Hosted by Darren Baker
Marine M48A3 Mod B?
![](../../../photos.kitmaker.net/data/19815/thumbs/sabian_logo.jpg)
Belt_Fed
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: February 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,325 posts
![First Sergeant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/2_9.gif)
Posted: Saturday, June 28, 2014 - 12:08 PM UTC
Did the Marine Corps use any M48A3 Mod Bs? The Dragon kit has a Marine optiin in its decal sheet, but it is labeled for 1965, so i am skeptical of its accuracy.
![](../../../photos.kitmaker.net/data/19815/thumbs/1000w_q951.jpg)
HeavyArty
![Contributor's Award - This member has contributed content to Armorama in the past year.](../../images/contributor.gif)
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
![General of the Army](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.generalarmy.gif)
Posted: Sunday, June 29, 2014 - 01:55 PM UTC
Yes, the USMC used many M48A3 Mod Bs. The Dragon directions are wrong though, the Mod B was not fielded until 1967.
![](../../../photos.kitmaker.net/data/19815/thumbs/sabian_logo.jpg)
Belt_Fed
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: February 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,325 posts
![First Sergeant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/2_9.gif)
Posted: Sunday, June 29, 2014 - 03:10 PM UTC
Thank you, Gino
Tankrider
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,208 posts
![Colonel](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.colonel.gif)
Posted: Monday, June 30, 2014 - 02:12 AM UTC
Jon,
I would answer your question as no, not during Viet Nam (Ad far as I have seen...) and yes, post VN, until 1977-78, when the USMC upgraded to M60A1. There are numerous pictures of Post VN M48A3 Mod Bs or M48A3 Late Models, sporting Desert and other types of MERDC camo.
If your goal is to build an accurate USMC M48A3 in use in RVN, then use the newly released M48 from Dragon. The Mod B kit wouild build up as a post VN model but needs the searchlight and mantlet cover. As Gino mentioned, the decals dsicriptions are somewhat inaccurate in unit ID as well as time of use.
John
I would answer your question as no, not during Viet Nam (Ad far as I have seen...) and yes, post VN, until 1977-78, when the USMC upgraded to M60A1. There are numerous pictures of Post VN M48A3 Mod Bs or M48A3 Late Models, sporting Desert and other types of MERDC camo.
If your goal is to build an accurate USMC M48A3 in use in RVN, then use the newly released M48 from Dragon. The Mod B kit wouild build up as a post VN model but needs the searchlight and mantlet cover. As Gino mentioned, the decals dsicriptions are somewhat inaccurate in unit ID as well as time of use.
John
![](../../images/avatar/0103.png)
trakpin
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/ca.gif)
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 667 posts
Armorama: 639 posts
![Major](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.major.gif)
Posted: Monday, June 30, 2014 - 10:52 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Jon,
I would answer your question as no, not during Viet Nam (Ad far as I have seen...) and yes, post VN, until 1977-78, when the USMC upgraded to M60A1. There are numerous pictures of Post VN M48A3 Mod Bs or M48A3 Late Models, sporting Desert and other types of MERDC camo.
If your goal is to build an accurate USMC M48A3 in use in RVN, then use the newly released M48 from Dragon. The Mod B kit wouild build up as a post VN model but needs the searchlight and mantlet cover. As Gino mentioned, the decals dsicriptions are somewhat inaccurate in unit ID as well as time of use.
John
so, the non-modB M48A3 that dragon recently released, despite actually being a mod B, never saw the nam?. wish I hadn't forgotten to use tamiyas engine access doors cuz it seems like it woulda fit
![](../../../photos.kitmaker.net/data/19815/thumbs/sabian_logo.jpg)
Belt_Fed
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: February 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,325 posts
![First Sergeant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/2_9.gif)
Posted: Monday, June 30, 2014 - 11:58 PM UTC
Thank you for the info. I think I'll build up the Mod B as an Army vehicle and buil their A3 as a Marine vehicle just to be safe.
