Hi guys,
I found this one in my sparebox. Originally it comes from AA´s SAS Land Rover kit if I remember well.
Could you please help to identify this weapon? Would it be possible troops used that in Op. Telic in 2003?
Thank you for your help.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Please help identify british MANPAD weapon
skarik
Praha, Czech Republic
Joined: February 08, 2005
KitMaker: 324 posts
Armorama: 295 posts
Joined: February 08, 2005
KitMaker: 324 posts
Armorama: 295 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 10, 2014 - 06:41 PM UTC
HermannB
Bayern, Germany
Joined: October 14, 2008
KitMaker: 4,099 posts
Armorama: 4,067 posts
Joined: October 14, 2008
KitMaker: 4,099 posts
Armorama: 4,067 posts
Posted: Saturday, May 10, 2014 - 07:29 PM UTC
Hi Jiri,
this is not a Man Portable Air Defense Weapon but the LAW 80 Antitank weapon. It was fielded in the 1980`s, so It shuold be used in Op Telic.
HTH
Hans-Hermann
this is not a Man Portable Air Defense Weapon but the LAW 80 Antitank weapon. It was fielded in the 1980`s, so It shuold be used in Op Telic.
HTH
Hans-Hermann
skarik
Praha, Czech Republic
Joined: February 08, 2005
KitMaker: 324 posts
Armorama: 295 posts
Joined: February 08, 2005
KitMaker: 324 posts
Armorama: 295 posts
Posted: Monday, May 12, 2014 - 06:52 AM UTC
Dear Hans,
thank you very much for your feed back.
I am not specialist in these, but I have what´s meant to be the LAW 80 and the dimensions are very different.
Also it lacks the typical handle and the standing out plastic covers.
I think I´ll ask Derek from AA what exactly he meant with this weapon
thank you very much for your feed back.
I am not specialist in these, but I have what´s meant to be the LAW 80 and the dimensions are very different.
Also it lacks the typical handle and the standing out plastic covers.
I think I´ll ask Derek from AA what exactly he meant with this weapon
ALBOWIE
New South Wales, Australia
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Joined: February 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,605 posts
Armorama: 1,565 posts
Posted: Monday, May 12, 2014 - 07:04 PM UTC
It is a poorly defined Bofors AT 4 which was supposed to be the LAW replacement
Al
Al
gogs007
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: February 03, 2007
KitMaker: 313 posts
Armorama: 285 posts
Joined: February 03, 2007
KitMaker: 313 posts
Armorama: 285 posts
Posted: Monday, May 12, 2014 - 09:44 PM UTC
Is it maybe a Milan,
barny
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 273 posts
Armorama: 272 posts
Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 273 posts
Armorama: 272 posts
Posted: Monday, May 12, 2014 - 10:05 PM UTC
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 - 02:07 AM UTC
skarik
Praha, Czech Republic
Joined: February 08, 2005
KitMaker: 324 posts
Armorama: 295 posts
Joined: February 08, 2005
KitMaker: 324 posts
Armorama: 295 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 - 05:23 AM UTC
Dear all,
Probably I confused you all with the poor photo I took (still I love my BlackBerry!). I just spoke to Derek from Accurate Armour who put this weapon in his set and he confirmed it was a Spanish made C90 Bunker Buster.
According to Wiki UK is not one of the users.
Thanks for all your tries and efforts
Jiri
Probably I confused you all with the poor photo I took (still I love my BlackBerry!). I just spoke to Derek from Accurate Armour who put this weapon in his set and he confirmed it was a Spanish made C90 Bunker Buster.
According to Wiki UK is not one of the users.
Thanks for all your tries and efforts
Jiri
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 - 05:59 PM UTC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C90-CR_(M3)
Methinks that Derek might have overdone the "thickness" of those octagonal "end caps", purely based on eyaballing the pictures ....
/ Robin