Is this picture legit, were Panther Type F's used in combat ?
http://abload.de/img/pantherf15djqp.jpg
Your thoughts.
Thanks Milojko
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Panther F Type used in combat
milojko
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: July 24, 2002
KitMaker: 143 posts
Armorama: 124 posts
Joined: July 24, 2002
KitMaker: 143 posts
Armorama: 124 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 - 11:09 PM UTC
brekinapez
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 - 11:16 PM UTC
I see nothing that indicates one way or another if the Panther saw combat. All I see is a bunch of vehicles that have apparently been gathered up for some purpose - presumably to be inventoried by Allied forces after capture.
A couple were built, but there is still no documentation proving they were ever used beyond testing as far as I am aware.
A couple were built, but there is still no documentation proving they were ever used beyond testing as far as I am aware.
chnoone
Armed Forces Europe, United States
Joined: January 01, 2009
KitMaker: 1,036 posts
Armorama: 1,033 posts
Joined: January 01, 2009
KitMaker: 1,036 posts
Armorama: 1,033 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 - 11:36 PM UTC
Looks like a fake !
Pics of a Normandy collection point in summer of 1944 as I recall, the original pic probably shows a Panther A or G.
Cheers
Christopher
Pics of a Normandy collection point in summer of 1944 as I recall, the original pic probably shows a Panther A or G.
Cheers
Christopher
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 - 11:46 PM UTC
Definitely faked. The original has been published numerous times.
jasegreene
Florida, United States
Joined: October 21, 2013
KitMaker: 751 posts
Armorama: 751 posts
Joined: October 21, 2013
KitMaker: 751 posts
Armorama: 751 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 - 11:52 PM UTC
The only Panther ausf.F I have seen that was real was the prototype that had an ausf.G turret.That photo I am not sure is real,has too many marks of Photoshop.
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 01:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The only Panther ausf.F I have seen that was real was the prototype that had an ausf.G turret.That photo I am not sure is real,has too many marks of Photoshop.
You're thinking of the Panther II.
Jeff
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 02:28 AM UTC
Yes, it was an Ausf A; the whole vehicle has been substituted in the doctored image (at least they didn't stick a Schmalturm on the original Zimmerit-covered A hull). Still, no doubt this version will show up and fool people for a few years yet.
m4sherman
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 04:28 AM UTC
I found that one looking for some info on the F. I think it was done by one of the World of Warcraft people. They have some interesting debates once in a while.
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 12:11 PM UTC
Here's a side-by-side pic:
m4sherman
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 05:47 PM UTC
You have to admit, it was very well done.
jrutman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 10, 2011
KitMaker: 7,941 posts
Armorama: 7,934 posts
Joined: April 10, 2011
KitMaker: 7,941 posts
Armorama: 7,934 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 06:24 PM UTC
Although the pic is obviously bogus,it does illustrate how far the art of photoshop has progressed. So,buyer beware when you go online to buy those "rare" photos.
J
J
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 06:37 PM UTC
Now that it's been seen in a picture I wonder if we'll see it for sale as a PanzerLehr vehicle, Normandy 1944 in styrene.
Lol
Lol
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 06:48 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Now that it's been seen in a picture I wonder if we'll see it for sale as a PanzerLehr vehicle, Normandy 1944 in styrene.
Lol
Yeah... DRAGON will try to fob it off on us, crying "NEW!!!" in their propaganda releases!!!
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 06:53 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextThe only Panther ausf.F I have seen that was real was the prototype that had an ausf.G turret.That photo I am not sure is real,has too many marks of Photoshop.
You're thinking of the Panther II.
Jeff
Whoa! I saw the Panther II depicted in the RYTON Panther Book as having a "Schmalturm" mounted, not an Ausf.G Turret- Did the Germans ever even commit an actual Panther II to paper, i.e, blueprints or conceptual drawings? Just asking...
m4sherman
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 07, 2016 - 07:49 PM UTC
Do a search on Panther II. There are a couple builds here that discuss the Panther II. I'm sneaking online at work, so can't dig up the links.
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Friday, July 08, 2016 - 12:04 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextQuoted TextThe only Panther ausf.F I have seen that was real was the prototype that had an ausf.G turret.That photo I am not sure is real,has too many marks of Photoshop.
You're thinking of the Panther II.
Jeff
Whoa! I saw the Panther II depicted in the RYTON Panther Book as having a "Schmalturm" mounted, not an Ausf.G Turret- Did the Germans ever even commit an actual Panther II to paper, i.e, blueprints or conceptual drawings? Just asking...
The Panther II hull never received a turret, just a test weight for automotive tests. US personnel added a 1945 Ausf G turret before shipping it stateside. In this form, it sat in the Patton Museum for decades.
