I have a question for the Churchill folks regarding the fenders and track covers. Is there a reason that the various parts will be missing and it looks not to "accidents", but planned removal of parts? It seems all of the AVREs had the front fenders removed and some vehicles have the entire section covering the tracks removed.
Was this vehicle specific or unit based?
Hosted by Darren Baker
churchill question
AikinutNY
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 - 11:41 AM UTC
Posted: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 - 12:45 PM UTC
Possibly to do with track changes.
thebear
Quebec, Canada
Joined: November 15, 2002
KitMaker: 3,960 posts
Armorama: 3,579 posts
Joined: November 15, 2002
KitMaker: 3,960 posts
Armorama: 3,579 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 - 01:37 PM UTC
I have read that some parts were removed because it was found that even slightly bent fenders could jam the turret from turning... So better safe than sorry and remove them before it could happen in combat.
Rick
Rick
Kevlar06
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 - 01:42 PM UTC
Jim,
A couple of years ago, I built Tamiya's Crocodile with a scratch-built full interior, Fruil tracks, and a load of details. My intent was to display it in a diorama with US troops during the capture of he Cherbourg peninsula, since the US was dependent on the British for flame thrower support. I removed the top run of fender after doing some research. There is a great book by Ampersand which covers the Churchill "Funnies". In the book they mention the front fenders were removed when damaged to allow dirt to pass out the front over the track. More intriguing was the removal of the top run of fenders beside the turret. This was done because the fenders around the turret had very little clearance between the track and the bottom of the fender, and the turret would need to pass over this area. Since the track "slid" on top of runners around the hull, the fenders could bend upwards and jam the turret. Hope this is helpful.
VR, Russ
A couple of years ago, I built Tamiya's Crocodile with a scratch-built full interior, Fruil tracks, and a load of details. My intent was to display it in a diorama with US troops during the capture of he Cherbourg peninsula, since the US was dependent on the British for flame thrower support. I removed the top run of fender after doing some research. There is a great book by Ampersand which covers the Churchill "Funnies". In the book they mention the front fenders were removed when damaged to allow dirt to pass out the front over the track. More intriguing was the removal of the top run of fenders beside the turret. This was done because the fenders around the turret had very little clearance between the track and the bottom of the fender, and the turret would need to pass over this area. Since the track "slid" on top of runners around the hull, the fenders could bend upwards and jam the turret. Hope this is helpful.
VR, Russ
SdAufKla
South Carolina, United States
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Joined: May 07, 2010
KitMaker: 2,238 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 - 02:09 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I have read that some parts were removed because it was found that even slightly bent fenders could jam the turret from turning... So better safe than sorry and remove them before it could happen in combat.
Rick
Rick's very right about this. This modification also appears to be more common with some units than others, and just from looking at photos, it would appear more common in Italy than later in NWE.
The hinged front fender parts also seem to be commonly removed from many Churchills that appear to have had longer service. This might be because it would have been faster and easier to adjust the track tension without these fender parts in the way (or perhaps they just got too damaged to be serviceable after extensive use).
AikinutNY
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 - 02:25 PM UTC
Thanks for the input. I guess I will build one Churchill in factory fresh condition and the rest in various conditions, some fenders missing and atleast one without any at all.
I am looking at the AVRE with Snake for my stash. How far away was the Snake assemble before pushing it into the mine field? How did they "steer" it? pushing a long pipe from behind is not very accurate, once it hit a slope or an obstacle it will change direction. Or was this it serious shortcoming?
What happened to the ARK crews? were they used to replace lost crew members in the other combat Churchills? How many were in the crew?
I am looking at the AVRE with Snake for my stash. How far away was the Snake assemble before pushing it into the mine field? How did they "steer" it? pushing a long pipe from behind is not very accurate, once it hit a slope or an obstacle it will change direction. Or was this it serious shortcoming?
What happened to the ARK crews? were they used to replace lost crew members in the other combat Churchills? How many were in the crew?
easyco69
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 - 03:43 PM UTC
artillery or near AT misses could also rip off fenders?
Posted: Friday, September 05, 2014 - 08:32 AM UTC
Quoted Text
artillery or near AT misses could also rip off fenders?
Well, Arty, more than AT, but Jim was specifically asking about fenders that appeared to have been purposefully removed as oppoed to removed by shellfire.