My Strv103 is nearly finished. I was thinking of painting it in a winter camoufalge. Which of the 4 standard colors (light green, dark green, tan or black) should be replaced / overpainted bij white ?
Thanks in advance,
Marc
Hosted by Darren Baker
Another Strv 103 C Question
MMB
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: September 16, 2003
KitMaker: 259 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: September 16, 2003
KitMaker: 259 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 - 07:58 PM UTC
clausen
Fyn, Denmark
Joined: May 03, 2003
KitMaker: 449 posts
Armorama: 212 posts
Joined: May 03, 2003
KitMaker: 449 posts
Armorama: 212 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 - 09:01 PM UTC
I would like to know that too!!! - And is the anyone who have any references and/or photos of finished models, of the Strv 103C this camo-scheme???
Best regards,
Bjoern
Best regards,
Bjoern
MMB
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: September 16, 2003
KitMaker: 259 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: September 16, 2003
KitMaker: 259 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 - 10:38 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I would like to know that too!!! - And is the anyone who have any references and/or photos of finished models, of the Strv 103C this camo-scheme???
Best regards,
Bjoern
I do have some pictures but I can't quite figure out which color was replaced by white. The pictures are not clear to me and the camuflage sceme is different tha the one I have.
Marc
Uruk-Hai
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 - 11:31 PM UTC
The 4-tone splintercamoflage consist of light green, dark green, black and khaki.
Khaki and light green is overpainted with white paint for wintercamo.
The paint used is a waterbased chalk very similar to the german type used during WWII and is therefore easily worn of and hard to get an full and even coverage.
Khaki and light green is overpainted with white paint for wintercamo.
The paint used is a waterbased chalk very similar to the german type used during WWII and is therefore easily worn of and hard to get an full and even coverage.
clausen
Fyn, Denmark
Joined: May 03, 2003
KitMaker: 449 posts
Armorama: 212 posts
Joined: May 03, 2003
KitMaker: 449 posts
Armorama: 212 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 01:00 AM UTC
I tried to use photoshop to illustrate how it would look if you cover the light green and khaki colours with white wash!
Is this how it should look?
Bjoern
Is this how it should look?
Bjoern
MMB
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: September 16, 2003
KitMaker: 259 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: September 16, 2003
KitMaker: 259 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 04:12 AM UTC
WOW, that's a great tool to test different camouflage patterns on your models !!
Thanks !
Thanks !
Uruk-Hai
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 11:07 AM UTC
Hilsen Clausen!
The chipping looks ok but the whitewash of wintercamo is more transparent so that usually the colours underneath shows through.
Take a lokk at Plastic Warfare for usefull information and inspiration:
http://www.plasticwarfare.com/
Heres one example from the gallery. Anders Isakssons Str 122.
Ha de dejligt!
The chipping looks ok but the whitewash of wintercamo is more transparent so that usually the colours underneath shows through.
Take a lokk at Plastic Warfare for usefull information and inspiration:
http://www.plasticwarfare.com/
Heres one example from the gallery. Anders Isakssons Str 122.
Ha de dejligt!
Dixon66
New Hampshire, United States
Joined: December 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,500 posts
Armorama: 289 posts
Joined: December 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,500 posts
Armorama: 289 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 03:54 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The chipping looks ok but the whitewash of wintercamo is more transparent so that usually the colours underneath shows through.
TOKE,
If I read this correctly, then the best way would be to paint all four colors, then over paint the light green and brown with a thin white wash. OK, makes sense, since that is the way it was done anyway.
Also, I have read in posts on ML and TL that the fuel cans on the sides are painted in dark green only. Do you know if this is really the case? Same thing about early C's being in overall dark green only as well?
Dave
Uruk-Hai
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 09:42 PM UTC
Whitewash or stipple/drybrush should do the trick. And I agree that first painting the 4-tone splinter would be a good idea. At least its easier to see the proportion.
Ive stipled this wintercamo on this 1/76 103C with Humbrol 34 + 28 some years ago
Im not a true expert on the 103C but Ive seen early vehicles painted allover in the greygreen colour originating from the fifties. Ive also seen vehicles all over in the 4-tone splinter camoflage except for the bottom and the wheels and sides behind the wheels.
Ive never seen the splintercamoflage with the fueltanks on the side in a solid colour. But I dont know if that was a possibility. Ive seen the storage canisters on the aft in different colours and different style though as these were often crashed and replaced.
Ive stipled this wintercamo on this 1/76 103C with Humbrol 34 + 28 some years ago
Im not a true expert on the 103C but Ive seen early vehicles painted allover in the greygreen colour originating from the fifties. Ive also seen vehicles all over in the 4-tone splinter camoflage except for the bottom and the wheels and sides behind the wheels.
Ive never seen the splintercamoflage with the fueltanks on the side in a solid colour. But I dont know if that was a possibility. Ive seen the storage canisters on the aft in different colours and different style though as these were often crashed and replaced.
Uruk-Hai
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Joined: January 31, 2003
KitMaker: 795 posts
Armorama: 472 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 09:44 PM UTC
Ooops heres the pic:
And heres the link:
http://www.ipmsstockholm.org/magazine/1997/11/stuff_nilsson_lost.htm
And heres the link:
http://www.ipmsstockholm.org/magazine/1997/11/stuff_nilsson_lost.htm
AikinutNY
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Joined: October 21, 2003
KitMaker: 683 posts
Armorama: 630 posts
Posted: Friday, January 30, 2004 - 01:51 AM UTC
I fell in love with the S-tank the first ime I saw one many years ago. Sadly, they are out of service now. What improvement would be needed to have a 103"D". Upgrade the gun to a 120mm German? Reactive armor or Chobum armor? Are there any after market PE kits for the S-tank? And Finally how good is the Trumpeter kit?
Dixon66
New Hampshire, United States
Joined: December 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,500 posts
Armorama: 289 posts
Joined: December 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,500 posts
Armorama: 289 posts
Posted: Friday, January 30, 2004 - 06:54 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Are there any after market PE kits for the S-tank? And Finally how good is the Trumpeter kit?
AikinutNY,
Eduard has three or four different PE sets for the S-tank. I have the one w/ the "RPG Fence" and the wading pole retainers, etc. only. The Trumpeter kit goes together very well. It is a little small to scale probably closer to 1/38. I like it enough that I bought the b and the C versions. Built the B out of the box. Starting the C as soon as I have time LOL.
Dave S.