Hosted by Darren Baker
2 things about the M48A3
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2014 - 10:38 AM UTC
what type of mount was used for the cmdrs .50 atop the cupola and were the M60 type headlights used. this is for dragons non-mod B version. thx
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2014 - 10:48 AM UTC
The standard CDR cupola was the M1 Cupola with internal .50 cal. Some tool a piece of angle iron and a pintle mount and welded them on the top of the cupola to have an external mount .50 cal. When the external one was mounted, the internal one was usually removed.
The headlights were on a rounded mount with individual lights.
The headlights were on a rounded mount with individual lights.
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2014 - 10:56 AM UTC
was it the same for both for USMC and was the WWII type short pintle mount used, the one on a Jumbo, which is how I'm thinking on doing this one? I've got tams pintle mount that I might use
Tankrider
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,208 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,208 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2014 - 11:18 AM UTC
USMC tank battalion's varied on if they did or didn't "sky mount" their .50 caliber MGs outside of on top of the M1 Cupola. I want to say that 1st Tanks didn't use the externally mounted .50 caliber while 3rd Tanks did.
John
John
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2014 - 02:15 PM UTC
I'm assuming you mean line ahead in a road march and not position within a plt
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2014 - 02:16 PM UTC
No, he means 1st USMC Tank Bn and 3rd USMC Tank Bn. One Bn did, and the other Bn did not mount the external .50 cal.
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2014 - 10:10 PM UTC
ahh, ok thx that's settled. now, which decals are the more accurate for C23, tam or dragon? dragon doesn't have that on the turret side but it does have C23 and "disaster" on the gun tube, whereas tam doesn't.
Grindcore
New York, United States
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 389 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 389 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 26, 2014 - 11:43 PM UTC
Check out MecModels, they have some nice decal sheets for Viet Nam M48s, including "Disaster".
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, June 27, 2014 - 12:39 AM UTC
Quoted Text
ahh, ok thx that's settled. now, which decals are the more accurate for C23, tam or dragon? dragon doesn't have that on the turret side but it does have C23 and "disaster" on the gun tube, whereas tam doesn't.
Maybe a period picture would help ?
H.P.
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Friday, June 27, 2014 - 07:52 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Textahh, ok thx that's settled. now, which decals are the more accurate for C23, tam or dragon? dragon doesn't have that on the turret side but it does have C23 and "disaster" on the gun tube, whereas tam doesn't.
Maybe a period picture would help ?
H.P.
do you know when/where that is? it'd be perfect for doing up a copy. just need more spare links and cover for the searchlight
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, June 27, 2014 - 11:05 AM UTC
zapper
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Posted: Friday, June 27, 2014 - 09:24 PM UTC
There were many different ways of mounting the .50 on top of the cupola. One, as seen in Gino's photo above, was cutting the legs of the standard .50 cal tri-pod and welding the stumps to the cupola.
Cheers,
/E
Cheers,
/E
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, June 27, 2014 - 10:48 PM UTC
2 more examples :
I guess this one may come from a M113...
H.P.
I guess this one may come from a M113...
H.P.
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Friday, June 27, 2014 - 11:03 PM UTC
there's no way you're gonna make it easy for me, huh. for now, I'm limited to the supplied decals. pix are gonna be a guide for stowage tho
that weapon leaning against the cupola, what is it. doesn't look familiar
that weapon leaning against the cupola, what is it. doesn't look familiar
zapper
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Joined: October 18, 2005
KitMaker: 745 posts
Armorama: 734 posts
Posted: Friday, June 27, 2014 - 11:55 PM UTC
M3A1 sub machine gun, also known as 'grease gun'.
Cheers,
/E
Cheers,
/E
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 28, 2014 - 10:05 AM UTC
no wonder I didn't recognize it. Tamiya never did it justice, if their weapons kit is any indication
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 - 10:42 PM UTC
in keeping with "2 things" did any USMC M48 have a shafk mouth painted on the bow, and was the searchlight mounted with the mantlet cover in place. the DS cover dragon provided doesn't fit all that well over the mantlet, so I may have for forgo it
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 12:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
was the searchlight mounted with the mantlet cover in place.
Could be...
(reversed picture)
H.P.
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 09:00 AM UTC
keep in mind that with a twelve month rotation, the new owners would probably strip all the nicknames off the tank, and paint their own names on there.
I never saw a Marine tank with a sharkmouth, but who knows for sure. Yet I was around quite a few. Tobe exact I never saw a tank of anykind in I-Corp painted like that.
