Would a Wirbelwind in Normandy have been applied with Zimmerit? If anyone knows that would be great, because I have noooo idea.
Thanks
-Conor
Hosted by Darren Baker
Wirbelwind with Zimmerit?
panzerconor
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 03:15 AM UTC
AFVFan
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 04:21 AM UTC
It's possible, but unlikely. I believe that the factories only zimmed the MTBs and assault guns. As an AA unit I don't think the crew would have been motivated enough to do a field application since they would rarely be in a close quarters fighting situation.
HermannB
Bayern, Germany
Joined: October 14, 2008
KitMaker: 4,099 posts
Armorama: 4,067 posts
Joined: October 14, 2008
KitMaker: 4,099 posts
Armorama: 4,067 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 04:33 AM UTC
Hi Conor,
I can confirm that the Flakpanzer IV Wirbelwind has be coated with Zimmerit. The Spielberger Panzer IV book show that Wirbelwind and Ostwind vehicles had the Zimmerit coating applied on the hull. The reason therefore was that the Flakpanzers were build on surplus tank hulls and so hulls with Zimmerit coating were not unlikely.
HTH
Hans-Hermann
I can confirm that the Flakpanzer IV Wirbelwind has be coated with Zimmerit. The Spielberger Panzer IV book show that Wirbelwind and Ostwind vehicles had the Zimmerit coating applied on the hull. The reason therefore was that the Flakpanzers were build on surplus tank hulls and so hulls with Zimmerit coating were not unlikely.
HTH
Hans-Hermann
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 04:54 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I can confirm that the Flakpanzer IV Wirbelwind has be coated with Zimmerit.
...So can I
HTH
Frenchy
panzerconor
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 04:58 AM UTC
Well s**t, time to get some putty and get to work.
I was hoping they didn't have any hahaha. Oh well...
Thanks guys
-Conor
I was hoping they didn't have any hahaha. Oh well...
Thanks guys
-Conor
sauceman
Ontario, Canada
Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts
Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 05:02 AM UTC
Sorry tell tell you, but ya LOL.
Here is the one in Camp Borden...
cheers
Here is the one in Camp Borden...
cheers
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 05:16 AM UTC
Talking about the use of Wirbelwinds in Normandy, here's a thread from ML :
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47207/thread/992897724/Wirbelwind
The 12 SS Pz Division "prototype" mentioned in the thread above can be seen here :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/deckarudo/6897617463/
HTH
Frenchy
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47207/thread/992897724/Wirbelwind
The 12 SS Pz Division "prototype" mentioned in the thread above can be seen here :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/deckarudo/6897617463/
HTH
Frenchy
Cobrahistorian
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: November 11, 2006
KitMaker: 710 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Joined: November 11, 2006
KitMaker: 710 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 06:24 AM UTC
Good to know! I just picked up a Wirbelwind kit this week and have been looking into options for building it. Looking for a good non-SS unit to represent.
Jon
Jon
AFVFan
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 07:36 AM UTC
I guess I stand slightly corrected....but I did say it was possible.
panzerbob01
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 08:31 AM UTC
Conor;
Hi! Wirbelwinds (Flakpanzer IV Wirbelwind; 2cm flakvierling 38 auf fahrgestel Pz.Kpfw. IV) and zimmerit...
As I think has been noted above posts, the wirbelwind was a conversion of an older Panzer IV to a flakpanzer, created by swapping a large open-top flak-turret and gun assembly in for the normal long-gun "MBT" turret. These fabrications were built by OstBau Werke - Sagan starting in mid - later May 1944, with somewheres around 85 - 100 or so being completed by NOV 1944, when this production ceased. OstBau used available running hulls obtained from units turning in badly-damaged Pz IV for refurbishment. Different sources variably indicate that these tanks included Pz.IV Ausf. F, G and H, and some early J hulls.
So, did wirbelwinds get or have zimmerit? YES - many did, as seen in various period pics. It seems likely that zimm'd wirbels had zimm because they were built on tanks which already had zimm - as there is no clear record that OstBau did any zimm application during their rebuild process. From this, knowing whether the original base hull was an F, G, H or J matters.
As a matter of record, no F or G received factory zimmerit, as these were all built prior to SEP 1943, when factory zimm application started. The first 1000 or so H also "escaped" factory zimm, for the same reason. Later H and all J hulls used for wirbels would have been factory zimm'd. As to whether ANY Pz IV was actually "field-zimm'd"... any such job would likely have really been a repair shop event and not some crew effort conducted between shell-bursts. There probably were a few, but this may not matter for this!
