Hi guys,
Please look at this link !
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BEeVsYDNtB4/TdFC8lt46-I/AAAAAAAACO0/OUVQHleI-zY/s1600/M48%2BPatton%2BTank%2BWallpapers%2B%25282%2529.jpg
Artistic freedom or is this realy a M48A1 in Merdc colors ?
Extra tension wheel, different backside !!!!!
If so, does anyone know where this photo was taken ?
Or to what unit this tank belonged ?
Gé
Hosted by Darren Baker
M48A1 Merdc
bankmannl
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: October 31, 2006
KitMaker: 649 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Joined: October 31, 2006
KitMaker: 649 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 - 11:41 PM UTC
MGunner
Kentucky, United States
Joined: May 27, 2010
KitMaker: 51 posts
Armorama: 48 posts
Joined: May 27, 2010
KitMaker: 51 posts
Armorama: 48 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 - 12:19 AM UTC
I'm no expert on post war U.S. armor but isn't that a M-47 ?
zapper
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 - 10:31 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I'm no expert on post war U.S. armor but isn't that a M-47 ?
Nope, it's a M48. Regarding the MERDEC I'd say it's just a museum paint job but perhaps someone can prove me wrong.
/E
jon_a_its
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: April 29, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 1,137 posts
Joined: April 29, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 1,137 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 - 11:23 PM UTC
I have a vague recollection that the M47/early M48a0 had the extra idler behind the rear roadwheel, someone correct me?
I can't tell if the rear deck is petrol or diesel, but there isn't a rear extension to the rear plate.
Turret is M48a3/a5?
May be a Franken-jobbie?
I can't tell if the rear deck is petrol or diesel, but there isn't a rear extension to the rear plate.
Turret is M48a3/a5?
May be a Franken-jobbie?
bankmannl
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: October 31, 2006
KitMaker: 649 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Joined: October 31, 2006
KitMaker: 649 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 - 11:30 PM UTC
Hi guys,
I found out that this picture was taken at the Fort Snelling museum.
I think it's a M48a1 because there is NO increased engine-deck instead you will see the exhaust deflector under the stowage baskett !!
Gé
I found out that this picture was taken at the Fort Snelling museum.
I think it's a M48a1 because there is NO increased engine-deck instead you will see the exhaust deflector under the stowage baskett !!
Gé
Posted: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 - 11:31 PM UTC
I am no tank expert, but I am going to throw out there that this has to be an A-3 or better. I THINK that the commanders cupola and the two round things top middle of the sides of the turret are for gyrostabilization of the gun. I didnt think the M-48 had gyrostabilization.... anyone support or dispute this?
AgentG
Nevada, United States
Joined: December 21, 2008
KitMaker: 1,109 posts
Armorama: 1,095 posts
Joined: December 21, 2008
KitMaker: 1,109 posts
Armorama: 1,095 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 20, 2012 - 02:23 AM UTC
The exhaust deflector and small idler say M48A nothing. Probably the museum's paint job, but these could have been in the Guard long enough to see MERDC?
G
G
TheGreatPumpkin
Vendor
New Jersey, United States
Joined: April 20, 2009
KitMaker: 690 posts
Armorama: 672 posts
Joined: April 20, 2009
KitMaker: 690 posts
Armorama: 672 posts
Posted: Thursday, September 20, 2012 - 05:00 AM UTC
Guys,
IIRC, the NJNG reverted to M48A1's in the 1970's after turning in their M48A3's. This was during the conversion of the A3's to A5 standards (they later fielded A5's in the late 80's-early 90's). This could be one of those tanks from another state's NG?
Regards,
Georg
IIRC, the NJNG reverted to M48A1's in the 1970's after turning in their M48A3's. This was during the conversion of the A3's to A5 standards (they later fielded A5's in the late 80's-early 90's). This could be one of those tanks from another state's NG?
Regards,
Georg