Hosted by Darren Baker
LAV III Interior Help

retiredyank

Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts

Posted: Monday, January 27, 2014 - 01:15 AM UTC
Is the driver's compartment for the Stryker the same as a Canadian LAV III? If not, can I use is as a base and what modifications would need to be made?

Nito74

Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts

Posted: Monday, January 27, 2014 - 01:31 AM UTC
Here are some LAV photos, I hope it helps on your project:
Here's the Stryker:
and a thread on Armorama with pics,
Stryker Interior



Here's the Stryker:

and a thread on Armorama with pics,
Stryker Interior

Nito74

Joined: March 04, 2008
KitMaker: 5,386 posts
Armorama: 4,727 posts

Posted: Monday, January 27, 2014 - 01:34 AM UTC
ArtyG37B

Joined: August 13, 2009
KitMaker: 420 posts
Armorama: 416 posts

Posted: Monday, January 27, 2014 - 02:06 AM UTC
Matt,
Ignore the 1st and last photo as they are not LAV III's. AFAIK the drivers compartment is the same as the Stryker. But I'm sure one of my Cdn brothers who drive them can tell you for sure.
Ignore the 1st and last photo as they are not LAV III's. AFAIK the drivers compartment is the same as the Stryker. But I'm sure one of my Cdn brothers who drive them can tell you for sure.

chienlaid

Joined: November 12, 2012
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 22 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 05:15 AM UTC
Is that a PRC-77 radio in that LAV III?
Didn't know they still used those. I used to fix those when I worked in Guelph, Ontario.
Didn't know they still used those. I used to fix those when I worked in Guelph, Ontario.

jwest21

Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 05:26 AM UTC
Sorry Matt- I owe you some exterior non-slip pics. I forgot, but will try to remember after work!


junglejim

Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 06:36 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Is that a PRC-77 radio in that LAV III?
If you're referring to the fourth photo, that's not a LAV-III as mentioned. Looks more like a M-1117 Guardian/V-150 type vehicle.
Jim

chienlaid

Joined: November 12, 2012
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 22 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 07:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextIs that a PRC-77 radio in that LAV III?
If you're referring to the fourth photo, that's not a LAV-III as mentioned. Looks more like a M-1117 Guardian/V-150 type vehicle.
Jim
Yes fourth photo.

sauceman

Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 09:33 AM UTC
The first and fourth pics are not a Canadian LAV III, they look like a LAV 150.
And yes those look like PRC radios.
cheers
And yes those look like PRC radios.
cheers

retiredyank

Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 09:47 AM UTC
Thank you all for the responses. John, the photos help immensely. And, thank you all for the clarification of which photos are actually the lav III I am referring to.
Jason: No worries. I found one I can use. It would seem that most of the horizontal surface has anti-slip covering it. I also found the correct paint for it.
However, it is Rust-o-Leum textured spray paint. I was told that it does not brush on, if I decant it. And, I am a little cautious as to whether I should risk running it through my airbrush.
That begs the question, is there an alternative? I don't think I can achieve the correct texture with Mr. Surfacer.
Jason: No worries. I found one I can use. It would seem that most of the horizontal surface has anti-slip covering it. I also found the correct paint for it.
However, it is Rust-o-Leum textured spray paint. I was told that it does not brush on, if I decant it. And, I am a little cautious as to whether I should risk running it through my airbrush.
That begs the question, is there an alternative? I don't think I can achieve the correct texture with Mr. Surfacer.

gcdavidson

Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 01:01 PM UTC
the no-skid on a 35th scale LAV is probably too fine to see. I wouldn't bother.

sauceman

Joined: September 28, 2006
KitMaker: 2,672 posts
Armorama: 2,475 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 02:01 PM UTC
Quoted Text
the no-skid on a 35th scale LAV is probably too fine to see. I wouldn't bother.
I concur, it's waaaaayyyyy too fine, and at this scale it would not be noticeable.
cheers

retiredyank

Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts

Posted: Thursday, January 30, 2014 - 02:44 PM UTC
That solves that problem.

Beobachtungsbereich

Joined: August 26, 2012
KitMaker: 19 posts
Armorama: 19 posts

Posted: Sunday, February 02, 2014 - 02:03 AM UTC
If it's up armoured, the anti slip coating is covered by the plates.
Regards
Regards
![]() |