_GOTOBOTTOM
Яusso-Soviэt Forum: Cold War Soviet Armor
For discussions related to cold war era Russo-Soviet armor.
Help with Miniarm DSK-m 12.7 mm (B35059)
Petition2God
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 06, 2002
KitMaker: 1,526 posts
Armorama: 1,294 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 08:15 AM UTC
Hi all,
Can anyone help me with the instruction for Miniarm DSK-m 12.7 mm machine get set (B35059)? I opened the instruction sheet and found that Part VI is pretty much blank due to the printing error:
I am sure it's a gun body assembly but if anyone has a better photo of that instruction part and can share it with me, I'd really appreciate it.

James
bison126
Visit this Community
Correze, France
Joined: June 10, 2004
KitMaker: 5,329 posts
Armorama: 5,204 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 12:00 PM UTC
From your picture, its hard to help. You could show the PE sheet so we can see what PE parts 1 and 5 are. This would be more helpful.

Olivier
Petition2God
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 06, 2002
KitMaker: 1,526 posts
Armorama: 1,294 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 09:35 PM UTC

Quoted Text

From your picture, its hard to help. You could show the PE sheet so we can see what PE parts 1 and 5 are. This would be more helpful.

Olivier


I was looking for someone with the full instruction sheet so I can see the missing portion. I can post the photo of the PE but that does not really address what I was looking for.
Grindcore
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: September 23, 2006
KitMaker: 389 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 17, 2016 - 11:07 PM UTC
I bet part 14 is the MG body
PE 5 and parts 13 are the spade grip
PE 1???? Maybe the cooling jacket or part of the sights, front or rear.

ETA Looking at the Miniarm sight, I think it's the rear sight.
Petition2God
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 06, 2002
KitMaker: 1,526 posts
Armorama: 1,294 posts
Posted: Friday, March 18, 2016 - 02:08 AM UTC
Haha! Thanks for doing the deductive reasoning for me Jimmy. I didn't want to go to that route of solving the puzzle but be my guest. Thanks.

James
 _GOTOTOP