_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Metal Tracks?
eyeball
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: July 03, 2003
KitMaker: 23 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 05:30 AM UTC
Hi All,
I haven't been here in quite a while but I am finally back. I have a few questions regarding the metal tracks I have heard so much about. I am building a Tamiya brand PzKpfw IV Ausf. D and I would like to use the real metal tracks as opposed to the vinyl stuff that came with the kit. My questions are:

1) In your opinion what is the best brand of track to buy
2) Are the tracks generic or are they sold for each particular vehicle?
3) Any tips on how to paint,weather....etc?

Thanks in advance; look forward to your input.

-Eyeball
Monte
Visit this Community
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: December 08, 2002
KitMaker: 833 posts
Armorama: 601 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 06:35 AM UTC
I've used both Fruil metal and Modelcasten plastic tracks and they both work well. The Modelcasten take a bit more construction but they both look nice. If it's metal you want then go with the Fruil.

They are specific to the vehicle, no "one size fits all" so make sure you get the ones intended for that tank. Once assembled you just paint them like you would the band type that come with the kit.
WeWillHold
Visit this Community
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 06:45 AM UTC
Monty is right here eyeball.

Friuls for me are the way to go. They are robust, not to bad to assemble and provide that wonderful "sag" that looks so good on the appropriate vehicle. In addition, Blacken it will weather them beautifully, or if you wish, they take paint pretty well.

Good luck on whatever you decide.

Steve
keenan
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 06:50 AM UTC
Iball,
There is a link below to Hometown Hobbies. I posted it so you could see actual pictures of the different Fruil track sets that are available. Check the link called "Learn How to Build Them" on that page too. It is a pretty good primer but be aware that the tracks come with the hole through them now and you won't have to drill them out. (The ones I have have the hole in them already anyway...) They come with wire too, so you won't have to make the pins.

I love 'em.

Shaun

http://www.hometown-hobbies.com/friulmodel_track_sets
eyeball
Visit this Community
Alabama, United States
Joined: July 03, 2003
KitMaker: 23 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 06:59 AM UTC
Thanks guys!!! As always a big help
tazz
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: July 21, 2002
KitMaker: 1,462 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 07:34 AM UTC
dam home town has some good fruil tracks,
iam going to get some for my tiger 1 and elefant
thebear
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: November 15, 2002
KitMaker: 3,960 posts
Armorama: 3,579 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 08:35 AM UTC
Hi Eyeball remember for the panzer IV D you need the 36 cm tracks and along with this you had better get the sprocket for the Early IV's other wise the tracks won't fit ...Tamiya did a bit of cheating on this old kit and used its PzrIV H kit as a base...I think the idler will work but if you have a new Hummel kit you can use there idlers (they have both the old and later ones in the kit ) Might be hard to get it to work but is much nicer than the old tamiya piece..Have fun with you project!!

Rick
TreadHead
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 12, 2002
KitMaker: 5,000 posts
Armorama: 2,868 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 08:48 AM UTC
Howdy Monte,

Being a big Fruil fan, I will have to say they are the best! MK's are good as well, but cost as much, and take more work IMHO. Plus you have the added 'look' of proper sag (especially on german steel).
As has already been said, they are model specific.
And, as for painting them. I'm a subscriber of Chris Mrosko's method of chemical 'aging', and then adding paint to suit.
hth.

Tread.
Monte
Visit this Community
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: December 08, 2002
KitMaker: 833 posts
Armorama: 601 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 09:16 AM UTC
Thanks Tread. Iagree with you, since I used the Fruils for my Ferdinand I've been hooked. The MK's are nice but concidering what you get with the finished product I can justify the extra cost of the Fruil's.

My next project is a Sturmtiger and it will be wearing a set of Fruils.
TreadHead
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 12, 2002
KitMaker: 5,000 posts
Armorama: 2,868 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 09:22 AM UTC



:-) :-) :-) Just glad to have another 'convert'!


Tread.
deadman
Visit this Community
Istanbul, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: May 12, 2002
KitMaker: 90 posts
Armorama: 85 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 09:28 AM UTC
i have just realized our common mistake

not fruil

but friulmodel

thanks,
Orkun
Monte
Visit this Community
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: December 08, 2002
KitMaker: 833 posts
Armorama: 601 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 10:45 AM UTC
Was aware that it is Fruilmodel. Just calling them Fruil for short
TreadHead
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 12, 2002
KitMaker: 5,000 posts
Armorama: 2,868 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 11:31 AM UTC



................Fruilmodelissimo........that is right isn't it? Anybody have a box in front of them?

Tread.
deadman
Visit this Community
Istanbul, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: May 12, 2002
KitMaker: 90 posts
Armorama: 85 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 12:54 PM UTC
no no still wrong )
i was doing same mistake til i saw the box of the track set

f-r-i-u-l model just swicht the i and u

but they are great track sets ..

check the box art

Monte
Visit this Community
Rhode Island, United States
Joined: December 08, 2002
KitMaker: 833 posts
Armorama: 601 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 12:56 PM UTC
What ever the spelling may be I think that we can all agree that they are a great set of tracks!
yorkie
Visit this Community
Hong Kong S.A.R. / 繁體
Joined: July 11, 2003
KitMaker: 101 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 09:58 PM UTC

Quoted Text

What ever the spelling may be I think that we can all agree that they are a great set of tracks!



Yes, they are. I like them bery much. MK is too much trouble to assemble. But the FV Club offerings are quite good also, and they're cheap.

Sometimes I don't use the wire comes with the F-r-i-u-l. I use 0.3 or 0.4mm steel wire for extra strength. And I don't use CA glue, I put a small quantity of Epoxy putty to seal those little holes.
Plasticbattle
#003
Visit this Community
Donegal, Ireland
Joined: May 14, 2002
KitMaker: 9,763 posts
Armorama: 7,444 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 11:26 PM UTC
Im more of a OOB builder, but I have used Friul tracks for an Italeri Panther D as Italeri´s bite the big one. Possibly the finest item in modelling that is. Im sorry my panther isnt up to scratch. Definately go for the friul. You´ll be sold first time. Their own weight adds so much to the finished vehicle and the sag is 100% natural.
For pinning them I use staples. Straighten the "legs" and then you have all wires pre cut to the same length. The big advantage of this is you know they are all pushed in the whole way. Make up in lengths of 10, cut of the excess staple and super glue. Leave a few unglued so you can shorten if needed. A thin pin vise is extremely useful as there may be some flash inside the pin holes. I prime with a hobby primer and paint as normal after that. Another big advantage with friuls is you dont have the last link problem... The only downside to friuls is the price ... more than the panzer D probably!
Good luck.

DutchBird
#068
Visit this Community
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: April 09, 2003
KitMaker: 1,144 posts
Armorama: 526 posts
Posted: Friday, January 30, 2004 - 12:50 AM UTC
I am not going by experience here, but by hearsay:

I have read that some modellers use Friul-tracks or MK-tracks depending on the vehicle. And that generally MK-tracks look better on smaller vehicles (like the Hotchkiss, smaller Sd.Kfz's, Pz I), while Friul-tracks look better on the bigger vehicles (like Famo, Tiger I, Pz IV).

They argue that on smaller vehicles the Friul's look a bit out of scale, while on the bigger vehicles the look better, mostly indeed because of the natural sag. And that for them the switch is made with the Pz II / Pz III.

All I know for myself is that the Marder I kit has MK-tracks, I have MK-tracks for my Wespe, and that for my to be built Sd.Kfz 7's I will use MK-tracks (and wheels).

Cheers,

Harm
 _GOTOTOP