Anyone recommend a good T34 kit or any other WW2 soviet armor?
Just thought I have a change from German armor and would like to tackle something in green
Regards
Karl
Hosted by Jacques Duquette
Never built a T34
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 26, 2015 - 11:59 AM UTC
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 26, 2015 - 12:21 PM UTC
The early Dragon T-34s are nice, particularly the ones up to the 1941 models. Trumpeter's KV1 and 2 are generally pretty good too - Neil Stokes's site 4BOgreen.com is very useful for modelling the latter.
No doubt there are others worthy of consideration such as Tamiya's IS-2, although I don't have direct experience of that one.
No doubt there are others worthy of consideration such as Tamiya's IS-2, although I don't have direct experience of that one.
dsfraser
Alberta, Canada
Joined: October 01, 2007
KitMaker: 172 posts
Armorama: 168 posts
Joined: October 01, 2007
KitMaker: 172 posts
Armorama: 168 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 26, 2015 - 02:39 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The early Dragon T-34s are nice, particularly the ones up to the 1941 models. Trumpeter's KV1 and 2 are generally pretty good too - Neil Stokes's site 4BOgreen.com is very useful for modelling the latter.
No doubt there are others worthy of consideration such as Tamiya's IS-2, although I don't have direct experience of that one.
The Tamiya IS-2 is excellent and their BT-7s practically build themselves. DML's #6418 is probably the pick of the litter as far as T-34s.
Regards
Scott Fraser
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 26, 2015 - 06:24 PM UTC
I have been looking around and I think it might have to be the Dragon T34/85 the one with the bed spring armor.
I looked at Afv Clubs kit with full interior but the tracks put me off,the Zvezda kit is cheap but looks like it lacks a lot of detail.
Tamiyas JS-2 might be a good kit and has both link and length and rubber tracks.
Thanks for your recommendations
Karl
I looked at Afv Clubs kit with full interior but the tracks put me off,the Zvezda kit is cheap but looks like it lacks a lot of detail.
Tamiyas JS-2 might be a good kit and has both link and length and rubber tracks.
Thanks for your recommendations
Karl
GarethM
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 119 posts
Armorama: 118 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 119 posts
Armorama: 118 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 26, 2015 - 07:25 PM UTC
Currently building Alanger's T-35, which is basically a reboxing of the ICM kit. It certainly isn't an easy build, but it's something out of the ordinary. I hear Hobby Boss's kit is better, but it doesn't include the partial interior, so there's a bit of a tradeoff to be had.
easyco69
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 26, 2015 - 07:38 PM UTC
Dragon makes several T-34 versions. All are good kits & you get your $'s worth.
AFV Club make a couple T-34/85 kits with full interior. You also get your $'s worth. Bronco does a T-34/85
Tamiya has old mold T-34's
AFV Club make a couple T-34/85 kits with full interior. You also get your $'s worth. Bronco does a T-34/85
Tamiya has old mold T-34's
Youngun
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 10, 2010
KitMaker: 587 posts
Armorama: 550 posts
Joined: November 10, 2010
KitMaker: 587 posts
Armorama: 550 posts
Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 - 12:22 AM UTC
Having built Dragon and AFV club T-34's I say go for the AFV club ones. They can usually be found for around the same money as the dragon ones but come with full interiors and have excellent detail.
Tojo72
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 - 12:29 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I have been looking around and I think it might have to be the Dragon T34/85 the one with the bed spring armor.
I looked at Afv Clubs kit with full interior but the tracks put me off,the Zvezda kit is cheap but looks like it lacks a lot of detail.
Tamiyas JS-2 might be a good kit and has both link and length and rubber tracks.
Thanks for your recommendations
Karl
Excellent choice.It builds into a nice kit.The Magic Tracks are easy to use especially on a T-34 so they won't be a problem.
I also have that AFV kit Ing in my stash.I agree about the tracks but someone sold me a set of MT'S cheap.
americanpanzer
Iowa, United States
Joined: May 12, 2014
KitMaker: 542 posts
Armorama: 539 posts
Joined: May 12, 2014
KitMaker: 542 posts
Armorama: 539 posts
Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 - 12:50 AM UTC
if you can find them Tamiya has a T-34/76 and T-34/85; older kits but good to start with; their JSU-152 is a good one as well as some of Dragon's offerings, mostly newer ones; depends on budget and how many parts you want to mess with. check company websites or Squadron.com
dsfraser
Alberta, Canada
Joined: October 01, 2007
KitMaker: 172 posts
Armorama: 168 posts
Joined: October 01, 2007
KitMaker: 172 posts
Armorama: 168 posts
Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 - 12:20 PM UTC
Viper_msk
Moscow City, Russia
Joined: February 14, 2015
KitMaker: 53 posts
Armorama: 53 posts
Joined: February 14, 2015
KitMaker: 53 posts
Armorama: 53 posts
Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 - 05:09 PM UTC
I wouldn't recommend starting to build Soviet AFVs with a T-34.
