Dragon models offers a new variant of the Type 95 Ha Go with a late production model. Here is the in box review, with a build log to follow.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
Type 95 Ha-go late productionPosted: Monday, August 04, 2014 - 10:03 AM UTC
russamotto
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46438/464381a85fafbebe8093f78736e9f19cd64d07ca" alt="Contributor's Award - This member has contributed content to Armorama in the past year."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1444a/1444abaebce1fceb360babad791575370f96af0d" alt="Command Sergeant Major"
Posted: Monday, August 04, 2014 - 01:27 PM UTC
Darren, thanks for getting this posted. It is a great little kit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7618d/7618dec8302d6f2731951f947e567ee494835825" alt=""
philmmusic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf715/bf71515a8047d999837f19e9c5fb795e53d8c120" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: August 06, 2014
KitMaker: 70 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2431a/2431a2b83c59190f013500e0c4228441c435359b" alt="2nd Lieutenant"
Posted: Friday, August 08, 2014 - 03:38 AM UTC
Always like the odd tank, like French or Japanese. Nice review.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7618d/7618dec8302d6f2731951f947e567ee494835825" alt=""
M4A1Sherman
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08563/085630d035bd873dfbd7c4e7d5bd92b329aa71f1" alt="General"
Posted: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 - 10:37 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Dragon models offers a new variant of the Type 95 Ha Go with a late production model. Here is the in box review, with a build log to follow.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Thanks for the very concise review of DRAGON's Late HA-GO (Peleliu). Once again, DRAGON shines in their execution of an AXIS tank...
I wish that DRAGON would exert the same kind of effort IN CORRECTING THEIR US/ALLIED Armor and AFVs- Namely, their M3-based US Half Tracks, Jeeps, M4-series Tanks, M6A1, Post-War M48s, and M103A1 kits. But we all know that DRAGON won't bother correcting anything that isn't a WWII Axis model!!! I am still under-whelmed!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b074/5b07441be94dd408624b499f0c33cccee964de0d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e592/7e5921bfde4a11bc7e5623fa964e3e17c80929a5" alt=""
PantherF
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d6f1/2d6f180b8830727115ffafa73c5d1cccaf4e1dc0" alt="Adjudant-majoor"
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 - 05:48 AM UTC
Were ALL the Ha-Go's tracks the same? No late or early versions?
Where would I look to find out?
I agree about the DS tracks. This one needs to sag like crazy!
Nice review on a very interesting tank.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5b5b/c5b5b9de3c60d0580a1f0bab6b96009cc2771520" alt=""
Jeff
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba5ad/ba5ad93369f2550cd86da2ee6d765e78490cb79f" alt=""
I agree about the DS tracks. This one needs to sag like crazy!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9573f/9573f47a165066b615a3a74165988984538e0f07" alt=""
Nice review on a very interesting tank.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5b5b/c5b5b9de3c60d0580a1f0bab6b96009cc2771520" alt=""
Jeff
russamotto
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46438/464381a85fafbebe8093f78736e9f19cd64d07ca" alt="Contributor's Award - This member has contributed content to Armorama in the past year."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: December 14, 2007
KitMaker: 3,389 posts
Armorama: 2,054 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1444a/1444abaebce1fceb360babad791575370f96af0d" alt="Command Sergeant Major"
Posted: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 - 09:10 AM UTC
Thank you all for the comments.
Jeff, the tracks were the same. Japan made very few changes with their tanks, and comparatively built very few. I have seen aftermarket sets for workable indy links, starting at around $30.00.
Jeff, the tracks were the same. Japan made very few changes with their tanks, and comparatively built very few. I have seen aftermarket sets for workable indy links, starting at around $30.00.
![]() |