Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Dragon 1/35 M60 MBt in at local shop.What is
phantom8747
Alabama, United States
Joined: March 09, 2015
KitMaker: 281 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Joined: March 09, 2015
KitMaker: 281 posts
Armorama: 273 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 05:13 PM UTC
$86 list shop is selling for $66. What is wrong with this kit? Been waiting forever for the early M60. Thanks for any links. Is it another Dragon mistake? Thanks.
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 05:15 PM UTC
Quoted Text
$86 list shop is selling for $66. What is wrong with this kit? Been waiting forever for the early M60. Thanks for any links. Is it another Dragon mistake? Thanks.
Yes, it is. And I'm saying this despite the fact that my name is in the kit instructions...
Not as bad as their M60A2, but still far from good, I'm afraid.
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 06:37 PM UTC
So they didn't manage to improve on their awful first CAD shown of the kit?
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 07:08 PM UTC
Quoted Text
So they didn't manage to improve on their awful first CAD shown of the kit?
Improve - yes. Fully correct - no...
Belt_Fed
New Jersey, United States
Joined: February 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,325 posts
Joined: February 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,325 posts
Posted: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - 07:45 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextSo they didn't manage to improve on their awful first CAD shown of the kit?
Improve - yes. Fully correct - no...
Can you explain what is wrong with it?
denstore
Skåne, Sweden
Joined: January 05, 2009
KitMaker: 83 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Joined: January 05, 2009
KitMaker: 83 posts
Armorama: 69 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 03:07 AM UTC
What about the surface detail? Is it similar to the Dragon M48?
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 09:02 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Can you explain what is wrong with it?
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47209/message/1468159715/If+you%27re+not+on+FaceBook...
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 09:02 AM UTC
Quoted Text
What about the surface detail? Is it similar to the Dragon M48?
Yes.
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 11:08 AM UTC
Would kit bashing this kit would with the AFV Club work? What parts would you need to use to make an improved initial M60.
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2016 - 12:56 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
Can you explain what is wrong with it?
http://www.network54.com/Forum/47209/message/1468159715/If+you%27re+not+on+FaceBook...
Just read the Network54 forum- My suspicions ARE CORRECT! DRAGON DOES IT AGAIN!!!