It is an EXTREMELY complex subject - as T-34s were built at 4 different factories, which not only had their own specifics, but also made significant modifications to the "reference architecture" of a T-34.
Thus, building a "real" T-34 model, and not just "ridiculous something that is at best approximately similar to a T-34" is a very complex exercise that would require several weeks of study & planning before even unpacking the sprues.
And the level of details in the kits is not an indicator at all of their accuracy or match to the name written on the box. Most of the kit manufacturers that ever built a T-34 never bothered to study the details - thus all their kits require significant extra work - and, for example, despite the obvious differences in the level of detail, Zvezda's and Dragon's kits require similar efforts to be corrected to a "true T-34".
Tamiya's T-34 and SU-xxx kits are the furthest from reality - with SO many mistakes (e.g. largely incorrect geometrical sizes and even angles of the hull plates) that, in my opinion, they can't even be considered a model - they could only serve training purposes (e.g. if you need to build something very quickly to practice painting skills) or be a first model for newcomers that need practice with filing, gluing, and overall kit assembly.
What I WOULD recommend is to start building Soviet armor with Trumpeter KV-1 and KV-2 kits - their early KV's (e.g. KV-1 "s ekranami" and 1941 KV-2) almost perfectly match the prototypes and are quite good to build.
It is an EXTREMELY complex subject - as T-34s were built at 4 different factories, which not only had their own specifics, but also made significant modifications to the "reference architecture" of a T-34.
Thus, building a "real" T-34 model, and not just "ridiculous something that is at best approximately similar to a T-34" is a very complex exercise that would require several weeks of study & planning before even unpacking the sprues.
And the level of details in the kits is not an indicator at all of their accuracy or match to the name written on the box. Most of the kit manufacturers that ever built a T-34 never bothered to study the details - thus all their kits require significant extra work - and, for example, despite the obvious differences in the level of detail, Zvezda's and Dragon's kits require similar efforts to be corrected to a "true T-34".
Tamiya's T-34 and SU-xxx kits are the furthest from reality - with SO many mistakes (e.g. largely incorrect geometrical sizes and even angles of the hull plates) that, in my opinion, they can't even be considered a model - they could only serve training purposes (e.g. if you need to build something very quickly to practice painting skills) or be a first model for newcomers that need practice with filing, gluing, and overall kit assembly.
What I WOULD recommend is to start building Soviet armor with Trumpeter KV-1 and KV-2 kits - their early KV's (e.g. KV-1 "s ekranami" and 1941 KV-2) almost perfectly match the prototypes and are quite good to build.
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 - 08:14 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I wouldn't recommend starting to build Soviet AFVs with a T-34.
It is an EXTREMELY complex subject - as T-34s were built at 4 different factories, which not only had their own specifics, but also made significant modifications to the "reference architecture" of a T-34.
Thus, building a "real" T-34 model, and not just "ridiculous something that is at best approximately similar to a T-34" is a very complex exercise that would require several weeks of study & planning before even unpacking the sprues.
And the level of details in the kits is not an indicator at all of their accuracy or match to the name written on the box. Most of the kit manufacturers that ever built a T-34 never bothered to study the details - thus all their kits require significant extra work - and, for example, despite the obvious differences in the level of detail, Zvezda's and Dragon's kits require similar efforts to be corrected to a "true T-34".
Tamiya's T-34 and SU-xxx kits are the furthest from reality - with SO many mistakes (e.g. largely incorrect geometrical sizes and even angles of the hull plates) that, in my opinion, they can't even be considered a model - they could only serve training purposes (e.g. if you need to build something very quickly to practice painting skills) or be a first model for newcomers that need practice with filing, gluing, and overall kit assembly.
What I WOULD recommend is to start building Soviet armor with Trumpeter KV-1 and KV-2 kits - their early KV's (e.g. KV-1 "s ekranami" and 1941 KV-2) almost perfectly match the prototypes and are quite good to build.
Good points there Phil,I like the 34s for their sleek looking profile plus when I look at some models of the T34 they always look really beat up and well weathered.
