About 20 some odd years ago I did this in 1/87.
So once Revell came out with the M2/M3 Bradley (kit 03143)
I decided to try it withe the Hammerhead from ESCI's M901.
This is what I started with.
Here is where I am when I decide to take a break.
well it's after Midnight so I'll call it quits for now.
Hosted by Darren Baker
M901A2 (1/72 What If)
CPL-Overby
Maryland, United States
Joined: September 12, 2005
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 192 posts
Joined: September 12, 2005
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 192 posts
Posted: Friday, August 31, 2012 - 04:58 PM UTC
tread_geek
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 23, 2008
KitMaker: 2,847 posts
Armorama: 2,667 posts
Joined: March 23, 2008
KitMaker: 2,847 posts
Armorama: 2,667 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2012 - 03:47 AM UTC
A somewhat interesting and definitely plausible concept but with Bradley's already mounting two TOW missiles it kind of seems like a step backwards. Then again, one can't deny that in more than a few circumstances we've seen vehicles modified or reconfigured to suit a particular foreign armed forces specifications. I'll be curious to keep an eye on this one and see how it matures.
Cheers,
Jan
Cheers,
Jan
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2012 - 05:44 AM UTC
Quoted Text
...with Bradley's already mounting two TOW missiles it kind of seems like a step backwards.
Exactly what I was thinking, why???
Especially when the TOW targeting head is crappy 1970s technology that seldom worked.
The closest thing to it is the smaller, M113-based AIFV TOW.
CPL-Overby
Maryland, United States
Joined: September 12, 2005
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 192 posts
Joined: September 12, 2005
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 192 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2012 - 08:52 AM UTC
Quoted Text
A somewhat interesting and definitely plausible concept but with Bradley's already mounting two TOW missiles it kind of seems like a step backwards. Then again, one can't deny that in more than a few circumstances we've seen vehicles modified or reconfigured to suit a particular foreign armed forces specifications. I'll be curious to keep an eye on this one and see how it matures.
Cheers,
Jan
Thanks Jan,
The whole Idea behind this ...is this.....
I concieved this over 20 years ago.
You know...back when it was still the "Cold War".
The main difference between this and a Bradley is this.....
the Bradley "Is Not" an Offencive Platform...it "Is" a Recon/Scout and Battle Taxi.
The M901 "Is" an "Offencive" Platform.....meant to go out and "Hunt" Armor, to hind in "Ambush" then strike.
I built these models back when I used armor models to teach "Armored Vehicle Recognition" (I was an E-3 back then),
once in a while "Higher-Ups" would come and sit in my class.
I hand them Binos. point to a Numbered Stake and ask what vehicle was placed there. Then they would look over all my models...."they" liked my "concept" vehicles.
But remember...this was back in the 80's.
I thought the purpose was to enjoy myself,
I did title this as a "what if" after all.
spacewolfdad
England - West Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: May 23, 2010
KitMaker: 642 posts
Armorama: 593 posts
Joined: May 23, 2010
KitMaker: 642 posts
Armorama: 593 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2012 - 11:19 AM UTC
Hi Ken,
You carry on enjoying yourself, I am in awe of the clean removal of the 'lid' with a razor blade - awesome.
All the best,
Paul
You carry on enjoying yourself, I am in awe of the clean removal of the 'lid' with a razor blade - awesome.
All the best,
Paul
CPL-Overby
Maryland, United States
Joined: September 12, 2005
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 192 posts
Joined: September 12, 2005
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 192 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 01, 2012 - 11:55 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi Ken,
You carry on enjoying yourself, I am in awe of the clean removal of the 'lid' with a razor blade - awesome.
All the best,
Paul
Hi Paul,
That top is Thick to....
Each line took about 40 strokes with the razor.
I was very nervous the whole time.
CPL-Overby
Maryland, United States
Joined: September 12, 2005
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 192 posts
Joined: September 12, 2005
KitMaker: 190 posts
Armorama: 192 posts
Posted: Monday, September 03, 2012 - 12:25 AM UTC
Well "inspite" of Nay Sayers on weather or not this is a viable vehicle ....
The progress contenues
Here it is with a new roof:
Here are the parts from ESCI's Hammerhead:
Now, the TC hatch on the Hammerhead is molded closed, as shown here:
So I have taken the parts from ESCI's M113, Namely the TC hatch, so that I can add it to the Hammerhead mount:
I took the Hemmerhead mount, and sanded down the hatch till the M113 TC hatch fit to it:
I will add a MG ring and look for an M60/M60D for mounting to it.
If any questions, feel free to reply.
The progress contenues
Here it is with a new roof:
Here are the parts from ESCI's Hammerhead:
Now, the TC hatch on the Hammerhead is molded closed, as shown here:
So I have taken the parts from ESCI's M113, Namely the TC hatch, so that I can add it to the Hammerhead mount:
I took the Hemmerhead mount, and sanded down the hatch till the M113 TC hatch fit to it:
I will add a MG ring and look for an M60/M60D for mounting to it.
If any questions, feel free to reply.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Monday, September 03, 2012 - 12:34 AM UTC
Why are you updating two identical threads? You only need one.