So Dragon has reworked their old Tiger kits #6253 and #6252 and you guess what? Dragon is joking us.
No clear parts for periscopes
No aluminium barrel
crappy DS tracks
No PE for star antenna
No PE for sideskirts
etc.
All for 70€! I'll NEVER buy a Dragon kit again...
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Beware of Dragons "new" #6253
ChrisK89
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 05:37 PM UTC
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 05:50 PM UTC
If you think that's bad, you see the dolls they just released. At least these Tigers don't look exactly like pre-pubescent children's toys.
ChrisK89
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 05:59 PM UTC
I don't care for Dragons other products but what really pisses me off is that they have clear parts for all new Tigers they released (Tunisian/Initial etc.) but NOT for the standard one? What the heck! is wrong with this company...
Oblivion
Dodecanese, Greece / Ελλάδα
Joined: April 04, 2015
KitMaker: 195 posts
Armorama: 191 posts
Joined: April 04, 2015
KitMaker: 195 posts
Armorama: 191 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 06:24 PM UTC
There was no point in releasing "nerfed" editions of the iconic 6252/6253, since you can get 6600 and 6406, which are effectively the same kits (6600 is an improved 6252 in terms of accuracy)
They just want to cash-in from the hype around 6252/6253. I was crawling the web for months using the keywords "Dragon 6252/3 - Tiger 6252/3 - DML 6252/3" to get the original releases.
I am sure that many of us are still searching for the original kits and many will get the new ones thinking they found what they were looking for...
They just want to cash-in from the hype around 6252/6253. I was crawling the web for months using the keywords "Dragon 6252/3 - Tiger 6252/3 - DML 6252/3" to get the original releases.
I am sure that many of us are still searching for the original kits and many will get the new ones thinking they found what they were looking for...
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 07:08 PM UTC
Quoted Text
There was no point in releasing "nerfed" editions of the iconic 6252/6253, since you can get 6600 and 6406, which are effectively the same kits (6600 is an improved 6252 in terms of accuracy)
They just want to cash-in from the hype around 6252/6253. I was crawling the web for months using the keywords "Dragon 6252/3 - Tiger 6252/3 - DML 6252/3" to get the original releases.
I am sure that many of us are still searching for the original kits and many will get the new ones thinking they found what they were looking for...
Get used to it!
ceerosvk
Slovakia
Joined: November 25, 2013
KitMaker: 171 posts
Armorama: 170 posts
Joined: November 25, 2013
KitMaker: 171 posts
Armorama: 170 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 07:13 PM UTC
what a joke. to be perfectly honest i have already lost all the respect (and i had a lot of it) for this company. Go for a Tiger kits from Italeri, plenty of Pe, great molding quality and less than half the price.
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 07:59 PM UTC
Dragon confuses me. It's like they cannot decide which marketing direction they want to go. Take the Tiger initial. The first release has all sorts of extras. Then they release a second Tiger initial with reworked molds, less extras, different boxing. This I can understand. Where they lost me is the apparently re-release the original Tiger Initial without the extras. Why did they go back? Or is it the second, reworked boxing in the first box? Their Early Tiger strategy was weird too. A limited release followed by years totally without an Early. Then the strange Cyberhobby Orange box version, which had an odd mix of decent tiger parts and crap (the road wheels and lower hull come to mind). Finally they are releasing multiple earlies.
How about their Nashorns? They botch the first attempts at a Hornisse and a Nashorn. Later they release a second version with some corrections- makes sense. Then The premium version adds a bunch of extras, which I can still follow. Then they release a Nashorn "Initial/Initial Modified/Early" (Isn't that technically a Hornisse?). This is the smart kit version with lots of new parts- you'd think the pinnacle of Nashorns. Their next step? They plan to re-release the original reworked Nashorn and Hornisse. I just don't understand why they improve their products and then go back to the originals
How about their Nashorns? They botch the first attempts at a Hornisse and a Nashorn. Later they release a second version with some corrections- makes sense. Then The premium version adds a bunch of extras, which I can still follow. Then they release a Nashorn "Initial/Initial Modified/Early" (Isn't that technically a Hornisse?). This is the smart kit version with lots of new parts- you'd think the pinnacle of Nashorns. Their next step? They plan to re-release the original reworked Nashorn and Hornisse. I just don't understand why they improve their products and then go back to the originals
ChrisK89
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 08:33 PM UTC
At first i was really disappointed after opening the box.. then i was angry.
David Byrden you are "Dragon's Tiger Expert"... pls explain to me why the [auto-censored] they canceled the clear parts? On EVERY! other Tiger Kit they are provided but why not on this one?
David Byrden you are "Dragon's Tiger Expert"... pls explain to me why the [auto-censored] they canceled the clear parts? On EVERY! other Tiger Kit they are provided but why not on this one?
easyco69
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 08:34 PM UTC
6253 was released in 2005
Instruction manual
http://www.dragon-models.com/instruction/6253Instruction.PDF
6252 was also released in 2005
Instruction Manual
http://www.dragon-models.com/instruction/6252Instruction.PDF
If these are re-released without those parts then yes..they are cheap. But, flip through the url's & see the parts for 2005 release's.
The second one comes with a camera man!! Did you get the camera man?????
I also noticed Dragon has been skimping, that's why its very important to research the kit before hand. That new T-34/85 German version is just plain basic kit as well.
