Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Black Dog: Flyer 72 ALSVPosted: Sunday, May 22, 2016 - 03:27 AM UTC
Black Dog has announced a full 1/35th scale model of the Flyer 72 ALSV. This is the first full kit I can remember seeing from Black Dog and I will be interested to see how it turns out.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 22, 2016 - 03:42 AM UTC
Really nice looking kit.. I'd really like to get one, so I hope it won't be overly expensive
Hisham
Hisham
Trisaw
California, United States
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 22, 2016 - 05:40 AM UTC
It has the basic rudimentary shape, but I do notice some intricate details and accuracy issues, such as the headlights and front grill are too basic. The side mirrors are missing. The turret ring bars don't have the lightening holes. The doors are missing the raised top diagonal angle where the handle is. And I'm wondering if the tires are large enough. IMHO, the kit needs more parts and PE because the Flyer72 has a lot of grab handles and tie downs. I mean these are areas that are readily apparent from just looking at web photos (for example, take a look at how large the tires on the real Flyer72 are compared to the body).
Perhaps another aftermarket resin company can add and modify some components. I agree...I hope it's not too expensive.
I cheer for the idea of a 1/35 Flyer72 kit, but of course I want one done correctly. I guess I am spoiled with the USSOCOM version as this Flyer72 does represent a standard (2014) Flyer72 pretty well.
To me it seems like this kit was one of the earlier Flyer72s (2014).
Take a look at the Flyer72 today, entering USSOCOM service.
It's a Flyer72 all right, but it's not the USSOCOM's Flyer72 (with supposedly larger tires, more tie downs, redesigned doors and redesigned angled hood, no side panels, racks over the headlights, and other modifications). I also think the USSOCOM Flyer72 may be squatter to fit inside the V-22 and the windshield and rear rowbar angles seem more raked.
Sorry for the nitpicking, but I equate the Flyer72 to USSOCOM's latest version and that was the kit I was hoping for.
Perhaps another aftermarket resin company can add and modify some components. I agree...I hope it's not too expensive.
I cheer for the idea of a 1/35 Flyer72 kit, but of course I want one done correctly. I guess I am spoiled with the USSOCOM version as this Flyer72 does represent a standard (2014) Flyer72 pretty well.
To me it seems like this kit was one of the earlier Flyer72s (2014).
Take a look at the Flyer72 today, entering USSOCOM service.
It's a Flyer72 all right, but it's not the USSOCOM's Flyer72 (with supposedly larger tires, more tie downs, redesigned doors and redesigned angled hood, no side panels, racks over the headlights, and other modifications). I also think the USSOCOM Flyer72 may be squatter to fit inside the V-22 and the windshield and rear rowbar angles seem more raked.
Sorry for the nitpicking, but I equate the Flyer72 to USSOCOM's latest version and that was the kit I was hoping for.
gcdavidson
Ontario, Canada
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 22, 2016 - 08:33 PM UTC
^ Flyer 60.
terminators
France
Joined: February 20, 2012
KitMaker: 1,932 posts
Armorama: 1,907 posts
Joined: February 20, 2012
KitMaker: 1,932 posts
Armorama: 1,907 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 22, 2016 - 09:57 PM UTC
Is it used in operations ?
Trisaw
California, United States
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 22, 2016 - 10:51 PM UTC
Quoted Text
^ Flyer 60.
Whoops, my mistake, and you're correct. The USSOCOM photo is of a Flyer60 (60 inches wide to fit inside a V-22).
Sorry for the mix-up, Blackdog. Your kit is indeed a Flyer72, not a Flyer60...two different vehicles.
henkp
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: September 30, 2005
KitMaker: 1,080 posts
Armorama: 1,064 posts
Joined: September 30, 2005
KitMaker: 1,080 posts
Armorama: 1,064 posts
Posted: Monday, May 23, 2016 - 12:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Really nice looking kit.. I'd really like to get one, so I hope it won't be overly expensive
Hisham
the price 68 euro on the site from blackdog
henk
Posted: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 - 01:22 AM UTC
I don't know a thing about this vehicle but it looks to be a HMMWV frame and suspension. Very sharp looking.
Regards,
Eric
Regards,
Eric
Trisaw
California, United States
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Posted: Monday, July 17, 2017 - 09:24 PM UTC
Has anyone bought or built this kit and can comment?
Trisaw
California, United States
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
Posted: Monday, June 24, 2019 - 01:12 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Has anyone bought or built this kit and can comment?
Anyone?
Someone did a marvelous job on theirs with aftermarket parts. I wonder what aftermarket parts he used.
http://armorama.com/features/7700&page=3