_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Modern - USA
Modern Armor, AFVs, and Support vehicles.
Hosted by Darren Baker
M48A1 in camo
bankmannl
Visit this Community
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: October 31, 2006
KitMaker: 649 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Posted: Friday, July 27, 2012 - 01:07 AM UTC
Hi guys,

Just take a look at this link !
Artictic freedom or reality ??
I mean, the M48a1 went out of action somewhere in the 60's or were rebuilt into other M48 versions.





http://www.williammaloney.com/Aviation/AlleghenyArmsAndArmorMuseum/M48A1PattonTank/index.htm
retiredyank
Visit this Community
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Friday, July 27, 2012 - 01:12 AM UTC
Very interesting. As many M60s as there are around, I could easily see this as reality. There may be some countries that have the basic M60 still operating, but don't have the funds to upgrade it.
Mustanger
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: July 06, 2012
KitMaker: 94 posts
Armorama: 55 posts
Posted: Friday, July 27, 2012 - 06:09 AM UTC
[quote]Hi guys,

Just take a look at this link !
Artictic freedom or reality ??
I mean, the M48a1 went out of action somewhere in the 60's or were rebuilt into other M48 versions.

There were still a few M48A5's in National Guard service when the MERC paint schemes came on the scene in late 1975. So, yeah it was not unusual to see camo on M48's, although all the ones pictured have non-standard patterns. But then that was typical of the National Guard, too. Heck, the National Guard still had M42 Dusters in active service until 1988. I was adjutant of the last battalion to have them before it became a Stinger battalion.
bankmannl
Visit this Community
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: October 31, 2006
KitMaker: 649 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 28, 2012 - 03:30 AM UTC
Hi guys,

Yes, I know that the M48a5 was used into the eighties.
BUT THIS IS A M48A1 ( LOOK AT THE BACKSIDE )
THAT'S A REALLY OLD TANK FOR CAMO !!!!



tanknick22
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: February 19, 2009
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 1,100 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 28, 2012 - 02:44 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Hi guys,

Yes, I know that the M48a5 was used into the eighties.
BUT THIS IS A M48A1 ( LOOK AT THE BACKSIDE )
THAT'S A REALLY OLD TANK FOR CAMO !!!!





if anything it was on display at a national guard armory there is a m75 apc on disply at a national guard armory in lumberton nj and it painted in the merc paint scheme
AgentG
Visit this Community
Nevada, United States
Joined: December 21, 2008
KitMaker: 1,109 posts
Armorama: 1,095 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 - 04:15 AM UTC
It's sitting next to a Russian vehicle, BMP? maybe. I'm thinking OPFOR camo.

G
rfbaer
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: June 12, 2007
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,696 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 - 06:05 AM UTC
Jordanian?
Mustanger
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: July 06, 2012
KitMaker: 94 posts
Armorama: 55 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 - 02:13 PM UTC
Good thought ... I think Jordan used a green and sand scheme in the mid-60's
redleg12
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: March 11, 2007
KitMaker: 872 posts
Armorama: 831 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 29, 2012 - 10:42 PM UTC
Ge, I think the age does not matter as I am sure somewhere in service there were old M48s when camo was introduced. But the pattern looks like it was done for a display, IMO. If it was the original there would be bumper markings. Lastly the paint was not that good in the 70s to last this long outdoors. The M48 would be in much worse shape than it is.

So to answer your question, no I don't think the pattern is real unless as postulated it was brought back after use by another country.

Rounds Complete!!
bat-213
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: December 30, 2011
KitMaker: 902 posts
Armorama: 788 posts
Posted: Monday, July 30, 2012 - 10:11 AM UTC
very cool pics and viedo.thanks for shareing.
 _GOTOTOP