IF the question is about Wirbelwinds at Normandy (ca June 06 - 20, 1944?) and whether any would have had zimm... there simply cannot have been many wirbelwinds there by 06 June 1944 if they only started production in mid-May over in Silesia (Sagan). Of whichever few there could have been, probably some were zimm'd, based on the guess that it was "first in - first used" for the hulls sent to Sagan.
So... IF you decide to build a G wirbel, then it most likely had no (factory) zimm (and there is a recent Dragon Wirbel G kit exactly for this!). And then there are available both wirbel H w/ and w/o zimm kits... and you (like I w/ my ancient Tamiya rendition of this thing) always have the option of adding your own!
Seems like you have some choices - albeit not much record for wirbels in Normandy in early June, 1944!
Bob
Hi! Wirbelwinds (Flakpanzer IV Wirbelwind; 2cm flakvierling 38 auf fahrgestel Pz.Kpfw. IV) and zimmerit...
As I think has been noted above posts, the wirbelwind was a conversion of an older Panzer IV to a flakpanzer, created by swapping a large open-top flak-turret and gun assembly in for the normal long-gun "MBT" turret. These fabrications were built by OstBau Werke - Sagan starting in mid - later May 1944, with somewheres around 85 - 100 or so being completed by NOV 1944, when this production ceased. OstBau used available running hulls obtained from units turning in badly-damaged Pz IV for refurbishment. Different sources variably indicate that these tanks included Pz.IV Ausf. F, G and H, and some early J hulls.
So, did wirbelwinds get or have zimmerit? YES - many did, as seen in various period pics. It seems likely that zimm'd wirbels had zimm because they were built on tanks which already had zimm - as there is no clear record that OstBau did any zimm application during their rebuild process. From this, knowing whether the original base hull was an F, G, H or J matters.
As a matter of record, no F or G received factory zimmerit, as these were all built prior to SEP 1943, when factory zimm application started. The first 1000 or so H also "escaped" factory zimm, for the same reason. Later H and all J hulls used for wirbels would have been factory zimm'd. As to whether ANY Pz IV was actually "field-zimm'd"... any such job would likely have really been a repair shop event and not some crew effort conducted between shell-bursts. There probably were a few, but this may not matter for this!
IF the question is about Wirbelwinds at Normandy (ca June 06 - 20, 1944?) and whether any would have had zimm... there simply cannot have been many wirbelwinds there by 06 June 1944 if they only started production in mid-May over in Silesia (Sagan). Of whichever few there could have been, probably some were zimm'd, based on the guess that it was "first in - first used" for the hulls sent to Sagan.
So... IF you decide to build a G wirbel, then it most likely had no (factory) zimm (and there is a recent Dragon Wirbel G kit exactly for this!). And then there are available both wirbel H w/ and w/o zimm kits... and you (like I w/ my ancient Tamiya rendition of this thing) always have the option of adding your own!
Seems like you have some choices - albeit not much record for wirbels in Normandy in early June, 1944!
Bob
panzerconor
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 11:28 AM UTC
Quoted Text
(and there is a recent Dragon Wirbel G kit exactly for this!).
Yup! That's the kit I've got, so I guess no Zimm for it (thank God.) I'm hopefully going to be putting it into a scene with a Tiger & some Panzer Grenadiers (9th or 10th SS maybe), but I'm not sure yet as I don't know if any Wirbelwinds would be up close to the combat.
Thanks a lot
-Conor
panzerbob01
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 - 02:47 PM UTC
So... Looks like I got somewhat ahead of myself! Dragon does NOT have a Wirbel H with zimm kit... The D's zimm'd Wirbel kit is an "early production" Wirbel Ausf. G w/zimm! Somehow I had convinced myself a little while back that the new zimm'd Wirbel kit was an H...
I'll still stick with pretty much all I said above, save that I was quite off on that zimm'd kit version! Looks indeed like folks have choices of Dragon Wirbel G with zimm or without zimm, or you can have an H without zimm.
Maybe, seeing as more H hulls would have had zimm, most H-based Wirbels would have been zimm'd, so it would make sense for the D to send out an H with zimm version, to complete the Wirbel platoon!
Bob
I'll still stick with pretty much all I said above, save that I was quite off on that zimm'd kit version! Looks indeed like folks have choices of Dragon Wirbel G with zimm or without zimm, or you can have an H without zimm.
Maybe, seeing as more H hulls would have had zimm, most H-based Wirbels would have been zimm'd, so it would make sense for the D to send out an H with zimm version, to complete the Wirbel platoon!
