Makes lots of room on your modelling desk, there is a real big Tiger coming from Hobby Boss.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
NEWS
Big Tiger from Hobby BossPosted: Friday, October 12, 2012 - 08:52 AM UTC
Byrden
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Friday, October 12, 2012 - 09:46 AM UTC
Interior?
Posted: Friday, October 12, 2012 - 10:45 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Interior?
No word yet, but that would be nice.
acebatau
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 10, 2008
KitMaker: 730 posts
Armorama: 616 posts
Joined: February 10, 2008
KitMaker: 730 posts
Armorama: 616 posts
Posted: Friday, October 12, 2012 - 11:17 AM UTC
I would get them both!
Spiderfrommars
Milano, Italy
Joined: July 13, 2010
KitMaker: 3,845 posts
Armorama: 3,543 posts
Joined: July 13, 2010
KitMaker: 3,845 posts
Armorama: 3,543 posts
Posted: Friday, October 12, 2012 - 06:28 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextInterior?
No word yet, but that would be nice.
Well a Tiger in 16 scale with any interior might look toylike...
When I've read the rumors about, I thought it was in 35 scale
I'm far more interested in their latest T-26
Thanks for spotting
Teaker11
California, United States
Joined: July 02, 2009
KitMaker: 962 posts
Armorama: 786 posts
Joined: July 02, 2009
KitMaker: 962 posts
Armorama: 786 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 14, 2012 - 12:46 PM UTC
Trumpeter has the 182, is there a difference in 181?
Tiger_213
California, United States
Joined: August 10, 2012
KitMaker: 1,510 posts
Armorama: 1,443 posts
Joined: August 10, 2012
KitMaker: 1,510 posts
Armorama: 1,443 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 25, 2012 - 04:37 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Trumpeter has the 182, is there a difference in 181?
182 is a Ausf. H model, early production. 181 is the later production, re-designated 'Tiger' as opposed to the Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf. H.
Any word on price?
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 25, 2012 - 04:57 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextTrumpeter has the 182, is there a difference in 181?
182 is a Ausf. H model, early production. 181 is the later production, re-designated 'Tiger' as opposed to the Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf. H.
Huh?... Sd.Kfz. 182 is Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf.B "King Tiger". Sd.Kfz. 181 is Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf.H or E "Tiger". Two completely different tanks.
AFVFan
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 25, 2012 - 05:07 PM UTC
Chris - you did mean "VI", not "IV", right? Darn typos!
As for the subject at hand, all I can say is "oh....joy... " . There's so much armor out there that either doesn't exist in kit form, or only exists as a very expensive resin model, or a poorly rendered kit that I just can't get excited by yet another Tiger.
As for the subject at hand, all I can say is "oh....joy... " . There's so much armor out there that either doesn't exist in kit form, or only exists as a very expensive resin model, or a poorly rendered kit that I just can't get excited by yet another Tiger.
pzcreations
Georgia, United States
Joined: May 24, 2006
KitMaker: 2,106 posts
Armorama: 1,116 posts
Joined: May 24, 2006
KitMaker: 2,106 posts
Armorama: 1,116 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2012 - 12:59 AM UTC
Sweet! I hope this one will be good enough to actually say the Tamiya kit is now outdated
SDavies
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: January 09, 2010
KitMaker: 979 posts
Armorama: 959 posts
Joined: January 09, 2010
KitMaker: 979 posts
Armorama: 959 posts
Posted: Friday, October 26, 2012 - 01:56 AM UTC
A 1/16th Tiger with Interior, I really need that model as long as its not too expensive !
Tiger_213
California, United States
Joined: August 10, 2012
KitMaker: 1,510 posts
Armorama: 1,443 posts
Joined: August 10, 2012
KitMaker: 1,510 posts
Armorama: 1,443 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 - 11:09 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextQuoted TextTrumpeter has the 182, is there a difference in 181?
182 is a Ausf. H model, early production. 181 is the later production, re-designated 'Tiger' as opposed to the Panzerkampfwagen IV Ausf. H.
Huh?... Sd.Kfz. 182 is Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf.B "King Tiger". Sd.Kfz. 181 is Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf.H or E "Tiger". Two completely different tanks.
Pawel,
Yes....I should know that! It was very late when I wrote that. I knew about the different designation for the Tiger I and made a bad connection between the new designation and the next generation of Tiger. VERY stupid of me.
Bob,
Quoted Text
Yes, another late-night mistake.Chris - you did mean "VI", not "IV", right? Darn typos!
Posted: Thursday, November 01, 2012 - 03:41 AM UTC
Quoted Text
A 1/16th Tiger with Interior, I really need that model as long as its not too expensive !
Would love if they released two versions ... one with, and one without. Would keep all happy and be more afordable for those who only want the actual tank.
vanhall
Groningen, Netherlands
Joined: January 23, 2007
KitMaker: 406 posts
Armorama: 391 posts
Joined: January 23, 2007
KitMaker: 406 posts
Armorama: 391 posts
Posted: Friday, November 09, 2012 - 01:19 AM UTC
I've seen the kit for pre-order at 2 German online shops.
One quoting a retail price of 70euro and a Jan'13 release, and the other 73euro with a Feb'13 release.
For that sort of money I doubt the kit will be coming with an interior.
One quoting a retail price of 70euro and a Jan'13 release, and the other 73euro with a Feb'13 release.
For that sort of money I doubt the kit will be coming with an interior.
