Quoted Text
Alpine already has a nice niche and is filling said niche fantastically IMHO so why fix what ain't broken?
^ This.
By now I think we are all well familiar with what Alpine does and I think it is also obvious by now that it works very well for many. For other type of poses there are other manufacturers, why do we have to try compare the two when there is clearly no comparison?
I have every one of Alpines US figure sets ( as well as various Corsair Rex, Evolution, SKP, Mantis, Bravo 6, Masterclub etc.) in static poses, and as someone who builds and *completes* models based on small vignettes with groundwork and only one or two figures on a fairly regular basis, these figures are exactly what the scene needs to raise an otherwise boring stand alone model to that of a scene with scale and context. I just don't need sets of thirty guys running, sleeping, shooting, drinking, etc. filling up the shelves in my stash that I'll never build to completion.
Having said, I am a staunch follower of the statement, 'to each their own'. I just fail to see the point in projecting ones own needs and desires that are fulfilled by other manufacturers on one who doesn't fulfill them, versus simply ignoring said companies release announcements. I think those Stalingrad sets are amazing, (and I've already seen them all) but they don't interest me so I ignore their release announcements instead of asking why they don't concentrate on much more 'droll' subjects. To me, it's akin to walking into a restaurant I don't like and telling everyone why I don't eat there. Clearly the clientèle does, so what's the purpose? I'm just not seeing one.
*
and I'm not trying to single anyone out here, it's merely something I see internet modelers as a whole doing constantly on message forums and social media ad nauseumBuild what you like, like what you build