There were three Panther F hulls on the assembly line at the Daimler Benz plant when it was captured in 1945, but no F turrets were photographed. Delivery records for the last four days of production are missing, so some sort of F hull/G turret mash-ups may have been delivered.
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Friday, July 08, 2016 - 04:44 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextQuoted TextQuoted TextThe only Panther ausf.F I have seen that was real was the prototype that had an ausf.G turret.That photo I am not sure is real,has too many marks of Photoshop.
You're thinking of the Panther II.
Jeff
Whoa! I saw the Panther II depicted in the RYTON Panther Book as having a "Schmalturm" mounted, not an Ausf.G Turret- Did the Germans ever even commit an actual Panther II to paper, i.e, blueprints or conceptual drawings? Just asking...
The Panther II hull never received a turret, just a test weight for automotive tests. US personnel added a 1945 Ausf G turret before shipping it stateside. In this form, it sat in the Patton Museum for decades.
There were three Panther F hulls on the assembly line at the Daimler Benz plant when it was captured in 1945, but no F turrets were photographed. Delivery records for the last four days of production are missing, so some sort of F hull/G turret mash-ups may have been delivered.
Let me back up a bit- The Panther II that I was referring to in the RYTON Panther book is depicted in a blueprint-type DRAWING, with a "Schmallturm" mounted atop the Hull. I expect that the old DRAGON Panther II kit (6024?) was based upon this drawing. Also, even back then, DRAGON got the Hull and Suspension wrong, i.e, the Inner and Outer Road Wheel positions are reversed, if one compares the kit to the RYTON drawing- But this is all "pie-in-the-sky", since, if I'm reading Gerald's post right, the "real" Panther II was a GI-lash-up of an Ausf.F with an Ausf.G Turret... (?)
jrutman
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 10, 2011
KitMaker: 7,941 posts
Armorama: 7,934 posts
Joined: April 10, 2011
KitMaker: 7,941 posts
Armorama: 7,934 posts
Posted: Friday, July 08, 2016 - 06:13 PM UTC
There were some PantherII small turrets produced and at least one was used for ballistic firing tests by the Brits after the war. I think the remnants may still exist?
J
J
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Friday, July 08, 2016 - 06:14 PM UTC
Panther II was nothing to do with Panther F. It was an uparmoured hull proposal from much earlier in the project and was ditched when Schuerzen were added to the D. Panther F was to have replaced the G and would have had the Schmalturm had it been produced beyond a few hulls. The Knox example had a G turret fitted after capture.
That's from memory as I don't pack my library of Panzer Tracts when I go on holiday though.
That's from memory as I don't pack my library of Panzer Tracts when I go on holiday though.
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Friday, July 08, 2016 - 07:57 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextQuoted TextQuoted TextQuoted TextThe only Panther ausf.F I have seen that was real was the prototype that had an ausf.G turret.That photo I am not sure is real,has too many marks of Photoshop.
You're thinking of the Panther II.
Jeff
Whoa! I saw the Panther II depicted in the RYTON Panther Book as having a "Schmalturm" mounted, not an Ausf.G Turret- Did the Germans ever even commit an actual Panther II to paper, i.e, blueprints or conceptual drawings? Just asking...
The Panther II hull never received a turret, just a test weight for automotive tests. US personnel added a 1945 Ausf G turret before shipping it stateside. In this form, it sat in the Patton Museum for decades.
There were three Panther F hulls on the assembly line at the Daimler Benz plant when it was captured in 1945, but no F turrets were photographed. Delivery records for the last four days of production are missing, so some sort of F hull/G turret mash-ups may have been delivered.
Let me back up a bit- The Panther II that I was referring to in the RYTON Panther book is depicted in a blueprint-type DRAWING, with a "Schmallturm" mounted atop the Hull. I expect that the old DRAGON Panther II kit (6024?) was based upon this drawing. Also, even back then, DRAGON got the Hull and Suspension wrong, i.e, the Inner and Outer Road Wheel positions are reversed, if one compares the kit to the RYTON drawing- But this is all "pie-in-the-sky", since, if I'm reading Gerald's post right, the "real" Panther II was a GI-lash-up of an Ausf.F with an Ausf.G Turret... (?)
The Panther that was at Ft. Knox and later moved to Ft. Benning was that of the Panther II running chassis/lower hull and a Late Ausf.G turret placed on it.
http://www.peachmountain.com/5star/Tanks_Patton_Tanks_PantherII_Tank.aspx
Nothing to do with a Panther F at all.
Jeff
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Friday, July 08, 2016 - 08:49 PM UTC
You could very well be right about the Knox one being a II hull. I have seen it but not paid much attention. Interesting that it has been fitted for Schuerzen though, which I recall Jentz writing was the addition which caused the demise of the II project. It wouldn't have had a Schmalturm anyway.
