_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Modern - USA
Modern Armor, AFVs, and Support vehicles.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Meng Model 1:35 - US M2a3 Bradley w/ Busk III
PaulBrickles
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: April 14, 2015
KitMaker: 188 posts
Armorama: 173 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 - 04:22 PM UTC
Creative models have dropped the price of the Meng Model 1:35 - US M2a3 Bradley w/ Busk III IFV.

http://www.creativemodels.co.uk/meng_model_135_us_m2a3_bradley_w_busk_iii_ifv_full_interior-p-34620.html
Cantstopbuyingkits
Visit this Community
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 - 06:47 PM UTC
It's not just the Bradley. They've drop the price for about 100 items in total (mainly Revell) this week.
SpaceXhydro
Visit this Community
England - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: March 13, 2015
KitMaker: 418 posts
Armorama: 235 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 12, 2015 - 03:09 AM UTC
If i wasn't occupied with many other things and projects i would take the chance and buy the discounted M2a3 Bradley. You can also get get it cheaply from amazon too.
ScratchShipBuilder
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 29, 2015
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Posted: Friday, November 13, 2015 - 08:39 PM UTC
And now this thread put me in the poor house. I ordered a Meng M3A3 and interior, and a Meng M2a2. Gee thanks guys.
skyshark
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: November 16, 2005
KitMaker: 703 posts
Armorama: 499 posts
Posted: Friday, November 13, 2015 - 10:50 PM UTC
Meng did a M2A2
ScratchShipBuilder
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 29, 2015
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 14, 2015 - 01:32 AM UTC
Typo. M2A3
ScratchShipBuilder
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 29, 2015
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 - 09:17 PM UTC
Oh no, I got my M2A3 and whil unpackaging sprues, I think I dropped a pair of track links. Anyone know if the kit has more than needed? I'd hate to have this expensive kit not be able to be built.
HeavyArty
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 - 09:26 PM UTC
There are more links than needed. Also, you only need to build the lower run and angled parts over the sprocket and return roller. The top run is not seen and doesn't need to be there. That is how I built the tracks on the Orochi M3A3 (almost the same tracks) and have about half the links still left over for another build.
ScratchShipBuilder
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 29, 2015
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 - 09:45 PM UTC
Thanks Gino. It looks like a phenomenal kit. I test fit a couple links and I think I like how the tracks are engineered I can't wait for their Abrams. It's going to be fat times for modelers when we're old men.
Cantstopbuyingkits
Visit this Community
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 - 10:37 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Oh no, I got my M2A3 and whil unpackaging sprues, I think I dropped a pair of track links. Anyone know if the kit has more than needed? I'd hate to have this expensive kit not be able to be built.



Couldn't you just pick them up?
falco
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: April 12, 2003
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 33 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 - 10:57 PM UTC
I also have that kit which IS superb.

A contributor on MODELLING MADNESS mentioned that there are a few things missing or incorrect such as wrong radio,
+ some missing 'electronic' parts, as usual no proof of these errors is provided!, although photos of the interior of a combat vehicle are somewhat rare.
bill_c
Staff MemberCampaigns Administrator
MODEL SHIPWRIGHTS
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 - 11:15 PM UTC

Quoted Text

It looks like a phenomenal kit.


It is SUPERB. One of the best kits around IMO.


Quoted Text

A contributor on MODELLING MADNESS mentioned that there are a few things missing or incorrect such as wrong radio, + some missing 'electronic' parts, as usual no proof of these errors is provided!, although photos of the interior of a combat vehicle are somewhat rare.


Robert Skipper has some excellent photos you can purchase from him. I used a set building mine. Don't sweat the radio, it can't be seen unless you take off the turret roof.
HeavyArty
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 - 12:08 AM UTC
Not sure what "electronic part" he is talking about. The radios are incorrect though. The kit has the old VRC-160, Series-46/12 radios, which haven't been used since the mid-90s.


The correct radios are SINCGARS which can be had from Pro Art Models. You can just see the screen of the SINCGARS ASIP radio behind the TC below.



Bottom line, no kit is perfect. The Meng Bradleys are very close to it though.
Epi
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 - 02:57 AM UTC
Missing electronics could mean the VIC/intercom system, other than that, MENG did the best damn job they could along with Rob's references.

ScratchShipBuilder
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 29, 2015
KitMaker: 22 posts
Armorama: 21 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 - 03:47 AM UTC
Dang Pete. Those scratch built details are your thing.
18Bravo
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 - 04:27 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Missing electronics could mean the VIC/intercom system, other than that, MENG did the best damn job they could along with Rob's references.




Well Pete, over on the "Varsity" site there's speculation as to how they'll do on the Abrams. Using your logic, I'd say odds are it's going to be a pretty good kit.
And could the ABV be in our future?
 _GOTOTOP