Tankrider
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,208 posts
![Colonel](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.colonel.gif)
Posted: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 - 01:03 AM UTC
Quoted Text
so, the non-modB M48A3 that dragon recently released, despite actually being a mod B, never saw the nam?. wish I hadn't forgotten to use tamiyas engine access doors cuz it seems like it woulda fit
As I said above, my research (both online as well as printed material) indicated to me at least that the USMC did not use the Mod B (DML's first M48A3 release)in VN. The DMLs second M48A3 release, forms a better base to build a USMC tank from 1967 onward. DML's M48A3 has the correct, earlier headlight configuration, fenders the searchlight (undersized) and the mantlet cover but it still needs work with removing the reinforcements on the engine grill doors, which is not really hard to do, with a sharp knife and some sandpaper.
John
![](../../images/avatar/000.gif)
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
![Lt. Colonel](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.ltcolonel.gif)
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2014 - 07:42 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
so, the non-modB M48A3 that dragon recently released, despite actually being a mod B, never saw the nam?. wish I hadn't forgotten to use tamiyas engine access doors cuz it seems like it woulda fit
As I said above, my research (both online as well as printed material) indicated to me at least that the USMC did not use the Mod B (DML's first M48A3 release)in VN. The DMLs second M48A3 release, forms a better base to build a USMC tank from 1967 onward. DML's M48A3 has the correct, earlier headlight configuration, fenders the searchlight (undersized) and the mantlet cover but it still needs work with removing the reinforcements on the engine grill doors, which is not really hard to do, with a sharp knife and some sandpaper.
John
your post is very correct
gary
![](../../images/avatar/Enterprise2.gif)
starfleet
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: September 10, 2011
KitMaker: 24 posts
Armorama: 19 posts
![2nd Lieutenant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.2nd_lt.gif)
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2014 - 08:46 AM UTC
looks like they did, check out these links.
http://armorama.com/forums/160136&page=1&ord=1
http://www.alphaonefive.com/3rd-platoon-alpha-company-
1st-tank-battalion/
http://mcvthf.org/names_logos.html
http://armorama.com/forums/160136&page=1&ord=1
http://www.alphaonefive.com/3rd-platoon-alpha-company-
1st-tank-battalion/
http://mcvthf.org/names_logos.html
![](../../../photos.kitmaker.net/data/19815/thumbs/SCTPI003S1.jpg)
Frenchy
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/fr.gif)
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
![General of the Army](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.generalarmy.gif)
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2014 - 09:14 AM UTC
Alfred
As far as I can tell, none of the tanks pictured in these links are M48A3 Mod B's....![](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/smilies/ohwell.gif)
H.P.
As far as I can tell, none of the tanks pictured in these links are M48A3 Mod B's....
![](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/smilies/ohwell.gif)
H.P.
![](../../images/avatar/Enterprise2.gif)
starfleet
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: September 10, 2011
KitMaker: 24 posts
Armorama: 19 posts
![2nd Lieutenant](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.2nd_lt.gif)
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2014 - 09:53 AM UTC
question was the raised commander's cupola on some of M-48 photos a field modification on the M48A3 and not M-48 mod B?
If so it will be an interesting conversion.
![](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/smilies/huh.gif)
![](../../../photos.kitmaker.net/data/19815/thumbs/1000w_q951.jpg)
HeavyArty
![Contributor's Award - This member has contributed content to Armorama in the past year.](../../images/contributor.gif)
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
![General of the Army](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.generalarmy.gif)
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2014 - 10:03 AM UTC
It was not necessarily a field mod per say. It was retro-fitted to M48A3s as they went in for rebuild and could be done at Main Support Bns in Vietnam.
![](../../../photos.kitmaker.net/data/12349/thumbs/Picture_00228.jpg)
uhu251
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: May 24, 2010
KitMaker: 6 posts
Armorama: 6 posts
![Airman Basic](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/blank.gif)
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2014 - 01:08 PM UTC
Tankrider
![Visit this Community](../../images/flags/us.gif)
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,208 posts
![Colonel](../../modules/SquawkBox/images/levels/rank.colonel.gif)
Posted: Friday, July 04, 2014 - 01:44 PM UTC
Nice pics John. It looks like the Cupola hatch was replaced when the G305 Riser was added to the tank.
John C
John C
![]() |