Hosted by Darren Baker
Mirror Models' Diamond T Wrecker
Posted: Thursday, July 10, 2014 - 11:59 AM UTC
Posted: Thursday, July 10, 2014 - 12:02 PM UTC
freddietello
Alicante, Spain / España
Joined: May 18, 2012
KitMaker: 199 posts
Armorama: 175 posts
Joined: May 18, 2012
KitMaker: 199 posts
Armorama: 175 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 10, 2014 - 09:46 PM UTC
I'm finishing mine now and I had no problems, It's a bit complex kit but not as complex as a bad resin kit, sorry you payed that incredible price for it, maybe they made a mistake in your local store?
Posted: Saturday, July 12, 2014 - 04:17 AM UTC
Check out the competition over at Mirror Models for the best Diamond T Wrecker build! The grand prize is a 1000 shopping spree! WOW
http://www.mirror-models.com/Diamond-T-969-wrecker-contest.html
Right now Pascal is in the lead but they are all looking like seriously good modeling work!
Here is Henri's offering:
I love the engine detailing, the tools on the front fender and that Texaco oil can.
http://www.mirror-models.com/Diamond-T-969-wrecker-contest.html
Right now Pascal is in the lead but they are all looking like seriously good modeling work!
Here is Henri's offering:
I love the engine detailing, the tools on the front fender and that Texaco oil can.
Posted: Saturday, July 12, 2014 - 08:30 AM UTC
Posted: Saturday, July 12, 2014 - 09:09 AM UTC
Click on the link below to cast your vote:
http://www.mirror-models.com/Diamond-T-969-wrecker-contest.html
http://www.mirror-models.com/Diamond-T-969-wrecker-contest.html
Posted: Saturday, July 12, 2014 - 11:25 AM UTC
Posted: Saturday, July 12, 2014 - 11:35 AM UTC
airborne1
Queensland, Australia
Joined: April 15, 2006
KitMaker: 915 posts
Armorama: 797 posts
Joined: April 15, 2006
KitMaker: 915 posts
Armorama: 797 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 12, 2014 - 04:46 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Click on the link below to cast your vote:
http://www.mirror-models.com/Diamond-T-969-wrecker-contest.html
and this one
Hey Michael, don't forget this one as well
Posted: Sunday, July 13, 2014 - 02:34 AM UTC
Sorry Mike but did not think I should show all the models but rather to post the link and try to encourage more voting,
Best of luck!
Best of luck!
airborne1
Queensland, Australia
Joined: April 15, 2006
KitMaker: 915 posts
Armorama: 797 posts
Joined: April 15, 2006
KitMaker: 915 posts
Armorama: 797 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 13, 2014 - 09:54 PM UTC
Thanks Mike,
I've washed out in the build contest.
It's good to see your posting your work , I have been watching. It is a challenge of a build but persistence is the key because the wrecker looks the part when completed.
Now back to a famo and Panzer 3
I've washed out in the build contest.
It's good to see your posting your work , I have been watching. It is a challenge of a build but persistence is the key because the wrecker looks the part when completed.
Now back to a famo and Panzer 3
Posted: Monday, July 14, 2014 - 10:05 AM UTC
Well my Diamond T Cargo Truck arrived today from Wanamaker Hobbies. (Oh Boy!) As every one knows I was planning on doing a scratch/conversion changing the cargo truck into the Diamond T dump truck. However it looks like King Libor at Mirror beat me to the punch:
On the last page of the cargo instructions King announces;
"Coming Soon: Diamond T dump truck!
I wonder which cab he will include? Hey King, I need some way to acquire extra enclosed cabs!
Oh well I'm back to plan A which is to swap the hard cab for the wrecker and use the open cab on the cargo truck.
On the last page of the cargo instructions King announces;
"Coming Soon: Diamond T dump truck!
I wonder which cab he will include? Hey King, I need some way to acquire extra enclosed cabs!
Oh well I'm back to plan A which is to swap the hard cab for the wrecker and use the open cab on the cargo truck.
Posted: Monday, July 14, 2014 - 10:18 AM UTC
Posted: Monday, July 14, 2014 - 12:30 PM UTC
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Monday, July 14, 2014 - 01:14 PM UTC
Beautiful work.
Kinda tough decision between this and the M19 The Diamond T Tank Transporter.
I will keep in touch on this one.
Jeff
Kinda tough decision between this and the M19 The Diamond T Tank Transporter.
I will keep in touch on this one.
