_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Allied - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Allied forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
first DUKW is ( almost ) ready
demodelbouwer
Visit this Community
Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: April 13, 2002
KitMaker: 792 posts
Armorama: 314 posts
Posted: Thursday, December 18, 2003 - 11:56 PM UTC
Well guys here is my firts DUKW ...
It is a hell of a job to build this creature but i'm pleased with the result .

Now i have to build another one.......

enjoy the pictures..

happy holiday's (:-) (:-)

Eric










There are more pictures .... to be found here : http://members.lycos.nl/opmbbs/DUKW/dukw.htm










Major_Goose
Visit this Community
Kikladhes, Greece / Ελλάδα
Joined: September 30, 2003
KitMaker: 6,871 posts
Armorama: 2,071 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 12:15 AM UTC
Very fine modelling my friend i like this model al lot and i hope sometime i have the chanche to build it. You ve done a nice clean build and sophisticated weathering not too much and overall a beauty . Congratsulations
Hollowpoint
Visit this Community
Kansas, United States
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,748 posts
Armorama: 1,797 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 12:32 AM UTC
Eric:

Very nice. Did you use an aftermarket PE set on it or did you make the details yourself?
jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 12:42 AM UTC
Eric, very nice looking DUKW you've got yourself there, . Just one thing I would mention, the rope fenders. They seen too uniform to me, most of the pics I have, show them more like large balls of string, or am I wrong here and these are fenders from large truck tyres? If the latter is the case, they would have considerable weathering on them with sections of rubber showing through or even large 'chunks' missing....
The weathering is good, although I would tend to do a bit more on the cargo deck, rust, and some graphite weathering perhaps? This comes from personal experience. In July, at a military vehicle rally, I was talking to someone whose business is the restoration and sale of DUKWs. I was asking him about the wear and tear on a vehicle in service (he was an ex-DUKW driver) and was talking about the vulnerability of the deck area to damage, corrosion and general wear and tear. According to him, the deck (on an in-service) DUKW needed repainting more than any other part..

Don't take my comments the wrong way, it is a truly superb piece of modelling and I for one would be delighted to have this in my own collection. Just what modifications did you have to do on the kit? I know its not of the 'Shake and Bake' variety but how much extra did it involve. Obviously the work you have done on this is a lot more than 'OOB' just how much?

So what happens now with this? It just screams to be put in a beach landing diorama... Thanks for sharing it with us, very welcome indeed.... Jim
demodelbouwer
Visit this Community
Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: April 13, 2002
KitMaker: 792 posts
Armorama: 314 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 01:00 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Eric:

Very nice. Did you use an aftermarket PE set on it or did you make the details yourself?



yoooooo bro...
i used the Eduard P.E. set and some resin aftermarket parts aswell........ THe O-ring and the .50 and the crates.....

and a lot of patience

Eric
demodelbouwer
Visit this Community
Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: April 13, 2002
KitMaker: 792 posts
Armorama: 314 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 01:06 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Eric, very nice looking DUKW you've got yourself there, . Just one thing I would mention, the rope fenders. They seen too uniform to me, most of the pics I have, show them more like large balls of string, or am I wrong here and these are fenders from large truck tyres? If the latter is the case, they would have considerable weathering on them with sections of rubber showing through or even large 'chunks' missing....
The weathering is good, although I would tend to do a bit more on the cargo deck, rust, and some graphite weathering perhaps? This comes from personal experience. In July, at a military vehicle rally, I was talking to someone whose business is the restoration and sale of DUKWs. I was asking him about the wear and tear on a vehicle in service (he was an ex-DUKW driver) and was talking about the vulnerability of the deck area to damage, corrosion and general wear and tear. According to him, the deck (on an in-service) DUKW needed repainting more than any other part..

Don't take my comments the wrong way, it is a truly superb piece of modelling and I for one would be delighted to have this in my own collection. Just what modifications did you have to do on the kit? I know its not of the 'Shake and Bake' variety but how much extra did it involve. Obviously the work you have done on this is a lot more than 'OOB' just how much?

So what happens now with this? It just screams to be put in a beach landing diorama... Thanks for sharing it with us, very welcome indeed.... Jim




Jim i've checked the side fenders but they are the rope ones not the tyre ones.......
And the pictures do not give a right prospective about the colors.......

And this one with the LCVP and another DUKW will end up in a landing Diorama..
I will keep you informed

Eric
Bus
Visit this Community
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Joined: December 11, 2003
KitMaker: 846 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 04:29 AM UTC
Great model! Imagine this on a dio...coming out of Omaha Beach...WOW
JimF
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: July 05, 2002
KitMaker: 717 posts
Armorama: 621 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 04:46 AM UTC
Very impressive work... a real pleasure to see
MrRoo
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 11:01 AM UTC
nicely done. My one major comment would be that the figure fireing the MG would have been standing on the seat with his arms up though the MG ring itself. From this position he can cover 360 degs and not 180 deg.

The rope fenders are correct and are an amazing part of the OOB Italeri kit.

a nicely done job and congrats to you for producing a nice model
Fritz
Visit this Community
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: March 17, 2003
KitMaker: 495 posts
Armorama: 140 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 10:36 PM UTC
A really nice model there. The weathering is one of the best I've seen. One thing I would like to point out is the .50 cal machinegun. The ammo box beside it doesn't go quite well with the rest of the model. I suggest you use Academy's U.S. machinegun set or some PE parts. This is just a suggestion though, as long as you like the model, what we say is not important.

Very good work!
demodelbouwer
Visit this Community
Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: April 13, 2002
KitMaker: 792 posts
Armorama: 314 posts
Posted: Friday, December 19, 2003 - 11:18 PM UTC

Quoted Text

A really nice model there. The weathering is one of the best I've seen. One thing I would like to point out is the .50 cal machinegun. The ammo box beside it doesn't go quite well with the rest of the model. I suggest you use Academy's U.S. machinegun set or some PE parts. This is just a suggestion though, as long as you like the model, what we say is not important.

Very good work!



Fritz ,

I have to do some alterations here and there on the model... and your right i also think i will change the ammo box for the Academy one . the one attached i not glued yet so it will be easy to remove...

cheers

Eric

(:-) (:-) (:-) (:-)
Graywolf
Staff MemberSenior Editor
HISTORICUS FORMA
Visit this Community
Izmir, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 6,405 posts
Armorama: 1,850 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 20, 2003 - 02:22 AM UTC
very nice modelling,detailing and painting.The pose of machine gunner is so realistic.
Merry Christmas and Happy new year Eric (:-)
IanSadler
Visit this Community
United Kingdom
Joined: December 22, 2002
KitMaker: 324 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 20, 2003 - 03:14 AM UTC
hi very good job on the dukw , i thought when i saw your posting it was a mk 1 dukw that you had built by backdating the kit, i have built a mark1 and mk3 but why did you leave the tyre inflation panel in the drivers consol a very common mistake , it was only fitted when the tyre inflation kit was added and this was mainly to the mk 4 . the fenders were to a standard style borrowed from the navy and as to old tyres fitted to the bow and cargo sides yes some photos do show them but not many . as to the comment about the repainting of the cargo bed , i find this hard to believe as it was made from marine plywood not metal ,i recently spoke to a chap who took the first dukw into d day h hour plus 45 minutes to land lord lovat and his commandos at sword beach , i have his photos on file , cheers ian
ShermiesRule
Visit this Community
Michigan, United States
Joined: December 11, 2003
KitMaker: 5,409 posts
Armorama: 3,777 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 21, 2003 - 01:27 PM UTC
Where did the machine gunner figure come from?
 _GOTOTOP