_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Modern Armor
Modern armor in general.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Dragons MBT70
tanknick22
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: February 19, 2009
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 1,100 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 - 11:29 PM UTC
I just bought dragon's MBT70 from their black label line and im wondering if its a flawed kit like thier
M103 and M6 heavy tank kits, second question on said kit I know the difference between the US and German
Versions was different engine deck,rear hull and different smoke grenade launchers.
How difficuot would it be to convert it to the US
Version
LeoCmdr
Visit this Community
Alberta, Canada
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 4,085 posts
Armorama: 3,917 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 - 11:46 PM UTC
The KPz 70 kit appears to have combined details of two museum prototypes in order to come up with this version.

Overall the detail is OK but it for sure need additional work regardless of whether these were only prototypes.

As you know to create the U.S. version MBT-70 you need to change the hull configuration around the engine deck and rear hull. You would also have to change or add multiple details on the turret. This wouldn't be a fast and simple conversion.

Bear in mind that there were multiple prototypes so as a result the details changed as well.

Voyager makes a detail set for this kit and RB Models has a very nice metal replacement main gun and 20 mm cannon barrel.
tankmodeler
#417
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 01, 2004
KitMaker: 3,123 posts
Armorama: 2,539 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 18, 2016 - 12:07 AM UTC
The answer is that it's moderately flawed.

Not as bad as the M103, more like the M6.

There are apparently differences in the AA canon arrangement if you want to make it into a US version in addition to the engine deck and I seem to remember that the suspension details are different that the US vehicles as well.

If you search for some of the posts when the kit came out, more knowledgeable people than I went through the differences.

Paul
Cuny12
Visit this Community
Australia
Joined: April 04, 2010
KitMaker: 378 posts
Armorama: 348 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 18, 2016 - 03:03 AM UTC
I built this kit and was happy with it, from memory it was a combination of two prototypes made into one kit I also replaced the kit barrel with an RB models one.

Cheers Ben
barkingdigger
Staff MemberAssociate Editor
ARMORAMA
#013
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: June 20, 2008
KitMaker: 3,981 posts
Armorama: 3,403 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 18, 2016 - 03:14 AM UTC
If you want a warts-and-all study, try looking here for my full review of the kit. As others have said, making a US prototype will involve a ton of scratch-building.
tanknick22
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: February 19, 2009
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 1,100 posts
Posted: Monday, February 22, 2016 - 07:15 AM UTC

Quoted Text

If you want a warts-and-all study, try looking here for my full review of the kit. As others have said, making a US prototype will involve a ton of scratch-building.



The kit is better than I thought
 _GOTOTOP