Todd Michalak peeks inside Dragon's new Sd.Kfz.167 StuG.IV Mid-Production.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
DML StuG IV Mid-Productionc5flies
California, United States
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Joined: October 21, 2007
KitMaker: 3,684 posts
Armorama: 2,938 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 23, 2013 - 05:57 AM UTC
Thudius
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: October 22, 2012
KitMaker: 1,194 posts
Armorama: 1,077 posts
Joined: October 22, 2012
KitMaker: 1,194 posts
Armorama: 1,077 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 09, 2013 - 10:57 AM UTC
Does this include all the bits for an "early"? I can see the optional roof and idler.
TRM5150
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 09, 2013 - 01:17 PM UTC
Hello Kiimo!! I am confident this is essentially the 'Early' version with the added IV mid sprue, however I do not have the Early version to compare exactly. Here is the Russ Amott's [ RUSSAMOTTO ] review for the Early: https://armorama.kitmaker.net/review/5764 They do match up almost the same but the "Late" version sprue. The roof section is slightly different.
Thudius
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: October 22, 2012
KitMaker: 1,194 posts
Armorama: 1,077 posts
Joined: October 22, 2012
KitMaker: 1,194 posts
Armorama: 1,077 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 10, 2013 - 02:49 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hello Kiimo!! I am confident this is essentially the 'Early' version with the added IV mid sprue, however I do not have the Early version to compare exactly. Here is the Russ Amott's [ RUSSAMOTTO ] review for the Early: https://armorama.kitmaker.net/review/5764 They do match up almost the same but the "Late" version sprue. The roof section is slightly different.
Thanks, I'll have to have a closer look at the sprues. I got an early in the mail, I just like the look of the early style shield over the remote mg and the other early features for some reason. Plus it seems the mid is actually cheaper, at least on evil bay.
TRM5150
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 10, 2013 - 04:16 AM UTC
Sprue P in the mid, which is one of the different ones form the two kits has the shields on it: https://armorama.kitmaker.net/photos/review/8757/42.jpg I could see in the other review as to which parts were the shields.
Thudius
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: October 22, 2012
KitMaker: 1,194 posts
Armorama: 1,077 posts
Joined: October 22, 2012
KitMaker: 1,194 posts
Armorama: 1,077 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 10, 2013 - 10:11 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Sprue P in the mid, which is one of the different ones form the two kits has the shields on it: https://armorama.kitmaker.net/photos/review/8757/42.jpg I could see in the other review as to which parts were the shields.
Just had a closer look at he review pics, the early shield and exhaust are there. I guess the mid and early use the same rear hull plates.