Todd Michalak gives us a review of Dragon Models’ Pz.Kpfw.II Ausf.A w/Interior Kit No. 6687
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
Pz.Kpfw.II Ausf. APosted: Sunday, February 09, 2014 - 01:05 PM UTC
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Monday, February 10, 2014 - 03:13 AM UTC
Glad to see no "unknown unit" in the paint schemes. Good review, Todd.
rolf
Washington, United States
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Posted: Monday, February 10, 2014 - 06:01 AM UTC
Did Dragon fix the tracks to fit the 26 tooth sprocket? Nice looking kit.
Roy
Roy
TRM5150
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Posted: Monday, February 10, 2014 - 06:22 AM UTC
Thanks Bill!! Nice to see the "unknown" missingmaking way for an additional configuration!
Hi Roy, the sprockets do have the correct 26 tooth layout and the tracks should fit without an issue. The kit is pretty decent! There are a ton of SMALL interior parts to deal with and of course the tracks I mentioned but with patience everything works out!
Hi Roy, the sprockets do have the correct 26 tooth layout and the tracks should fit without an issue. The kit is pretty decent! There are a ton of SMALL interior parts to deal with and of course the tracks I mentioned but with patience everything works out!
rolf
Washington, United States
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Posted: Monday, February 10, 2014 - 06:47 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Thanks Bill!! Nice to see the "unknown" missingmaking way for an additional configuration!
Hi Roy, the sprockets do have the correct 26 tooth layout and the tracks should fit without an issue. The kit is pretty decent! There are a ton of SMALL interior parts to deal with and of course the tracks I mentioned but with patience everything works out!
O.K., I ask because Dragon fixed the sprocket for their Bison II kit but didn't fix the tracks which were designed to fit the earlier inaccurate 25 tooth sprockets they had in their Panzer II Ausf F and Marder II kit. The result was the tracks didn't fit on the Bison II kit. I see in your review that the sprocket has the 26 teeth but I cant tell if the tracks have been fixed to fit or not. Thanks for the reply.
Roy
TRM5150
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Joined: January 03, 2010
KitMaker: 2,159 posts
Armorama: 707 posts
Posted: Monday, February 10, 2014 - 08:10 AM UTC
Hi Roy,
If I look back to the past Ausf. B review from Bill Plunk, the "B" consisted of the sproket repair with the correct links. The links in this kit certainly appears to be the right Pz. II tracks (there was only the two unmarked bags of track links)knowing that DML had largly based this kit on the "B" I would think this to be a corrected issue.
If I look back to the past Ausf. B review from Bill Plunk, the "B" consisted of the sproket repair with the correct links. The links in this kit certainly appears to be the right Pz. II tracks (there was only the two unmarked bags of track links)knowing that DML had largly based this kit on the "B" I would think this to be a corrected issue.
rolf
Washington, United States
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Joined: August 17, 2004
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 250 posts
Posted: Monday, February 10, 2014 - 05:27 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Hi Roy,
If I look back to the past Ausf. B review from Bill Plunk, the "B" consisted of the sproket repair with the correct links. The links in this kit certainly appears to be the right Pz. II tracks (there was only the two unmarked bags of track links)knowing that DML had largly based this kit on the "B" I would think this to be a corrected issue.
Great. I forgot about the B kit. It's good to hear they fixed that issue.
Roy
andyspencer4077
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2017
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Joined: April 20, 2017
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 10:49 AM UTC
I know this topic is a little old but I was wondering if there was a way to make this kit into the ausf.b or ausf.c version given that it is a mishap mash of several kits? Are there any visual differences between them? I have done my research but struggled given that only 75 a's were ever made.