Dragon models offers a new variant of the Type 95 Ha Go with a late production model. Here is the in box review, with a build log to follow.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
Type 95 Ha-go late productionPosted: Monday, August 04, 2014 - 10:03 AM UTC
russamotto
Utah, United States
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
Posted: Monday, August 04, 2014 - 01:27 PM UTC
Darren, thanks for getting this posted. It is a great little kit.
philmmusic
Solothurn, Switzerland
Joined: August 06, 2014
KitMaker: 70 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Joined: August 06, 2014
KitMaker: 70 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Posted: Friday, August 08, 2014 - 03:38 AM UTC
Always like the odd tank, like French or Japanese. Nice review.
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - 10:37 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Dragon models offers a new variant of the Type 95 Ha Go with a late production model. Here is the in box review, with a build log to follow.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Thanks for the very concise review of DRAGON's Late HA-GO (Peleliu). Once again, DRAGON shines in their execution of an AXIS tank...
I wish that DRAGON would exert the same kind of effort IN CORRECTING THEIR US/ALLIED Armor and AFVs- Namely, their M3-based US Half Tracks, Jeeps, M4-series Tanks, M6A1, Post-War M48s, and M103A1 kits. But we all know that DRAGON won't bother correcting anything that isn't a WWII Axis model!!! I am still under-whelmed!!!
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 - 05:48 AM UTC
Were ALL the Ha-Go's tracks the same? No late or early versions? Where would I look to find out?
I agree about the DS tracks. This one needs to sag like crazy!
Nice review on a very interesting tank.
Jeff
I agree about the DS tracks. This one needs to sag like crazy!
Nice review on a very interesting tank.
Jeff
russamotto
Utah, United States
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 - 09:10 AM UTC
Thank you all for the comments.
Jeff, the tracks were the same. Japan made very few changes with their tanks, and comparatively built very few. I have seen aftermarket sets for workable indy links, starting at around $30.00.
Jeff, the tracks were the same. Japan made very few changes with their tanks, and comparatively built very few. I have seen aftermarket sets for workable indy links, starting at around $30.00.