Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
MiniArt: Tank Model of Tank Models?Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 10:47 PM UTC
MiniArt has something coming to market that is so good they have released a video to promote it.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
SSGToms
Connecticut, United States
Joined: April 02, 2005
KitMaker: 3,608 posts
Armorama: 3,092 posts
Joined: April 02, 2005
KitMaker: 3,608 posts
Armorama: 3,092 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 10:54 PM UTC
Oooooooooooooooooooo...............
pgb3476
Texas, United States
Joined: March 11, 2007
KitMaker: 977 posts
Armorama: 976 posts
Joined: March 11, 2007
KitMaker: 977 posts
Armorama: 976 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 10:55 PM UTC
Tease.....................
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 10:59 PM UTC
Wow - 55 seconds of my life I'll never get back. I just wish today's companies would cut the BS and tell us what their new kit is!
Wake me up when they mention the name...
Wake me up when they mention the name...
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:08 PM UTC
Really a waste of time. I wouldn't have even posted it if I were an editor. It shows nothing, no hints, no clues, no blurry images, nothing at all.
Zvierboi
Utah, United States
Joined: December 20, 2003
KitMaker: 56 posts
Armorama: 56 posts
Joined: December 20, 2003
KitMaker: 56 posts
Armorama: 56 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:14 PM UTC
Despite all the warnings....I watched it (nothing) anyways.
Paulinsibculo
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: July 01, 2010
KitMaker: 1,322 posts
Armorama: 1,239 posts
Joined: July 01, 2010
KitMaker: 1,322 posts
Armorama: 1,239 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:28 PM UTC
?????
What a remarkable way to announce
N O T H I N G
What a remarkable way to announce
N O T H I N G
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:37 PM UTC
So let me get this straight; it is ok for Takom to do this, but not anyone else?
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:37 PM UTC
Well... I know, I know! Is the model a bunch of crumbling letters? No? Oh well... Frankly (opinionated part here) I'd prefer that companies (all) just come out and announce the darn kit by name or at least give us a good idea of the upcoming kit instead of having these stupid obscure advertisements that tell us absolutely nothing and force us to simply guess what it is without any hint of, well, a hint. It's like trying to navigate along a steep cliff, in absolute darkness without any source of light. Here I thought there was going to be some sort of a picture that we could base our guesses off of... All we get are stupid crumbling letters. I don't know... These companies aren't resonating with me frankly. Give us something, give us substance. We (in my opinion) feed off of substance and having a reasonable idea of what's ahead.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:41 PM UTC
Quoted Text
So let me get this straight; it is ok for Takom to do this, but not anyone else?
I didn't see Takom's "announcement" but I would have given the same response if it is the same type.
These type of "announcements" are a waste of time.
DaelSumner
New York, United States
Joined: January 14, 2016
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Joined: January 14, 2016
KitMaker: 1 posts
Armorama: 1 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:43 PM UTC
This will make me tend to ignore whatever it is instead of anticipate it.
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:44 PM UTC
Alright, but what will the model be? There are stating it is something never released in plastic before, hmmmmmmm? I will go with my standard answer, a Ram II.
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:46 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Alright, but what will the model be? There are stating it is something never released in plastic before, hmmmmmmm? I will go with my standard answer, a Ram II.
I think it'll be gyrating fluegpanzsprechtslöausfbüld.
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:49 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextAlright, but what will the model be? There are stating it is something never released in plastic before, hmmmmmmm? I will go with my standard answer, a Ram II.
I think it'll be gyrating fluegpanzboblibub.
That is productive and mature. But thanks for the reply.
MikeyBugs95
New York, United States
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Joined: May 27, 2013
KitMaker: 2,210 posts
Armorama: 1,712 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 11:50 PM UTC
Hey, a ridiculous answer for a ridiculous advertisement. Can't be serious all the time. But if you want a serious answer, maybe it'll be a Matilda Mk. I. Miniart has done British tanks before and as far as I know, there has not been a Mk. I Matilda in plastic. Resin yes, plastic (as far as I know) no... So there, my ridiculous and my serious, productive, mature answer.
EDIT: Wait wasn't there that Eastern European kit of a Matilda? I'm not sure if that was a Valentine or a Matilda Mk I.
EDIT: Wait wasn't there that Eastern European kit of a Matilda? I'm not sure if that was a Valentine or a Matilda Mk I.
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 12:05 AM UTC
I'd be happy with a Canadian Ram or Australian Sentinel, however I do feel this advert is not that good and just gets peoples backs up.
Wolfhead
Minnesota, United States
Joined: August 16, 2005
KitMaker: 53 posts
Armorama: 52 posts
Joined: August 16, 2005
KitMaker: 53 posts
Armorama: 52 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 12:11 AM UTC
Most likely a Tiger... whee! :/
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 12:12 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Australian Sentinel
Now that would be exciting, I think I would buy one.
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 12:15 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextAustralian Sentinel
Now that would be exciting, I think I would buy one.
I'd buy a lot more than one.
crowley74
Hungary
Joined: January 14, 2016
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Joined: January 14, 2016
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 12:24 AM UTC
Removed by original poster on 01/14/16 - 20:00:15 (GMT).
maartenboersma
Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: October 10, 2010
KitMaker: 764 posts
Armorama: 742 posts
Joined: October 10, 2010
KitMaker: 764 posts
Armorama: 742 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 01:00 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Hey, a ridiculous answer for a ridiculous advertisement. Can't be serious all the time. But if you want a serious answer, maybe it'll be a Matilda Mk. I. Miniart has done British tanks before and as far as I know, there has not been a Mk. I Matilda in plastic. Resin yes, plastic (as far as I know) no... So there, my ridiculous and my serious, productive, mature answer.
EDIT: Wait wasn't there that Eastern European kit of a Matilda? I'm not sure if that was a Valentine or a Matilda Mk I.
I rather have a gyrating fluegpanzsprechtslöausfbüld
the camouflage patterns are way cool !
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 01:03 AM UTC
Tamiya has done it already, says something never released i plastic before.
TankManNick
California, United States
Joined: February 01, 2010
KitMaker: 551 posts
Armorama: 543 posts
Joined: February 01, 2010
KitMaker: 551 posts
Armorama: 543 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 01:44 AM UTC
Ah the clue here is 'workable torsion bars' which rules out SU-122 and Matilda I'm afraid.
Posted: Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 01:47 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Ah the clue here is 'workable torsion bars' which rules out SU-122 and Matilda I'm afraid.
Tamiya already does a Matilda.