I wanna know if the commanders of German tanks still put their heads outside the cupola for observe if they are in battle,or they use the periscope?
How about Wittman?what way did he fight?
also any good history web site?
Thanks
Tim
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
German Tank battle question
Timlo
Hong Kong S.A.R. / 繁體
Joined: November 02, 2003
KitMaker: 150 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: November 02, 2003
KitMaker: 150 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Friday, January 23, 2004 - 05:00 PM UTC
mikeli125
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
Posted: Friday, January 23, 2004 - 11:11 PM UTC
tim the comanders had periscopes in the copolas in tigers and panthers I think the others had vision slots stugs and Jagpanthers often had scissor type periscope stiking out a hatch but I'd guess many would look out the turret to use bino's
greatbrit
United Kingdom
Joined: May 14, 2003
KitMaker: 2,127 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Joined: May 14, 2003
KitMaker: 2,127 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Posted: Friday, January 23, 2004 - 11:17 PM UTC
im not ure what you mean,
but once a tank is closed down, the periscopes provide greatly reduced vision,
so it was common for tank commanders to have their heads at least outside the tank, to give better vision, and possibly give hand signals to other tanks, infantry etc.
if your asking would it be feasible to model a tank with its commander exposed in the cupola, i would say yes!
cheers
joe
but once a tank is closed down, the periscopes provide greatly reduced vision,
so it was common for tank commanders to have their heads at least outside the tank, to give better vision, and possibly give hand signals to other tanks, infantry etc.
if your asking would it be feasible to model a tank with its commander exposed in the cupola, i would say yes!
cheers
joe
deadman
Istanbul, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: May 12, 2002
KitMaker: 90 posts
Armorama: 85 posts
Joined: May 12, 2002
KitMaker: 90 posts
Armorama: 85 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 12:54 AM UTC
hi,
Otto Carius wrote (in his book "tigers in the mud")the difference between russian tanker commanders and german commanders, which was russians always buckle up to the smallest hole so they dont have a clear vision of the battlefield, but german commanders always( at least carius) direct the battles while their waist up exposed.
That way they can see the infantry formations better and see the tanks when they are too close to see from vision holes or periscopes.
Actually carius was injured for the first time when he was directing a battle in eastern front and those early produting cupola of his tiger was his by an AT gun. Luckly he was ducked inside to light a cigarette at that time but cupola flew away from its weld points.
if i find the exact paragraph when he talks about russian tankers, i ll post it here. I need to dig into the book.
Thanks,
Orkun
Otto Carius wrote (in his book "tigers in the mud")the difference between russian tanker commanders and german commanders, which was russians always buckle up to the smallest hole so they dont have a clear vision of the battlefield, but german commanders always( at least carius) direct the battles while their waist up exposed.
That way they can see the infantry formations better and see the tanks when they are too close to see from vision holes or periscopes.
Actually carius was injured for the first time when he was directing a battle in eastern front and those early produting cupola of his tiger was his by an AT gun. Luckly he was ducked inside to light a cigarette at that time but cupola flew away from its weld points.
if i find the exact paragraph when he talks about russian tankers, i ll post it here. I need to dig into the book.
Thanks,
Orkun
Pnzr-Cmdr
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: July 16, 2003
KitMaker: 483 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 16, 2003
KitMaker: 483 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 04:07 AM UTC
just watch some episodes of band of brothers,, like episde 3 Carentan. most of the commanders are outside halfway out of the cupolas giving commands
IDHUNTER
Idaho, United States
Joined: December 09, 2003
KitMaker: 87 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: December 09, 2003
KitMaker: 87 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 24, 2004 - 06:58 AM UTC
Deaman is right. German tank commanders primarily operated with at least their head exposed. The main reason for this is that the cuppola was very cramped and although they had vision ports all around, it was difficult to rotate their bodies around so that they had complete, all around vision. The placement of the cuppola also increased the difficulty of seeing out the right side of the tank. Obviously when there was enemy infantry around or they were under an artillery strike they would drop down inside the turret.
Whitman did fight this way. I've read "TIger Ace; The Life Story of Michael Whitman" and in that he talks about the difficulties of operating in the cuppola as well as mentions near misses while his head/ torso was exposed. I think this behavior was dictated but the conditions and not necessarily any specific doctrine or training.
Whitman did fight this way. I've read "TIger Ace; The Life Story of Michael Whitman" and in that he talks about the difficulties of operating in the cuppola as well as mentions near misses while his head/ torso was exposed. I think this behavior was dictated but the conditions and not necessarily any specific doctrine or training.
ave
Klang, Malaysia
Joined: March 24, 2003
KitMaker: 417 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 24, 2003
KitMaker: 417 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 12:32 AM UTC
But wouldent that be a bit suicidal what with all the bullets and shrapenel flying around?
slodder
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 12:40 AM UTC
Great thread - I like it.
From a safety standpoint I would say - they'd be inside. But from a vision and 'ability' standpoint it make sense that they would open up and expose themselves at least some.
Imagine being in battle and only seeing 10 - 20 degrees of open field in front of you.
Plus, from the documentaries etc I have read and seen TC's had to have an air of inviincibility about them which would lead me to believe that they would go riding into battle exposed.
From a safety standpoint I would say - they'd be inside. But from a vision and 'ability' standpoint it make sense that they would open up and expose themselves at least some.
Imagine being in battle and only seeing 10 - 20 degrees of open field in front of you.
Plus, from the documentaries etc I have read and seen TC's had to have an air of inviincibility about them which would lead me to believe that they would go riding into battle exposed.
mikeli125
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 12:47 AM UTC
i'd agree with that po some points slodder assitting in the tank mught give the other crew members and others a negitive image and give the impression that they were a bit if a coward which might in turn work it's way through the tank and unit by not taking risks ect
c6o
New York, United States
Joined: January 18, 2004
KitMaker: 64 posts
Armorama: 61 posts
Joined: January 18, 2004
KitMaker: 64 posts
Armorama: 61 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 03:48 AM UTC
a good book to read and it does answer a lot of questions is "panzer aces" by franz kurowski and translated by david johnson.
cheers-carpe diem
cheers-carpe diem
barron
Virginia, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 04:22 AM UTC
when I was a tc on an m1a1 I liked to keep my hatch in the open protective position, meaning that it was locked in the half open position. It gave you overhead cover but still allowed you excellent vision. Being fully buttoned up robbed you of alot of vision.
blaster76
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 25, 2004 - 05:02 AM UTC
Based on the way I did it, I would venture to say they rode around standing up in the coupola, when the action started, they would drop down and pop up as needed but generally the hatch would be open. Button up time came probably when the bullets started whizzing fast and furious
IDHUNTER
Idaho, United States
Joined: December 09, 2003
KitMaker: 87 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: December 09, 2003
KitMaker: 87 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 - 07:39 AM UTC
Another quote from Otto Carius..."The lack of good observation by the Russians often resulted in the defeat of large units. TC's who slam their hatches shut at the beginning of an attack & don't open them again until the objective has been reached are useless, or at least second rate. No one can deny that the many casualties among the officers & other TC's were due to expsoing their heads. But these men did not die in vain. If they had moved with closed hatches, then many more would have found their deaths or been severly wounded."