Just saw this posted on Facebook a few minutes ago,
Hosted by Darren Baker
M60A3 from AFV Club on Facebook
CmdrCody
Tennessee, United States
Joined: June 19, 2005
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Joined: June 19, 2005
KitMaker: 152 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 07:34 AM UTC
avenue
Philippines
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 09:17 AM UTC
but isn't M-60A3 fitted with thermal sight?the first tank to do so?
TankSGT
New Jersey, United States
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 09:30 AM UTC
When they were first deployed they used passive sights the thermals were a later upgrade.So early model A3s would need a search light. Hopefully the thermal gunners sight is included.
Tom
Tom
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 10:57 AM UTC
Dang dawg!!
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 11:00 AM UTC
GaryKato
California, United States
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Joined: December 06, 2004
KitMaker: 3,694 posts
Armorama: 2,693 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 12:17 PM UTC
Hopefully with an M60, M728, and Israeli versions to follow.
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 01:12 PM UTC
Quoted Text
When they were first deployed they used passive sights the thermals were a later upgrade.So early model A3s would need a search light. Hopefully the thermal gunners sight is included.
I wouldn't count on it. AFV Club most likely plan to release M60A3 TTS separately later.
TankSGT
New Jersey, United States
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 03:51 PM UTC
Damn the differences are minor.just the shape of the gunners sight, welded over search light plug and then some different cammo. Is it really worth a second kit?
Tom
Tom
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 04:39 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Damn the differences are minor.just the shape of the gunners sight, welded over search light plug and then some different cammo. Is it really worth a second kit?
They could also include later style simplified thermal sleeve for the gun, although of course not all TTS had it.
TankSGT
New Jersey, United States
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 05:37 PM UTC
I forgot about that. It was the same one used on M1s. We even had some gun tubes with the MLRS notch on them. It was a lot easier to use. I don't think any one makes that barrel. I modified a few for some A3s I have built. Buy it or wait that's the question. I may wait since I want to build one of my tanks.Thanks for the reminder Pawel.
Tom
Tom
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 05:42 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I forgot about that. It was the same one used on M1s. We even had some gun tubes with the MLRS notch on them. It was a lot easier to use. I don't think any one makes that barrel.
http://defmodel.com/catalog/htm/dm35015.html
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 06:14 PM UTC
Great news for modern builders. The M60A3 was so widely used that it can be made into a bunch of options.
In a business sense it is totally worth it. I am sure they will sell a bunch of the M60A3 kits and a bunch of the M60A3 TTS kits if they do make one. It will take only one smallish sprue of new parts as well, so no big outlaying of cash for another version. A win-win for AFV Club and modelers.
Individual kits of similar versions make more money for the company than combo kits that build different versions. Take a look at Dragon's M48 series and you will see how many different kits can be sold from similar versions being released separately.
Quoted Text
Damn the differences are minor.just the shape of the gunners sight, welded over search light plug and then some different cammo. Is it really worth a second kit?
In a business sense it is totally worth it. I am sure they will sell a bunch of the M60A3 kits and a bunch of the M60A3 TTS kits if they do make one. It will take only one smallish sprue of new parts as well, so no big outlaying of cash for another version. A win-win for AFV Club and modelers.
Individual kits of similar versions make more money for the company than combo kits that build different versions. Take a look at Dragon's M48 series and you will see how many different kits can be sold from similar versions being released separately.
skyshark
North Carolina, United States
Joined: November 16, 2005
KitMaker: 703 posts
Armorama: 499 posts
Joined: November 16, 2005
KitMaker: 703 posts
Armorama: 499 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 07:23 PM UTC
We also need a AVLB
TankSGT
New Jersey, United States
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 - 09:42 PM UTC
Thanks Panel. Need that barrel.
Tom
Tom
Jennings
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 30, 2016
KitMaker: 73 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Joined: April 30, 2016
KitMaker: 73 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 02:28 AM UTC
Damn you, AFV Club!! You're going to force me into getting back into creepy crawly models!!
:)
:)
Hisham
Al Qahirah, Egypt / لعربية
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Joined: July 23, 2004
KitMaker: 6,856 posts
Armorama: 6,363 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 03:22 AM UTC
cheswickthecat
Washington, United States
Joined: October 13, 2007
KitMaker: 212 posts
Armorama: 208 posts
Joined: October 13, 2007
KitMaker: 212 posts
Armorama: 208 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 04:03 AM UTC
Even the box art is exciting!
Terry
Terry
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 04:06 AM UTC
Jennings
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 30, 2016
KitMaker: 73 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Joined: April 30, 2016
KitMaker: 73 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 04:33 AM UTC
Interestingly, almost all of the foreign M60A3s you see still have the commander's coupola.
Tankrider
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,208 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 1,280 posts
Armorama: 1,208 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 04:50 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Is this one good for an Egyptian vehicle like the ones in this pic?
Hisham
Hisham,
The AFV Club kit will work out of the box for those Egyptian M60A3s in your first picture. It looks as the Egyptian Army has a mix of M60A3 tanks with the thermal as well as passive gunner sights. The tank in the second picture is definitely a M60A3 TTS.
John
John
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 04:51 AM UTC
One of the Egyptian tanks clearly has the searchlight so they probably aren't TTS. At one point the thermal sights weren't exported and were even removed from exported tanks taken from US surplus.
And unlike the M48, there really wasn't anything wrong with the cupola on an M60.
And unlike the M48, there really wasn't anything wrong with the cupola on an M60.
tankerken6011
New Mexico, United States
Joined: December 04, 2013
KitMaker: 84 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Joined: December 04, 2013
KitMaker: 84 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 07:58 AM UTC
Quoted Text
And unlike the M48, there really wasn't anything wrong with the cupola on an M60.
A lot of people really hated that M-85 machinegun.
Ken.
TankSGT
New Jersey, United States
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 03:50 PM UTC
I never had issues with the M85. Putting it in the cupola was a real pain though.
Tom
Tom
TankSGT
New Jersey, United States
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Joined: July 25, 2006
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 946 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 04:02 PM UTC
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 16, 2016 - 04:36 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Damn the differences are minor.just the shape of the gunners sight, welded over search light plug and then some different cammo. Is it really worth a second kit?
Tom
Agree, but still not too far-fetched- AFV CLUB did their M5A1 (Early) and (Late) Stuart kits, even though the differences between the two variants are relatively minor. They COULD have just included the few parts for each variant in the same kit, but didn't- MORE MONEY to be made with TWO separate kits, instead...