrect vertical but un-supported configuration.
It's too bad that the kit makers don't ever really say anything in the instructions about how the sheild and hatch should be arranged.
Petro
Connecticut, United States
Joined: November 02, 2003
KitMaker: 984 posts
Armorama: 846 posts
Joined: November 02, 2003
KitMaker: 984 posts
Armorama: 846 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 17, 2012 - 09:04 AM UTC
Excellent looking build.