PantherF
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Joined: June 10, 2005
KitMaker: 6,188 posts
Armorama: 5,960 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 09, 2016 - 12:00 AM UTC
Quoted Text
You could very well be right about the Knox one being a II hull. I have seen it but not paid much attention. Interesting that it has been fitted for Schuerzen though, which I recall Jentz writing was the addition which caused the demise of the II project. It wouldn't have had a Schmalturm anyway.
Not "could" be but I am right.
Here are a few more images of it: http://svsm.org/gallery/PzKpfwVPantherII
(and it wasn't the Schürzen that killed the PII project)
Jeff
Chuck4
United States
Joined: November 13, 2013
KitMaker: 403 posts
Armorama: 401 posts
Joined: November 13, 2013
KitMaker: 403 posts
Armorama: 401 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 09, 2016 - 06:07 AM UTC
Panther II was a late 1942 project to build a successor to the Panther that would be built in parallel to the tiger II, which was also a late 1942 project to build a successor to the tiger I.
The main difference between Panther I and Panther II are Panther II would have much heavier armor, basically armored half way between Panther I and tiger II. Panther II was also to have simplified suspension borrowed from the tiger II, and share many other minor components from the tiger II, such as engine deck and crew hatches. A narrow turret was designed for the Panther II, and it was to mount a 88mm f/56.
Panther II production plans was cancelled in early 1943 because it was too heavy, expected to have inadaquate mobility for a medium tank, the design made it impossible to use most of the interior components already being manufactured for the panther I, and the overall didn't offer sufficient improvement over the Panther I to justify the disruption that would result to stop the production of panther I and retool the factories for Panther II. Some elements of the Panther II hull design, such as the one piece sponson sides and slanting sponson floor, was worked into the panther G design.
Panther F's turret was based on the turret designed for Panther II, but was lighter, intended to mount the 75mm f/70 gun, and dimensionally different from the panther II turret.
Although Panther II production plans were cancelled, for some reason resources were allowed to dissipated by continuing the construction of the superfluous Panther II prototype. That was the prototype shipped to the US..
The main difference between Panther I and Panther II are Panther II would have much heavier armor, basically armored half way between Panther I and tiger II. Panther II was also to have simplified suspension borrowed from the tiger II, and share many other minor components from the tiger II, such as engine deck and crew hatches. A narrow turret was designed for the Panther II, and it was to mount a 88mm f/56.
Panther II production plans was cancelled in early 1943 because it was too heavy, expected to have inadaquate mobility for a medium tank, the design made it impossible to use most of the interior components already being manufactured for the panther I, and the overall didn't offer sufficient improvement over the Panther I to justify the disruption that would result to stop the production of panther I and retool the factories for Panther II. Some elements of the Panther II hull design, such as the one piece sponson sides and slanting sponson floor, was worked into the panther G design.
Panther F's turret was based on the turret designed for Panther II, but was lighter, intended to mount the 75mm f/70 gun, and dimensionally different from the panther II turret.
Although Panther II production plans were cancelled, for some reason resources were allowed to dissipated by continuing the construction of the superfluous Panther II prototype. That was the prototype shipped to the US..
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Monday, July 11, 2016 - 03:09 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Panther II was a late 1942 project to build a successor to the Panther that would be built in parallel to the tiger II, which was also a late 1942 project to build a successor to the tiger I.
The main difference between Panther I and Panther II are Panther II would have much heavier armor, basically armored half way between Panther I and tiger II. Panther II was also to have simplified suspension borrowed from the tiger II, and share many other minor components from the tiger II, such as engine deck and crew hatches. A narrow turret was designed for the Panther II, and it was to mount a 88mm f/56.
Panther II production plans was cancelled in early 1943 because it was too heavy, expected to have inadaquate mobility for a medium tank, the design made it impossible to use most of the interior components already being manufactured for the panther I, and the overall didn't offer sufficient improvement over the Panther I to justify the disruption that would result to stop the production of panther I and retool the factories for Panther II. Some elements of the Panther II hull design, such as the one piece sponson sides and slanting sponson floor, was worked into the panther G design.
Panther F's turret was based on the turret designed for Panther II, but was lighter, intended to mount the 75mm f/70 gun, and dimensionally different from the panther II turret.
Although Panther II production plans were cancelled, for some reason resources were allowed to dissipated by continuing the construction of the superfluous Panther II prototype. That was the prototype shipped to the US..
The Hilary Doyle drawing in the Panzer Tracts book shows only an interim turret design with minimal detail ghosted onto the drawing for the Panther II, resembling a slightly stretched Panther turret.
Neither Schmal turret design was officially associated with the Panther II, though one might speculate about one being adopted, had the tank ever entered production.