Jim takes a look at this new kit from MiniArt. One that has been expected for a long while and is finally available.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Dioramas
Do you love dioramas & vignettes? We sure do.
Do you love dioramas & vignettes? We sure do.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
VIDEO
Unboxing MiniArt's European TramPosted: Monday, January 13, 2014 - 11:39 AM UTC
Posted: Monday, January 13, 2014 - 01:40 PM UTC
609 parts??? Amazing.
PlasticGeezer
Louisiana, United States
Joined: September 17, 2013
KitMaker: 28 posts
Armorama: 27 posts
Joined: September 17, 2013
KitMaker: 28 posts
Armorama: 27 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 - 03:59 AM UTC
Looks like Mini Art has done a good job on the molding of this one. The detail looks really nice. I'm going to have to put this on my wish list. A nice change of pace from your typical 1/35 kit, hope to see more subjects along this line.
mmeier
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: October 22, 2008
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,015 posts
Joined: October 22, 2008
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,015 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 - 09:00 AM UTC
And looking at Preise Miniatures there might be some nice passengers that fit the time periods those trams where used
The 63000 set looks nice. Listed as 1:32 but they are closer to 1:35 actually.
The 63000 set looks nice. Listed as 1:32 but they are closer to 1:35 actually.
TRM5150
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 16, 2014 - 02:41 PM UTC
Great looking kit Jim! Tons of possibilities!! Thanks for the video review!!
LAH1SS
Australia
Joined: August 02, 2008
KitMaker: 231 posts
Armorama: 171 posts
Joined: August 02, 2008
KitMaker: 231 posts
Armorama: 171 posts
Posted: Friday, January 17, 2014 - 11:21 AM UTC
I see they have a German tram listed in the new 2014 catalogue I wonder what the differences will be if any
Nice review mate
Nice review mate
mailman7
Joined: January 25, 2003
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 34 posts
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 34 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 06, 2014 - 05:40 AM UTC
I think that the only differences are the advertising signs.
mailman7
Joined: January 25, 2003
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 34 posts
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 34 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 06, 2014 - 05:43 AM UTC
Miniart really does use too many parts, I got totally pissed at their Russian GAZ truck, it is not sitting with a partially built suspension.
mailman7
Joined: January 25, 2003
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 34 posts
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 34 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 06, 2014 - 05:44 AM UTC
One problem mentioned is that the poles for the wires are too tall and should be shortened so the tram wire will reach the pole wires.
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 06, 2014 - 07:43 AM UTC
IMO, 609 parts will put some people off. Not that people haven't become accustomed to the Uber-Models that many manufacturers are producing (and people are building) but the problema is where is the core-market for this model? That should be 90% diorama builders, the other 10% may be modelers who want a different and attractive subject to display as a one-off perhaps. However, it's within the former group that my comments are aimed at.
Adding anything like this is a nice feature within a Diorama. It's likely, that it'll be modeled as a part of the Street Furniture with tangled power lines etc. How many are actually going to build it as per the instructions? Therefore the idea of 609 parts does seem a Little pointless and perhaps MiniArt should have considered much less engineering on this with perhaps more simplified sub-assemblies (taking nothing away from the model itself) producing something which is simpler to add to a Dio?
It's not, IMO, particularly expensive (being around a third of the Price of the previous (RESIN) model of a tram), there is though a doubt that many will want to put a model of this level of sophistication as a point of interest in a dio.
I'm not knocking MiniArt, kudos to them for again thinking out-of the-box, but it does seem like a lot of design work for what is really a Diorama accesory...
Adding anything like this is a nice feature within a Diorama. It's likely, that it'll be modeled as a part of the Street Furniture with tangled power lines etc. How many are actually going to build it as per the instructions? Therefore the idea of 609 parts does seem a Little pointless and perhaps MiniArt should have considered much less engineering on this with perhaps more simplified sub-assemblies (taking nothing away from the model itself) producing something which is simpler to add to a Dio?
It's not, IMO, particularly expensive (being around a third of the Price of the previous (RESIN) model of a tram), there is though a doubt that many will want to put a model of this level of sophistication as a point of interest in a dio.
I'm not knocking MiniArt, kudos to them for again thinking out-of the-box, but it does seem like a lot of design work for what is really a Diorama accesory...