Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Chinese K-63
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Monday, February 08, 2016 - 11:07 PM UTC
I saw that Bronco has a K-63, or rather several versions out. I thought of doing a PAVN version or Chinese version, but could use for information.
jasegreene
Florida, United States
Joined: October 21, 2013
KitMaker: 751 posts
Armorama: 751 posts
Joined: October 21, 2013
KitMaker: 751 posts
Armorama: 751 posts
Posted: Monday, February 08, 2016 - 11:47 PM UTC
They are very great kits,but with the tiny parts and photoetch it is not for beginners.I do believe there are some more in depth reviews in the review section.
seanmcandrews
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 09, 2009
KitMaker: 561 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Joined: May 09, 2009
KitMaker: 561 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Posted: Monday, February 08, 2016 - 11:49 PM UTC
What information exactly ? Markings, user modifications ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63_(armoured_personnel_carrier)
Sean
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63_(armoured_personnel_carrier)
Sean
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 04:17 AM UTC
Quoted Text
What information exactly ? Markings, user modifications ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63_(armoured_personnel_carrier)
Sean
Um yes. And yes I tried Wikipedia already.
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 05:14 PM UTC
Interesting variant...
H.P.
H.P.
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 11:06 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Interesting variant...
H.P.
I immediately thought of the Imperial Japanese Type 2 Ka-mi tank, though it probably doesn't work on the same principle.
namengr
Illinois, United States
Joined: September 01, 2014
KitMaker: 332 posts
Armorama: 328 posts
Joined: September 01, 2014
KitMaker: 332 posts
Armorama: 328 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 11:45 PM UTC
I have one in stash and was thinking of doing it with some of the Paracel figures that I bought recently. Wayne
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 - 12:15 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I immediately thought of the Imperial Japanese Type 2 Ka-mi tank, though it probably doesn't work on the same principle.
I guess they're both designed the same way. This variant has been modified with flotation cells fore and aft and an outboard motor. Maybe the difference is that the Ka-mi flotation cells could be jettisoned. I'm not sure it's the case for this Type 63 variant Type-63C ?) :
The same front flotation cell has been fitted to the Type WZ701 command variant as well :
H.P.
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 - 01:08 AM UTC
http://www.ebay.com/itm/BRONCO-1-35-CB35094-Type-63-2-YW-531B-Armoured-Personnel-Carrier-MODEL-KIT-/361097634314?hash=item541318a20a:g:qp8AAOSwKIpWBAeF
Heh, heh, wonder if THIS type was used in Tiananmen Square in 1989...
Heh, heh, wonder if THIS type was used in Tiananmen Square in 1989...