Hi all,
I'm planning on building the Kubelwagen captured by 3 Squadron RAAF however it appears to have a piece of equipment attached I can't identify. It is the black item located below the windscreen in the attached photos. I can't see anything similar in pictures of other Kubelwagens. Could this be a field modification or an addition made after capture?
Scott.
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Identifying equipment on Kubelwagen
Dino84
Northern Territory, Australia
Joined: January 05, 2016
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Joined: January 05, 2016
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 - 01:04 PM UTC
Dannyd
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: March 27, 2007
KitMaker: 803 posts
Armorama: 793 posts
Joined: March 27, 2007
KitMaker: 803 posts
Armorama: 793 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 - 01:08 PM UTC
Hi Scott,
Looks like a horn to me fella that's been bodged on to the vehicle.
Dan
Looks like a horn to me fella that's been bodged on to the vehicle.
Dan
Jmarles
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 - 01:22 PM UTC
Maybe a mount for the gun?
Sean50
Manche, France
Joined: March 20, 2007
KitMaker: 340 posts
Armorama: 328 posts
Joined: March 20, 2007
KitMaker: 340 posts
Armorama: 328 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 - 01:29 PM UTC
Hello there
Dan is correct, it's a horn.
There's a whole load of changes to be made to any of the available kits if you want to make thus early car, by the way. For instance, this was the original location of the horn.
Cheers
Sean
Dan is correct, it's a horn.
There's a whole load of changes to be made to any of the available kits if you want to make thus early car, by the way. For instance, this was the original location of the horn.
Cheers
Sean
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 - 05:11 PM UTC
Quoted Text
There's a whole load of changes to be made to any of the available kits if you want to make thus early car, by the way.
Here are a few :
(from http://vw82.free.fr/index.php/typ82-chrono/ )
H.P.
Dino84
Northern Territory, Australia
Joined: January 05, 2016
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Joined: January 05, 2016
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 - 06:12 PM UTC
Thanks everyone, looks like I'm in for a fair bit of work!
Scott.
Scott.
Sean50
Manche, France
Joined: March 20, 2007
KitMaker: 340 posts
Armorama: 328 posts
Joined: March 20, 2007
KitMaker: 340 posts
Armorama: 328 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 - 10:30 PM UTC
I don't think all the changes H-P posted will be necessary. A couple of good references, particularly for early Kübelwagen are two Allied publications, both since reprinted.
The BIOS report on the Volkswagen and the US technical manual TM E9-803. The latter I think is available as a PDF for free but the image quality isn't the best. Maybe adequate for what you need though.
Which kit are you using as a base?
I would suggest either the Hasegawa/Bego or Tamiya DAK versions. The latter may be easier to find.
In brief, your main issues will be new exhausts, shortened rear mudguards, fill in holes for jacking points, relocate horn (and add extension as per photo) and shovel, fit trafficators onto the sides of the windshields.
I think that's about it.
Cheers,
Sean
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 - 01:56 AM UTC
Looking closer at the RAAF Kubelwagen pics, I guess it could be a 1940-1941 model...Check out the linked page to spot the details
H.P.
H.P.
samkidd
Alaska, United States
Joined: January 06, 2006
KitMaker: 530 posts
Armorama: 450 posts
Joined: January 06, 2006
KitMaker: 530 posts
Armorama: 450 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 07, 2016 - 02:55 PM UTC
Discussions exactly like this one is why I dearly love Armorama. Interesting and informative stuff like this really makes my day. Seriously, where else can anyone find amazing conversations and cool reference material like this? Thanks guys!
Jim
LSA
Jim
LSA
Vicious
Queensland, Australia
Joined: September 04, 2015
KitMaker: 1,517 posts
Armorama: 1,109 posts
Joined: September 04, 2015
KitMaker: 1,517 posts
Armorama: 1,109 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 07, 2016 - 03:28 PM UTC
i find really interesting the RAAF picture,on the picture you can see 2 tommy-gun,cal.30,one Lee Enfield but the other rifle?...short barrel,skinny long Bayonet and i think even a optics?...maybe a Italian Moschetto Carcano Mod.91?...
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 07, 2016 - 06:47 PM UTC
I don't know if that's an Italian rifle (good guess for sure) but there's no .30cal MG in the photo. It's a .50cal Browning HMG with an perforated barrel jacket (likely taken from an aircraft mount). The .30cal M1917A4 MG would be much smaller.
ziggyfoos
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 27, 2004
KitMaker: 199 posts
Armorama: 133 posts
Joined: June 27, 2004
KitMaker: 199 posts
Armorama: 133 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 07, 2016 - 07:05 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I don't know if that's an Italian rifle (good guess for sure) but there's no .30cal MG in the photo. It's a .50cal Browning HMG with an perforated barrel jacket (likely taken from an aircraft mount). The .30cal M1917A4 MG would be much smaller.
Barrel looks awfully small to me to be a 50cal. Were they different lengths?
ziggyfoos
North Carolina, United States
Joined: June 27, 2004
KitMaker: 199 posts
Armorama: 133 posts
Joined: June 27, 2004
KitMaker: 199 posts
Armorama: 133 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 07, 2016 - 07:11 PM UTC
"Small" I mean as in length of the barrel. Were aircraft 50s shorter in overall length than the air cooled M2?
Vicious
Queensland, Australia
Joined: September 04, 2015
KitMaker: 1,517 posts
Armorama: 1,109 posts
Joined: September 04, 2015
KitMaker: 1,517 posts
Armorama: 1,109 posts
Posted: Friday, January 08, 2016 - 02:37 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I don't know if that's an Italian rifle (good guess for sure) but there's no .30cal MG in the photo. It's a .50cal Browning HMG with an perforated barrel jacket (likely taken from an aircraft mount). The .30cal M1917A4 MG would be much smaller.
Now i watch in fact looks a cal.30 after a Hormons treatment!...
i am curious about the rifle becose i know some sniper (i am convinced to see a Optic on the rifle) like to customise is own gun and i see picture of Lee Enfield costomize look similar,but is unusual expecially for a desert warfare see a optics mounted on a short barrel rifle,i can understan in a jungle were you can approach the anemy a lot more...sorry for the off topic!
Dino84
Northern Territory, Australia
Joined: January 05, 2016
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Joined: January 05, 2016
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 10, 2016 - 09:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Which kit are you using as a base?
I would suggest either the Hasegawa/Bego or Tamiya DAK versions. The latter may be easier to find.
Sorry for the late reply, I'm using the Tamiya 1/48 DAK Kubelwagen as the base.
Quoted Text
Looking closer at the RAAF Kubelwagen pics, I guess it could be a 1940-1941 model...Check out the linked page to spot the details
H.P.
Looking at the pictures again I think you may be right, I can see a wiper cable in front of the windscreen which would put this into the 1940-41 category. I had thought that the rear fender was the earlier short version however this may have been an illusion from the shadows and the angle of the picture. At least this would save me from modifying the photo-etch windscreen, I've been scratching my head trying to figure that one out!
Scott.