Jeff
Posted: Monday, July 14, 2014 - 03:36 PM UTC
The kit of the M19 looks to be every bit as well detailed as the Wrecker and looks to produce just as good a build. I would love to have them both but the Diamond T/Holmes wrecker is just packed with SO MUCH detail I couldn't resist. I know the M19 has sheer size going for it but the wrecker is a 6x6 whereas the M19 is a 4x6 so there you have even more driveline detail going for the wrecker!
_________________________________________________
Also, and this is just a personal observation that is not a reflection on anything other than that it expresses my own likes and dislikes. I have always had this idea in my mind that a ballast tractor such as the M19 is just an inherently wasteful design. The idea that you would have to load dead weight onto a towing vehicle in order for it to have sufficient tractive effort to pull the trailer just goes against the grain for me.
As an alternative example; the Dragon Wagon is based on a semi trailer design so part of the weight of the load is transfered to the tractor and converted to tractive effort without the need for adding additional dead weight. Similarly with the Mack NO when pulling the 155mm Long Tom without the towing limber; the specially designed Mack hitch on the tractor transfered part of the weight of the gun trails onto the prime mover chassis so there was no need for additional dead weight being added to that vehicle.
I know, I know . . . I'm weird!
_________________________________________________
Also, and this is just a personal observation that is not a reflection on anything other than that it expresses my own likes and dislikes. I have always had this idea in my mind that a ballast tractor such as the M19 is just an inherently wasteful design. The idea that you would have to load dead weight onto a towing vehicle in order for it to have sufficient tractive effort to pull the trailer just goes against the grain for me.
As an alternative example; the Dragon Wagon is based on a semi trailer design so part of the weight of the load is transfered to the tractor and converted to tractive effort without the need for adding additional dead weight. Similarly with the Mack NO when pulling the 155mm Long Tom without the towing limber; the specially designed Mack hitch on the tractor transfered part of the weight of the gun trails onto the prime mover chassis so there was no need for additional dead weight being added to that vehicle.
I know, I know . . . I'm weird!
Posted: Monday, July 14, 2014 - 04:45 PM UTC
panorama
Germany
Joined: January 18, 2013
KitMaker: 254 posts
Armorama: 253 posts
Joined: January 18, 2013
KitMaker: 254 posts
Armorama: 253 posts
Posted: Monday, July 14, 2014 - 10:11 PM UTC
Hi Michael,
you would like to show the drive train details? Why not just topple it over? Maybe they forgot to use the support struts properly or it sank in soft ground, or, or, or.
Just an idea. Upright or toppled - just keep posting. Looks like it turns into a nice one either way ;-)
Michael
you would like to show the drive train details? Why not just topple it over? Maybe they forgot to use the support struts properly or it sank in soft ground, or, or, or.
Just an idea. Upright or toppled - just keep posting. Looks like it turns into a nice one either way ;-)
Michael
Posted: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 - 12:36 AM UTC
Interesting; a buddy of mine is scratch building a C2 Army Air Corps wrecker with a Gar-Wood crane in 1/32 and plans to to do that very thing. He intends to pair it with some WWII aircraft in a pose where clearly the load got away from the operator and he tipped the vehicle over.
Right now I just want mine dusty but otherwise pristene. I wish the booms and jake legs were positionable so I could work on a diorama idea later but unfortunately no.
Right now I just want mine dusty but otherwise pristene. I wish the booms and jake legs were positionable so I could work on a diorama idea later but unfortunately no.
Posted: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 - 12:43 AM UTC
Posted: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 - 12:56 AM UTC
Posted: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 - 10:49 PM UTC
Posted: Thursday, July 17, 2014 - 11:18 PM UTC
Posted: Friday, July 18, 2014 - 01:04 AM UTC
Here is something a bit different: a front mounted stiff leg crane mounted on a Diamond T being used to place a bridging secton.
(Photo Life Magazine)
Judging by the angle of those boom support cables they probably go all the way back to the rear beam of the load box. From there, I suspect they are attached to the truck frame.
(Photo Life Magazine)
Judging by the angle of those boom support cables they probably go all the way back to the rear beam of the load box. From there, I suspect they are attached to the truck frame.
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, July 18, 2014 - 01:40 AM UTC
Hi Mike
I guess this one hasn't already been posted here . Here's a link to a thread stuffed with (mostly restored) Diamond T's. Many wreckers inside
http://hmvf.co.uk/forumvb/showthread.php?7379-Diamond-T-Gallery
Keep on the good work !
H.P.
I guess this one hasn't already been posted here . Here's a link to a thread stuffed with (mostly restored) Diamond T's. Many wreckers inside
http://hmvf.co.uk/forumvb/showthread.php?7379-Diamond-T-Gallery
Keep on the good work !
H.P.