An unboxing video and photos of the recently released 251/1 German Heavy Rocket Launcher from Zvezda in 1/35 scale.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
REVIEW
Sd.Kfz 251/1 Ausf.B Stuka Zu FussPosted: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 - 11:58 PM UTC
Thudius
Uusimaa, Finland
Joined: October 22, 2012
KitMaker: 1,194 posts
Armorama: 1,077 posts
Joined: October 22, 2012
KitMaker: 1,194 posts
Armorama: 1,077 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 22, 2015 - 12:56 AM UTC
That looks pretty nice. No idea on the accuracy side but a neat looking kit to be sure.
Kimmo
Kimmo
Posted: Thursday, January 22, 2015 - 09:20 PM UTC
From what I see of the still photos, first class molding and excellent detail! Look at that engine serpentine belt and pulleys.
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 22, 2015 - 09:29 PM UTC
I wonder how it stacks up against the Dragon and AFV Club kits?
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 02:03 PM UTC
There was an Internet "battle" over which company got the SdKfz 251 hull dimensions right, AFV Club or Dragon, and the Panzer Tracts drawings suggest it was AFV Club. Dragon's kits were narrower by several scale inches. Zvezda's versions fall right in the middle, width-wise, so they're visually compatible with either. Zvezda had no photos or drawings of the interior of the Ausf. B, so they just duplicated the Ausf. C parts (which are wrong--the early halftracks did not have enclosed bins under the passenger seats). Surprisingly, Eduard's photo etch set for the Zvezda kit actually corrects this. Zvezda's upper body lines up exactly with the lower body sides, but actually should overhang them by a fraction of an inch (it casts a noticeable shadow on the real machine). If you're ambitious, you could gently scrape down the outer face of the lower hull with an X-acto knife to create this step (the plastic is thick).
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 02:53 PM UTC
Very informative, Jim and Gerald. A note on the overhang. Could you add thin styrene sheet to the upper hull to correct it?
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 09:47 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Very informative, Jim and Gerald. A note on the overhang. Could you add thin styrene sheet to the upper hull to correct it?
Remember, it's an open-topped vehicle, so the upper edge of the body is exposed--you'd have a light infantry carrier with armor seemingly two inches thick, if you added plastic sheet to the top faces. Beveling the lower half is easier to conceal, once you've added fenders and stowage boxes.
yeahwiggie
Dalarnas, Sweden
Joined: March 24, 2006
KitMaker: 2,093 posts
Armorama: 1,359 posts
Joined: March 24, 2006
KitMaker: 2,093 posts
Armorama: 1,359 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 11:48 AM UTC
A word of caution though...
The Zvezda kit is not for beginners. It does have fit-issues, like upper/lower hull and tracks.
That being said I'd build another any day, simply because it is the only Ausf.B on the market.
The Zvezda kit is not for beginners. It does have fit-issues, like upper/lower hull and tracks.
That being said I'd build another any day, simply because it is the only Ausf.B on the market.
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 03:57 PM UTC
Other than fit issues, is it comparable to the Tamiya kit? I know the AFV Club is the most accurate, but the price difference is great enough to consider some extra work.
Giovanni1508
Napoli, Italy
Joined: April 17, 2014
KitMaker: 652 posts
Armorama: 600 posts
Joined: April 17, 2014
KitMaker: 652 posts
Armorama: 600 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 04:11 PM UTC
Hi Jim,
very nice kit and good informations, with many details.
Noted the decals of instruments for the dashboard. It could be useful, instead of painting.
Cheers
Giovanni
very nice kit and good informations, with many details.
Noted the decals of instruments for the dashboard. It could be useful, instead of painting.
Cheers
Giovanni
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 08:59 PM UTC
What are the price ranges for the Zvezda halftracks?
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Monday, January 26, 2015 - 09:11 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Other than fit issues, is it comparable to the Tamiya kit? I know the AFV Club is the most accurate, but the price difference is great enough to consider some extra work.
It is not Tamiya quality, not even remotely, but for a B version, it is the only game in town, and if you have a Dragon or AFV Club kit lying around, you might want to pirate some of the better parts, like the road wheels. There is a very detailed review on the Perth Military Modelling Site:
http://www.perthmilitarymodelling.com/reviews/vehicles/zvezda/zvezda3572.html