Instruction manual
http://www.dragon-models.com/instruction/6253Instruction.PDF
6252 was also released in 2005
Instruction Manual
http://www.dragon-models.com/instruction/6252Instruction.PDF
If these are re-released without those parts then yes..they are cheap. But, flip through the url's & see the parts for 2005 release's.
The second one comes with a camera man!! Did you get the camera man?????
I also noticed Dragon has been skimping, that's why its very important to research the kit before hand. That new T-34/85 German version is just plain basic kit as well.
edmund
United States
Joined: November 10, 2014
KitMaker: 668 posts
Armorama: 456 posts
Joined: November 10, 2014
KitMaker: 668 posts
Armorama: 456 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 08:35 PM UTC
So now Dragon is a love it or leave it proposition . And you better be ready to pay to love it ? Are there any periscopes at all ?
easyco69
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 08:42 PM UTC
Quoted Text
So now Dragon is a love it or leave it proposition . And you better be ready to pay to love it ? Are there any periscopes at all ?
If theres parts missing , someone probably stole all the parts & resealed the kit lol!!
ChrisK89
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 08:54 PM UTC
This is what you get in this rerelease:
"periscopes"... (total joke in year 2015 where every other tiger release has clear parts)
btw... there is no clear part for the drivers visor either so we have a big ugly hole there or build it shut
marking options are limited to a minimum too
(the cut out decals are the unit markings for s.Pz.Abt.101, does anyone of you have 2 of them in stash?)
and at last the new and better star antenna
"periscopes"... (total joke in year 2015 where every other tiger release has clear parts)
btw... there is no clear part for the drivers visor either so we have a big ugly hole there or build it shut
marking options are limited to a minimum too
(the cut out decals are the unit markings for s.Pz.Abt.101, does anyone of you have 2 of them in stash?)
and at last the new and better star antenna
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 09:18 PM UTC
Whoever can get that antenna fully cleaned up without it breaking in more that 5 places is a true modelling God.
Byrden
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 09:51 PM UTC
Quoted Text
pls explain to me why the [auto-censored] they canceled the clear parts? On EVERY! other Tiger Kit they are provided but why not on this one?
I don't know. I was not involved in the re-release of these kits, except that I answered a few questions about differences between 6600 and 6252.
David
kjoy
North Dakota, United States
Joined: September 11, 2005
KitMaker: 63 posts
Armorama: 57 posts
Joined: September 11, 2005
KitMaker: 63 posts
Armorama: 57 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 09:54 PM UTC
I purchased three Panther G's w/ zimmerit the other day. Each was missing a different part. One was missing the copula, one the clear periscopes and all three were missing the DS dented storage boxes. They suck.
Cuny12
Australia
Joined: April 04, 2010
KitMaker: 378 posts
Armorama: 348 posts
Joined: April 04, 2010
KitMaker: 378 posts
Armorama: 348 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 10:30 PM UTC
The price of this kit on Hobbyeasy is rediculous 114.00 AU is a bit steep and obviously not worth it.
They have done the same with the new M1 kit by skimping the straps for the jerry cans on the bustle they aren't the leader any more in my opinion they just own the market when it comes to German Armor and that's all they are good for.
They have done the same with the new M1 kit by skimping the straps for the jerry cans on the bustle they aren't the leader any more in my opinion they just own the market when it comes to German Armor and that's all they are good for.
edmund
United States
Joined: November 10, 2014
KitMaker: 668 posts
Armorama: 456 posts
Joined: November 10, 2014
KitMaker: 668 posts
Armorama: 456 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 11:41 PM UTC
Well it's going to boil down to if you don't like it don't buy it . Hopefully other company's will step in and fill the void . They already are forcing the DS tracks on you even if you don't want them !
kjoy
North Dakota, United States
Joined: September 11, 2005
KitMaker: 63 posts
Armorama: 57 posts
Joined: September 11, 2005
KitMaker: 63 posts
Armorama: 57 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 04, 2015 - 11:43 PM UTC
Yeah I'm done with them...I have enough in the stash. I'll go else where
Skar1975
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: October 05, 2015
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Joined: October 05, 2015
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Posted: Monday, October 05, 2015 - 12:41 AM UTC
I actually made an account here to pretty much write the same warning...
Still stunned...going to return them...first time ever this is going to happen as I usually build even the crappiest models but this time really feel taken advantage of.
Still stunned...going to return them...first time ever this is going to happen as I usually build even the crappiest models but this time really feel taken advantage of.
panzer_fan
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 25, 2003
KitMaker: 427 posts
Armorama: 348 posts
Joined: March 25, 2003
KitMaker: 427 posts
Armorama: 348 posts
Posted: Monday, October 05, 2015 - 01:06 AM UTC
I will throw this in the thread:
While on it, dear Dragon, revise the impossible to follow instructions too. It should not be that hard to make them more user friendly.
While on it, dear Dragon, revise the impossible to follow instructions too. It should not be that hard to make them more user friendly.
Tojo72
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Joined: June 06, 2006
KitMaker: 4,691 posts
Armorama: 3,509 posts
Posted: Monday, October 05, 2015 - 01:25 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I actually made an account here to pretty much write the same warning...
Still stunned...going to return them...first time ever this is going to happen as I usually build even the crappiest models but this time really feel taken advantage of.
Wouldn't you read what was in the contents of a kit before ordereing it blindly and then complaining about it,I know Dragonusaonline usually lists what a kit has or hasn't.It's good to wait for a "whats in the box review" before plunking down big bucks.Did they mislead you as to the contents of the kit you want to return ?
I don't know,just askin ?