Am not much of a rivet counter and I would not know the true measurements of the real vehicle so not too worried about that.
I shall have a look at the KVs as am sure the Trumpeters kits are quite cheap.
Thanks all who have taken their time to post
Karl
dsfraser
Alberta, Canada
Joined: October 01, 2007
KitMaker: 172 posts
Armorama: 168 posts
Joined: October 01, 2007
KitMaker: 172 posts
Armorama: 168 posts
Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 - 10:39 PM UTC
I wouldn't be afraid of DML's T-34s. There are around thirty on the market and while some of them have issues, they are still the best on the market.
If you want a tank from 1941, #6418 is the one to get. It is a tank from KhPZ (Kharkov Locomotive factory) Zavod No.183 with cast turret. Parts are also included for the welded turret.
If you want a tank from 1944 or 1945, DML's T-34-85 #6266 is the one to get. Both kits include some etch, an aluminum barrel and individual track links, features that are not included in most of the other kits.
For a mid-war T-34, #6424 is probably the one to choose, but it lacks some of the whistles and bells the kits I've mentioned include. It represents a T-34 from UTZ with softedge turret.
Also worth considering, albeit with more limited scope, are the CyberHobby kits #6452 for an early (1942) Krasnoe Sormovo T-34 or #6355 for a T-34 from STZ at the end of 1941. They may be harder to find and will be more expensive, but they are both excellent kits.
With any of these kits, there are minor details that could be improved, but for the most part they are accurate and build easily into an accurate replica of the T-34.
Check out the reviews on the PMMS page I linked above and decide for yourself. Don't be put off by the post above. T-34s are complicated, but sometimes DML got it right.
Regards
Scott Fraser
If you want a tank from 1941, #6418 is the one to get. It is a tank from KhPZ (Kharkov Locomotive factory) Zavod No.183 with cast turret. Parts are also included for the welded turret.
If you want a tank from 1944 or 1945, DML's T-34-85 #6266 is the one to get. Both kits include some etch, an aluminum barrel and individual track links, features that are not included in most of the other kits.
For a mid-war T-34, #6424 is probably the one to choose, but it lacks some of the whistles and bells the kits I've mentioned include. It represents a T-34 from UTZ with softedge turret.
Also worth considering, albeit with more limited scope, are the CyberHobby kits #6452 for an early (1942) Krasnoe Sormovo T-34 or #6355 for a T-34 from STZ at the end of 1941. They may be harder to find and will be more expensive, but they are both excellent kits.
With any of these kits, there are minor details that could be improved, but for the most part they are accurate and build easily into an accurate replica of the T-34.
Check out the reviews on the PMMS page I linked above and decide for yourself. Don't be put off by the post above. T-34s are complicated, but sometimes DML got it right.
Regards
Scott Fraser
Tojo72
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 - 10:52 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextI wouldn't recommend starting to build Soviet AFVs with a T-34.
It is an EXTREMELY complex subject - as T-34s were built at 4 different factories, which not only had their own specifics, but also made significant modifications to the "reference architecture" of a T-34.
Thus, building a "real" T-34 model, and not just "ridiculous something that is at best approximately similar to a T-34" is a very complex exercise that would require several weeks of study & planning before even unpacking the sprues.
And the level of details in the kits is not an indicator at all of their accuracy or match to the name written on the box. Most of the kit manufacturers that ever built a T-34 never bothered to study the details - thus all their kits require significant extra work - and, for example, despite the obvious differences in the level of detail, Zvezda's and Dragon's kits require similar efforts to be corrected to a "true T-34".
Tamiya's T-34 and SU-xxx kits are the furthest from reality - with SO many mistakes (e.g. largely incorrect geometrical sizes and even angles of the hull plates) that, in my opinion, they can't even be considered a model - they could only serve training purposes (e.g. if you need to build something very quickly to practice painting skills) or be a first model for newcomers that need practice with filing, gluing, and overall kit assembly.
What I WOULD recommend is to start building Soviet armor with Trumpeter KV-1 and KV-2 kits - their early KV's (e.g. KV-1 "s ekranami" and 1941 KV-2) almost perfectly match the prototypes and are quite good to build.
Good points there Phil,I like the 34s for their sleek looking profile plus when I look at some models of the T34 they always look really beat up and well weathered.
Am not much of a rivet counter and I would not know the true measurements of the real vehicle so not too worried about that.
I shall have a look at the KVs as am sure the Trumpeters kits are quite cheap.
Thanks all who have taken their time to post
Karl
I'm with you,if it looks like a T-34 it works for me.