Quoted Text
Quoted Text
The Centurion bunkers are from the 1990s. And Switzerland has a number of geographic features that make fortifications quite effective for a certain part of the country (Schweizer Reduit).
As with the Maginot (that was circumvented, not broken) but without the monetary and political problems of the Maginot(1), the swiss system is NOT a "thou shall not pass" system or "Chinese wall" but rather a "It will be VERY COSTLY to pass" system.
Short of using nuclear weapons the swiss bunkers, often dug INTO the mountains, are hard to kill and quite effective given the rugged and even for tanks often un-passable terrain.
(1) The french actually had plans to link the Maginots (that would have blocked the Ardennes) AND to extend it to the sea (That would have blocked the route through Belgium). But money was sheduled for post 1940...
This reminds me of all the hype the tora bora tunnels got during the Afgan war... The russians were stopped.. yes. The US with guided 2000 lb bombs and Fuel Air ordnance walked right through. Fixed defenses may slow a modern attacking army slightly but not more than the time it takes to get a laser guided bomb off the rails and to the ground.
As a note the Maginot line was broken in a few places by German attacks during the campaign. Yes over all it held but it also did not face the main attack. Fixed defense is a thing of the past.
a) The Swiss fortification we are talking about are designed for fighting Cold War USSR/WP forces. And the force attacking them most likely would NOT be the prime forces (Those would attack NATO)
b) Switzerland has an air force and air defence, including stuff like Radar. Something the Taliban where a bit lacking. SAM and AA really tend to reduce the flyboys accuracy.
c) If designating from the ground: That bunker is NOT alone and NOT the first line of defence. Among others it is backed by long ranged artillery in the rear and infantry in front of it. And that region is not exactly "parachute country" nor infiltrator friendly
