Quoted Text
One pick though is the use of measurements that use things like .8"...!? I know VERY few builders that use rulers graduated in tenths. Metric would be better or at least for this 'ol woodworker maybe 32nds or 64ths...! ;-)
Can I just say that Paul received some feedback after his previous airbrush review regarding his use of measurements, and for this review he provided conversions between US and metric systems.
The feedback then made me curious about the subject of the "thou", i.e. thousandths of an inch, as I too was surprised to see the mix of fractions and decimals used for subdivisions of an inch. There is a quite interesting Wikipedia article on the subject
here which backs up what Paul says about the difficulties of expressing some subdivisions in terms of fractions.
"
The introduction of the thousandth of an inch as a sensible base unit in engineering and machining is generally attributed to Joseph Whitworth who wrote in 1857:
...instead of our engineers and machinists thinking in eighths, sixteenths and thirty-seconds of an inch, it is desirable that they should think and speak in tenths, hundredths, and thousandths...
Whitworth's main point was to advocate decimalization in place of fractions based on successive halving...
...phrases such as "scant 64th" or "heavy 64th" were used, their communicative ability was limited by subjectivity.
"
That seems to go along with what Paul says about the use of terms such as "hairline" being vague. I think while rulers may not be graduated in 1/10ths, but in 1/64ths, this article seems to say that calipers and micrometers are graduated in 1000ths.
Anyway, off topic, and I'm making no criticism of the above observations, but it may be of interest to those also wondering about the mixture of decimals with inches.