Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Dragon: Up-Armored Early PanzerPosted: Friday, January 23, 2015 - 08:25 PM UTC
An announcement from Dragon Models has an early Panzer IV with added armor on the way.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 12:13 AM UTC
Cool early Panzer got to have this.
nng-nng
Bayern, Germany
Joined: October 22, 2013
KitMaker: 380 posts
Armorama: 376 posts
Joined: October 22, 2013
KitMaker: 380 posts
Armorama: 376 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 12:27 AM UTC
Alright, made me at least raise an eybrow...
Would be interresting if it is simmilar to the "old" Ausf A kit. Not shure whatīs the deal about the new PE, but Iīd be interrested, if itīs still in the line of those famous "super kits"
Would be interresting if it is simmilar to the "old" Ausf A kit. Not shure whatīs the deal about the new PE, but Iīd be interrested, if itīs still in the line of those famous "super kits"
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 04:37 AM UTC
WOW!!! DS tracks!
johhar
Alabama, United States
Joined: September 22, 2008
KitMaker: 476 posts
Armorama: 447 posts
Joined: September 22, 2008
KitMaker: 476 posts
Armorama: 447 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2015 - 05:19 AM UTC
Supposedly based on 6747, which was an enjoyable kit to build, though I can't speak to historical/technical accuracy. My personal thing is to have individual tracks included as an option.
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2015 - 09:15 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Supposedly based on 6747, which was an enjoyable kit to build, though I can't speak to historical/technical accuracy. My personal thing is to have individual tracks included as an option.
Hi, All! I question DRAGON's wisdom of supplying "DS" tracks in their German WWII subjects, although I successfully used them in building a couple of my Tiger Is- Since the "DS" tracks respond to plastic cement quite well, I was able to shape said "DS" tracks to represent the proper "track-sag".
My "secret" is simply to apply cyano-glue or liquid plastic cement to the upper inside surfaces of the "DS" track so that it doesn't show, and shape it to the required "track-sag" in the right places before the cement has a chance to dry...
I like DRAGON's "DS" tracks best on US WWII and present-day armor, since nearly all US armor makes use of "live" tracks, which require tight adjustment, i.e, virtually no "track-sag". Notable exceptions are the M113 APC and M551 "Sheridan" Light "Airborne" tanks.
In my opinion, DRAGON should have stuck with their individual "Magic Track" kit-supplied plastic indy-links, which are OK as far as I'm concerned. Many of my fellow modellers will go to the extra expense of replacing either of DRAGON's "Magic Track"/"DS" tracks by buying after-market white metal track links such as FRIULMODELISMO, etc. So the non-use of kit-supplied tracks becomes a moot point.
Naturally, DRAGON would want to save their money by replacing their "Magic Tracks" with "DS" tracks, as I'm sure many other kit manufacturers would have done, if they had the patent on styrene-based flexible tracks. To a dedicated modeller of 1/35 WWII German AFVs, the use of DRAGON's "DS" tracks becomes a decidedly retrograde step in quality. For myself, it's not a big issue, since for the last 10 years or so, I've been concentrating on 1/35 US/Allied subjects, anyway...