Those tanks in the first photograph are out of the "quarter CAV". They operated in and near the rubber plantations west of Saigon. Tough outfit with a very tough A.O. I have to send that picture to my brother inlaw as he was in B Troop 1/4 in 68 (the last group in Vietnam before the whole division left). That photo may have been taken at the final stand down.
In I-Corp the big end users of M48 tanks was the 5th Mech. Infantry in the far north. The 17th Cav had them as well as the 1st/1st CAV. But the 1/1 quit using them in the late summer of 68 when they swapped them for Sheridans. That pretty much narrows the A.O. to the coastline for Marines. But they did some op's as far as 60 klicks west in some areas. After that it was too mountainous for tracks. Got to know your exact time frame and unit.
gary
I never saw a Marine tank with a sharkmouth, but who knows for sure. Yet I was around quite a few. Tobe exact I never saw a tank of anykind in I-Corp painted like that.
Those tanks in the first photograph are out of the "quarter CAV". They operated in and near the rubber plantations west of Saigon. Tough outfit with a very tough A.O. I have to send that picture to my brother inlaw as he was in B Troop 1/4 in 68 (the last group in Vietnam before the whole division left). That photo may have been taken at the final stand down.
In I-Corp the big end users of M48 tanks was the 5th Mech. Infantry in the far north. The 17th Cav had them as well as the 1st/1st CAV. But the 1/1 quit using them in the late summer of 68 when they swapped them for Sheridans. That pretty much narrows the A.O. to the coastline for Marines. But they did some op's as far as 60 klicks west in some areas. After that it was too mountainous for tracks. Got to know your exact time frame and unit.
gary
sherb
New York, United States
Joined: August 25, 2004
KitMaker: 752 posts
Armorama: 378 posts
Joined: August 25, 2004
KitMaker: 752 posts
Armorama: 378 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 12:35 PM UTC
Quoted Text
the DS cover dragon provided doesn't fit all that well over the mantlet, so I may have for forgo it
If you're using the DS mantlet cover your supposed to leave off part F4, it's subassembly "N" in step 12. The DS mantlet cover fits really well.
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 05:42 PM UTC
Sorry for the off-topic picture in my last post. Here's another one :
H.P.
H.P.
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 08:11 PM UTC
great pix. this dragon is turning out quite nicely. still undecided on what decal to use
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 03, 2014 - 08:53 AM UTC
Regarding headlights, the type depended on which base model of M48 the vehicle began as before it was rebuilt into a diesel M48A3. If it was an M48A1, it had the round headlight guard and five return rollers. These were rebuilt into M48A3's in 1963.
The later combination headlight was used on the M48A2 and the M60 series. The M48A2's were rebuilt into M48A3's in 1968 (the M48A3 Model B or Model 1968), and retained the more modern headlight assembly. Like the M48A2, these had only three return rollers. Only a few outfits had them in Vietnam, as most equipment had been shipped over prior to that date. Newly deployed outfits did have the late version, though. Some of these later types also had the Y-shaped blast deflector seen on the prototype T-95 tanks around 1959.
The later combination headlight was used on the M48A2 and the M60 series. The M48A2's were rebuilt into M48A3's in 1968 (the M48A3 Model B or Model 1968), and retained the more modern headlight assembly. Like the M48A2, these had only three return rollers. Only a few outfits had them in Vietnam, as most equipment had been shipped over prior to that date. Newly deployed outfits did have the late version, though. Some of these later types also had the Y-shaped blast deflector seen on the prototype T-95 tanks around 1959.
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 03, 2014 - 10:53 PM UTC
wish I'd know about the headlights. the later version is included. however, it's almost done, made up of the parts given. gonna have to trim the lower edge of the mantlet cover as it's gonna interfere with the driver, when I get a crew. also had to remove the gunners sight and coax to get the cover to fit better. reused the searchlight mounting tabs, tho.
all the info here should be useful for afv clubs M48, assuming it didn't go the way of their jumbo sherman
all the info here should be useful for afv clubs M48, assuming it didn't go the way of their jumbo sherman
trakpin
Nova Scotia, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
Posted: Monday, July 07, 2014 - 10:39 PM UTC
it's finished, save for the decals. one thing I'm regretting. using that ds mantlet cover. it's a bit too big. trimmed what I could off the bottom, but it still makes contact with everything around it when fitting the turret, which means no driver hanging out the hatch. been wondering if maybe I could use tams mantlet