hmmmm.. looks like they didn't do much but add a new turret to an existing hull .. David isn't the hull a bit too late for the prototype ?? I have no idea but seems to me some of the features are off.. I'm sure you'll set Dragon straight before the kit comes out .
Rick
Byrden
Wien, Austria Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Yes, Richard, this turret would have existed from Tiger 250100 onwards if it had been used; it would be on the Bovington Tiger. So, I am suggesting that they use an Early hull rather than a Mid. But they're both equally valid.
David
Headhunter506
New York, United States Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
I'm liking this specifically for the hull. I could get a few of these, use some aftermarket Early/Mid turrets and I can forego fishing for discontinued and overpriced (in some cases) DML Tiger I kits. But, hey, that's just me.
http://hitemlowandhard.blogspot.com
bombertom
United States Joined: March 13, 2014
KitMaker: 24 posts
Armorama: 24 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 - 04:07 AM UTC
I'm now checking the final box images for this kit. You may be interested to know that the hull is from the same era as the recent Dragon kit #9142, that is, about April 1943. The hull roof plate has been changed to accommodate the different turret. I don't yet know what they've done with the wheels, but I'll keep you posted.
David
Byrden
Wien, Austria Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts