Hello,
I saw many nice projects in this forum, so I suppose someone here is able to help me with my problem. First, I will explain my plan: I am trying to build my city in a little diorama. And, for this, I want to build my own house. And my house has, like many, a chimney. Building the chimney is not the problem. But I am wondering if it is possible to let the chimney smoke. If you had an advice for me, I would be very greatful
Greetings, Melly
Dioramas
Do you love dioramas & vignettes? We sure do.
Do you love dioramas & vignettes? We sure do.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Smoking chimney?
Melly59
United States
Joined: June 30, 2014
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Joined: June 30, 2014
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Posted: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 - 09:37 PM UTC
kandahar
Tokyo-to, Japan / 日本
Joined: December 29, 2013
KitMaker: 52 posts
Armorama: 52 posts
Joined: December 29, 2013
KitMaker: 52 posts
Armorama: 52 posts
Posted: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 - 10:58 PM UTC
Model railway engines used to smoke. I believe that some kind of heated oil was involved. Maybe trying something similar would help.
Flanker1313
Krakow, Poland
Joined: June 14, 2014
KitMaker: 24 posts
Armorama: 24 posts
Joined: June 14, 2014
KitMaker: 24 posts
Armorama: 24 posts
Posted: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 - 11:00 PM UTC
Hello Melanie ! Maybe try something like this:
http://www.faller.de/App/WebObjects/XSeMIPS.woa/cms/page/pid.14.17.89/agid.1128.1196.1127.1202.1229/atid.1088/lg.en/ecm.at/index.html
This is smoke generator uses in train dioramas.
http://www.faller.de/App/WebObjects/XSeMIPS.woa/cms/page/pid.14.17.89/agid.1128.1196.1127.1202.1229/atid.1088/lg.en/ecm.at/index.html
This is smoke generator uses in train dioramas.
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 01:42 AM UTC
You might be disappointed with a locomotive smoke generator - the ones I've seen only make small intermittant puffs of smoke. If you don't want to go that way, you could use a piece of absorbent cotton (or a cotton ball) stretched out.
jrutman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 10, 2011
KitMaker: 7,941 posts
Armorama: 7,934 posts
Joined: April 10, 2011
KitMaker: 7,941 posts
Armorama: 7,934 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 04:22 AM UTC
I agree with Biggles here. In this case,with the cotton,less is better.
J
J
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 07:01 AM UTC
First thing to consider is, what is the fire burning? If it's wood there will be much less visible smoke than if it's coal. Peat is different again. Which fuel it is will depend where it's located and how good the local rail connections are. And even if it's coal, the smoke won't be black - it will be mid-grey and, unless there's a fault with the chimney, it won't come out in a dense cloud either.
SdAufKla
South Carolina, United States
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 - 01:44 PM UTC
+1 with Biggles and Jer, white cotton pulled into a slight wisp.
Less is better with this effect - just a hint of the smoke. Too much looks just like a stretched out cotton ball, too little disappears. However, between the two, too little is much better and more realistic than too much.
People see what they expect to see and their imagination easily fills in the rest. A cotton wisp coming from a chimney fools the viewer's eye into seeing smoke.
Less is better with this effect - just a hint of the smoke. Too much looks just like a stretched out cotton ball, too little disappears. However, between the two, too little is much better and more realistic than too much.
People see what they expect to see and their imagination easily fills in the rest. A cotton wisp coming from a chimney fools the viewer's eye into seeing smoke.