C_JACQUEMONT
Loire-Atlantique, France
Joined: October 09, 2004
KitMaker: 2,433 posts
Armorama: 2,325 posts
Joined: October 09, 2004
KitMaker: 2,433 posts
Armorama: 2,325 posts
Posted: Friday, November 09, 2012 - 08:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Sweet! I hope this one will be good enough to actually say the Tamiya kit is now outdated
Apples and oranges. Tamiya's is an early version and HobbyBoss announced a mid production version.
What is surprising is the low price, even if an interior isn't included, I've seen German online shops quoting a price between 60 and 75€!!!!
To put this in perspective, this 1/16th scale kit is in about the same price range as CyberHobby's latest 1/35 Otto Carius Tiger I (probably without the Zimmerit though).
Cheers,
Christophe
Headhunter506
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Posted: Friday, November 09, 2012 - 12:46 PM UTC
Der Sockelshop is offering pre-orders for 59.95 Euros. This price is good until 12 November.
Tiger_213
California, United States
Joined: August 10, 2012
KitMaker: 1,510 posts
Armorama: 1,443 posts
Joined: August 10, 2012
KitMaker: 1,510 posts
Armorama: 1,443 posts
Posted: Friday, November 09, 2012 - 09:32 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I've seen the kit for pre-order at 2 German online shops.
One quoting a retail price of 70euro and a Jan'13 release, and the other 73euro with a Feb'13 release.
For that sort of money I doubt the kit will be coming with an interior.
Completely agree, or HobbyBoss is feeling unbelievably kind! For under a 100$ USD it's not bad, just wish they'd bother with the insides too.
Headhunter506
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 10, 2012 - 04:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Completely agree, or HobbyBoss is feeling unbelievably kind! For under a 100$ USD it's not bad, just wish they'd bother with the insides too.
Well, there's always David Byrden's www.tiger1.info if one feels like scratchbuilding the interior.
Byrden
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Monday, December 03, 2012 - 08:13 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Sweet! I hope this one will be good enough to actually say the Tamiya kit is now outdated
Based on the CAD images, I'd say no.
David
pzcreations
Georgia, United States
Joined: May 24, 2006
KitMaker: 2,106 posts
Armorama: 1,116 posts
Joined: May 24, 2006
KitMaker: 2,106 posts
Armorama: 1,116 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 - 12:51 PM UTC
the parts remind me of the Tamiya kit..are they?
Jagdtiger46
Missouri, United States
Joined: October 26, 2011
KitMaker: 291 posts
Armorama: 256 posts
Joined: October 26, 2011
KitMaker: 291 posts
Armorama: 256 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 - 01:36 PM UTC
With or without interior, I want one.
Posted: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 - 01:59 PM UTC
I've yet to see reviews. Here's the box contents, from the Hobby Search site:
http://www.1999.co.jp/eng/10208803
I don't see any interior parts. It has individual track links, and with pins showed in the pic, I would guess it would be workable (?).
The Hobby Boss site states "... kit is a simplified version consists of over 460 parts". Is it just the translation or are they saying there's a more detailed version in the works?
The kit appeals to me -- it's static, and I'm not much into interiors anyways. I am sure there will be inaccuracies that may be corrected to a degree one may wish to.
Having a low part count, a very good price-point for the scale (US$80 at Hobby Easy) -- why not? As long as it's not a nightmare build -- i.e. warped tubs, gaps that need a whole tube of putty, I'd go for this.
Cheers,
Tat
http://www.1999.co.jp/eng/10208803
I don't see any interior parts. It has individual track links, and with pins showed in the pic, I would guess it would be workable (?).
The Hobby Boss site states "... kit is a simplified version consists of over 460 parts". Is it just the translation or are they saying there's a more detailed version in the works?
The kit appeals to me -- it's static, and I'm not much into interiors anyways. I am sure there will be inaccuracies that may be corrected to a degree one may wish to.
Having a low part count, a very good price-point for the scale (US$80 at Hobby Easy) -- why not? As long as it's not a nightmare build -- i.e. warped tubs, gaps that need a whole tube of putty, I'd go for this.
Cheers,
Tat
Posted: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 - 02:26 PM UTC
I'd love to get one. It'd go great with my two 1/16 T-34's (76/85). Wish a static 1/16 IS2 would show up. They'd make great door "gate guards".
Jagdtiger46
Missouri, United States
Joined: October 26, 2011
KitMaker: 291 posts
Armorama: 256 posts
Joined: October 26, 2011
KitMaker: 291 posts
Armorama: 256 posts
Posted: Friday, March 29, 2013 - 06:55 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I'd love to get one. It'd go great with my two 1/16 T-34's (76/85). Wish a static 1/16 IS2 would show up. They'd make great door "gate guards".
Agreed, a 1:16 JS-2 (or SSU-152!), would be awesome. I'd buy either one in a heartbeat.
Headhunter506
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Posted: Friday, March 29, 2013 - 09:10 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I've yet to see reviews. Here's the box contents, from the Hobby Search site:
http://www.1999.co.jp/eng/10208803
I don't see any interior parts. It has individual track links, and with pins showed in the pic, I would guess it would be workable (?).
The Hobby Boss site states "... kit is a simplified version consists of over 460 parts". Is it just the translation or are they saying there's a more detailed version in the works?
The kit appeals to me -- it's static, and I'm not much into interiors anyways. I am sure there will be inaccuracies that may be corrected to a degree one may wish to.
Having a low part count, a very good price-point for the scale (US$80 at Hobby Easy) -- why not? As long as it's not a nightmare build -- i.e. warped tubs, gaps that need a whole tube of putty, I'd go for this.
Cheers,
Tat
I recall reading that this is a static version of an RC tank, Heng Long perhaps. That would explain the "simplified version" description.