Hi everybody,
We all know this famous picture of Michael Wittmann:
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Wittmann#mediaviewer/Archivo:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-299-1802-08%2C_Nordfrankreich%2C_Michael_Wittmann_auf_Panzer_VI_%28Tiger_I%29.jpg
but I don't which Tiger (of the many Wittmann used) was that, anybody knows?
Also, I've noticed that AFV club Michael Wittmann Special includes decals with red numbers for Tiger 205, but I've seen a picture of that Tiger and the number is plain white (not red), in this url you can see the picture:
link
Am I wrong or AFV club's decals are not correct?
Hosted by Darren Baker
Michael Wittmann's Tigers

ruqui1

Joined: July 09, 2008
KitMaker: 45 posts
Armorama: 43 posts

Posted: Monday, May 26, 2014 - 04:25 AM UTC

panzerconor

Joined: February 08, 2012
KitMaker: 1,271 posts
Armorama: 1,253 posts

Posted: Monday, May 26, 2014 - 05:06 AM UTC
It's a Bundesarchiv photo and says it's from May of that year. It's most likely 205 as that was his Tiger at the time of the photo. There's really no way to know for sure, but Tiger 205 is probably the best option here. No idea what to tell you about the decals though. The red could be obscured in the photo?
-Conor
-Conor

Byrden

Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts

Posted: Monday, May 26, 2014 - 05:14 AM UTC
The number "205" in that photo really does appear to be white, perhaps toned down with dust or some light coloured overpaint. The fact that the "0" was made with a stencil reinforces this, because earlier that year all of the 3.co Tigers were given stencilled white numbers, but they were later overpainted as solid colour.
The Tiger in the posed photo has steel wheels, monocular gunsight, 40mm roof and a forged loader's hatch. We don't have enough photos of the battalion to track it down, but we can rule out some Tigers on that basis.
And on the basis of the camouflage paint, it's not "205".
David
The Tiger in the posed photo has steel wheels, monocular gunsight, 40mm roof and a forged loader's hatch. We don't have enough photos of the battalion to track it down, but we can rule out some Tigers on that basis.
And on the basis of the camouflage paint, it's not "205".
David

Byrden

Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts

Posted: Monday, May 26, 2014 - 05:42 AM UTC
The people at TIIF.DE think that it's "213" but they can't be sure.
David
David

ruqui1

Joined: July 09, 2008
KitMaker: 45 posts
Armorama: 43 posts

Posted: Monday, May 26, 2014 - 06:29 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The people at TIIF.DE think that it's "213" but they can't be sure.
David
You mean 231? Or Wittmann also had a "213"?

Byrden

Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts

Posted: Monday, May 26, 2014 - 06:42 AM UTC
There's no solid reason to suppose that it's his own Tiger. When a press photographer wants to pose a shot, he picks the Tiger that's in the best light.
David
David
![]() |