CMOT
Editor-in-ChiefEngland - South West, United Kingdom
Joined: May 14, 2006
KitMaker: 10,954 posts
Armorama: 8,571 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 11, 2016 - 04:57 PM UTC
Darren Baker takes a look at the Legend Productions M48A2GA2 Detailing Set for the M48A2GA2 from Revell of Germany.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Attica, Greece / Ελλάδα
Joined: June 12, 2015
KitMaker: 921 posts
Armorama: 919 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 11, 2016 - 07:33 PM UTC
This is another great set from Legend. Sure wish they added a barel too, because the kit supplied one is not up to today's standards.
How are the loader's hatch springs formed? By using the brass wire supplied or are they supplied pre-formed?
Thank you for the review.
Italy
Joined: March 14, 2013
KitMaker: 278 posts
Armorama: 278 posts
Posted: Friday, February 12, 2016 - 08:39 PM UTC
Are the tracks of the kit suitable for this version? I've seen some photos of the real tank with different style tracks with rectangular rubber parts, but I don't know enough this tank to know if the old style M-48 tracks are suitable to, although poorly moulded.
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 13, 2016 - 07:50 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Are the tracks of the kit suitable for this version? I've seen some photos of the real tank with different style tracks with rectangular rubber parts, but I don't know enough this tank to know if the old style M-48 tracks are suitable to, although poorly moulded.
Yes, they are the correct tracks for an M48A2GA2. I don't believe Diehl tracks were ever fitted on the M48A2GA2 unless it was a trial version.
"We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people."
July 2005- General R.J. Hillier (Retired), Former Chief of the Defence Staff
Italy
Joined: March 14, 2013
KitMaker: 278 posts
Armorama: 278 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 13, 2016 - 01:53 PM UTC
Probably this was the case.