I got this off my FaceBook just a few minutes ago. It really doesn't look that bad. It's not the Dragon AIM kit, but with some tender loveing care, it could come out to be a very nice model.
Tamiya M1A2 SEP Build
Hosted by Darren Baker
Build up of Tamyia's New Abrams kit
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 01:47 AM UTC
blabla
Niedersachsen, Germany
Joined: December 02, 2006
KitMaker: 147 posts
Armorama: 142 posts
Joined: December 02, 2006
KitMaker: 147 posts
Armorama: 142 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 02:38 AM UTC
Hello,
I would say it looks like kit for a weekend with very much fun!!!! SImple oob and testing at the same time if the TUSK I and II is applicable on the Dragon for those who have one in their "store"..
But how you said, it is not the Dragon AIM or SEP kit. Toy suspension....
Cheers
I would say it looks like kit for a weekend with very much fun!!!! SImple oob and testing at the same time if the TUSK I and II is applicable on the Dragon for those who have one in their "store"..
But how you said, it is not the Dragon AIM or SEP kit. Toy suspension....
Cheers
sauceman
Ontario, Canada
Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts
Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 03:30 AM UTC
Looks really nice, might have to get one of these.
cheers
cheers
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 04:39 AM UTC
Looks like a nice kit.
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 04:47 AM UTC
i just noticed looking at the pics, that they did re-tool the upper hull:
They corrected the NBC area, lower right of pic, and added the missing rubber piece, bottom center and left.
They corrected the NBC area, lower right of pic, and added the missing rubber piece, bottom center and left.
TankSGT
New Jersey, United States
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 09:15 AM UTC
It definately has peaked my intrest. Now the price has to be right.
Tom
Tom
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 09:56 AM UTC
I agree with TankSGT, it looks pretty good, but the price has to be right.
It looks like Tamiya did a little updating, but as the others have said, it isn't up to the standard of Dragon's AIM or SEP.
It looks like Tamiya did a little updating, but as the others have said, it isn't up to the standard of Dragon's AIM or SEP.
Headhunter506
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 10:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I agree with TankSGT, it looks pretty good, but the price has to be right.
It looks like Tamiya did a little updating, but as the others have said, it isn't up to the standard of Dragon's AIM or SEP.
Dragon can'r reissue 3536 fast enough to suit me.
Recon
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: October 19, 2002
KitMaker: 1,571 posts
Armorama: 764 posts
Joined: October 19, 2002
KitMaker: 1,571 posts
Armorama: 764 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 11:01 AM UTC
My understanding is that it is the same price as their Elephant. With discounts that won't be to bad.
Mike
Mike
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 11:09 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextI agree with TankSGT, it looks pretty good, but the price has to be right.
It looks like Tamiya did a little updating, but as the others have said, it isn't up to the standard of Dragon's AIM or SEP.
Dragon can'r reissue 3536 fast enough to suit me.
Personally, I am losing faith that Dragon will reissue it. Their marketing practices can boggle the mind sometimes. Take for example the Tiger I. They have released dozens of Tiger kits and the only Early was a limited edition Cyberhobby one years ago that sold out fast and goes for a few hundred online. You'd think they would make a killing by reissuing it or reboxing it but noooooooooooo.
hugohuertas
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joined: January 26, 2007
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 1,013 posts
Joined: January 26, 2007
KitMaker: 1,024 posts
Armorama: 1,013 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 11:44 AM UTC
Quoted Text
My understanding is that it is the same price as their Elephant. With discounts that won't be to bad.
Mike
Hobbyeasy shows it for pre-order at USD 53.33
Not a cheap one, but looking at the re-issues of old 70's kits that Big T is offering lately, not a bad price at all.
Joel_W
Associate Editor
New York, United States
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
Armorama: 1,143 posts
Joined: December 04, 2010
KitMaker: 11,666 posts
Armorama: 1,143 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 11:56 AM UTC
The mid $50 range is what I would have expected.
Joel
Joel
Recon
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: October 19, 2002
KitMaker: 1,571 posts
Armorama: 764 posts
Joined: October 19, 2002
KitMaker: 1,571 posts
Armorama: 764 posts
Posted: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 11:58 AM UTC
$53 is not too bad of a price. I am sure someone will have it cheaper.
I will buy several of them. The question is what do I do with my Legend update set?
Mike
I will buy several of them. The question is what do I do with my Legend update set?
Mike
AngryDog
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: March 27, 2004
KitMaker: 1,114 posts
Armorama: 900 posts
Joined: March 27, 2004
KitMaker: 1,114 posts
Armorama: 900 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 - 04:15 AM UTC
Hmmm, for modelers like myself, will be depending on various AM kits coming out to detail this kit. As someone who believes in getting the details right or at least trying to..I won't say what I don't like about their attempt.
But I will say I really like the belly armor and I'd think the gun mantlet and that turret area would be a breeze to assemble as compared to other kits.
The horizontal surfaces on the side armor tiles seem bare for the individual tiles..which could be a good thing if one would scribe their own lines and apply the non slip texture. Legend's version has the recessed line at the edge too thick thus too close to the non slip surface if applied.
Great thing about Tamiya kits is the quality of their plastic and usual well fitting parts. So I'm definitely buying a bunch of these kits but to use with AM kits of course. However I also definitely keeping my Legend kits as well.
Thanks for the link Pete
But I will say I really like the belly armor and I'd think the gun mantlet and that turret area would be a breeze to assemble as compared to other kits.
The horizontal surfaces on the side armor tiles seem bare for the individual tiles..which could be a good thing if one would scribe their own lines and apply the non slip texture. Legend's version has the recessed line at the edge too thick thus too close to the non slip surface if applied.
Great thing about Tamiya kits is the quality of their plastic and usual well fitting parts. So I'm definitely buying a bunch of these kits but to use with AM kits of course. However I also definitely keeping my Legend kits as well.
Thanks for the link Pete
jvazquez
New Jersey, United States
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Joined: September 26, 2006
KitMaker: 857 posts
Armorama: 811 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 - 05:18 PM UTC
Looks pretty decent, but I still don't know how you're Tamiya and you go all out by creating new molds and add the fancy TUSK parts, but omit the anti skid.
I'll skip this one and stick with the Dragon AIM and SEP that are still far and away the best, and great bases for the super detailer.
I'll skip this one and stick with the Dragon AIM and SEP that are still far and away the best, and great bases for the super detailer.
Blucop
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: January 03, 2005
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 262 posts
Joined: January 03, 2005
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 262 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 28, 2012 - 06:52 AM UTC
Interesting link and discussion from the build article:
http://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/34475.html#cutid1
Pretty obvious the readers are biased to their own military and designs. What I found especially interesting were the photos and technical issues discussed. I never realized that the TUSK package specs were so widely available.
http://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/34475.html#cutid1
Pretty obvious the readers are biased to their own military and designs. What I found especially interesting were the photos and technical issues discussed. I never realized that the TUSK package specs were so widely available.