Bob
panzerconor
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 29, 2012 - 05:42 AM UTC
Well if there was only one Wirbelwind in Normandy without Zimmerit, that's the one I'm building
Thanks again
-Conor
Thanks again
-Conor
ElCapitan
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 14, 2007
KitMaker: 219 posts
Armorama: 217 posts
Joined: May 14, 2007
KitMaker: 219 posts
Armorama: 217 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 29, 2012 - 05:52 AM UTC
Connor,
I like that attitude! To he__ with the zimmerit! Have fun and enjoy building for the sake of enjoying the build, it's a great hobby.
Keep up the great work.
Kevin
I like that attitude! To he__ with the zimmerit! Have fun and enjoy building for the sake of enjoying the build, it's a great hobby.
Keep up the great work.
Kevin
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 29, 2012 - 06:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Well if there was only one Wirbelwind in Normandy without Zimmerit, that's the one I'm building
Providing there was at least one Wirbelwind used in Normandy indeed...
Apparently, only 3 prototypes had been "scratchbuilt" by the 12 SS Pz Division and used there :
http://www.colleurs-de-plastique.com/forums/showthread.php?32489-Proto-Flakvierling-en-Normandie&highlight=wirbelwind
But Wirbelwinds have been used later in France. Here's one belonging to the 111 Panzer Brigade in Lorraine in September 1944 (no Zimmerit ) :
Anyway it's up to you
Frenchy
Cobrahistorian
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: November 11, 2006
KitMaker: 710 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Joined: November 11, 2006
KitMaker: 710 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 29, 2012 - 07:41 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextWell if there was only one Wirbelwind in Normandy without Zimmerit, that's the one I'm building
Providing there was at least one Wirbelwind used in Normandy indeed...
Apparently, only 3 prototypes had been "scratchbuilt" by the 12 SS Pz Division and used there :
http://www.colleurs-de-plastique.com/forums/showthread.php?32489-Proto-Flakvierling-en-Normandie&highlight=wirbelwind
But Wirbelwinds have been used later in France. Here's one belonging to the 111 Panzer Brigade in Lorraine in September 1944 (no Zimmerit ) :
Anyway it's up to you
Frenchy
Frenchy,
As usual, you come up with the best pics. Now I know which Wirbel I'm gonna build when I get around to it!
Thanks!
Jon
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 29, 2012 - 07:54 AM UTC
You're welcome Jon. I guess this one belongs to the same unit, but this time it has Zimmerit... :
Frenchy
Frenchy
panzerbob01
Louisiana, United States
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Joined: March 06, 2010
KitMaker: 3,128 posts
Armorama: 2,959 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 29, 2012 - 09:59 AM UTC
Yeah...!
The first pic Frenchy posted is the G which is probably reasonably captured in the recent Dragon Wirbel G (w/o zimm) kit... that's the one I got that G kit for! (OK, I've seen this pic many a time - I didn't know whether it was or not anywheres near Normandy - it's the nice, zimm-free "G-ness" of the thing which caught my eye! ) From where I sit, I cannot say that the second pic is a G or an H - it does look like there's a little zimm down around that running-gear...! Maybe that's the one for the currently-discussed G w/ zimm kit!
@Conor: I think Frenchy's first pic makes my case for G w/o zimm available in 1944 and provides you the apparent option at a zimm-free Wirbel in or near Normandy somewheres in Jun 1944! Get buildin'!
Bob
The first pic Frenchy posted is the G which is probably reasonably captured in the recent Dragon Wirbel G (w/o zimm) kit... that's the one I got that G kit for! (OK, I've seen this pic many a time - I didn't know whether it was or not anywheres near Normandy - it's the nice, zimm-free "G-ness" of the thing which caught my eye! ) From where I sit, I cannot say that the second pic is a G or an H - it does look like there's a little zimm down around that running-gear...! Maybe that's the one for the currently-discussed G w/ zimm kit!
@Conor: I think Frenchy's first pic makes my case for G w/o zimm available in 1944 and provides you the apparent option at a zimm-free Wirbel in or near Normandy somewheres in Jun 1944! Get buildin'!
Bob
panzerconor
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 29, 2012 - 03:45 PM UTC
Good, no zimm. I got Dragon's "Achtung-Jabo" figure kit to use with it too. The figures won't fit in regularly so I'll just butcher them to fit in right
I've actually gone and built the turret while this post went on and on, and it was actually pretty easy. I might be able to post a picture tomorrow.
Thanks again
-Conor
I've actually gone and built the turret while this post went on and on, and it was actually pretty easy. I might be able to post a picture tomorrow.
Thanks again
-Conor