Anyone heard of this before?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_7wsaTkFgw
Hosted by Darren Baker
Wiesel 2 LRV soon with the US Army?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7618d/7618dec8302d6f2731951f947e567ee494835825" alt=""
HermannB
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbb7f/bbb7f1427212dbec5047e3a0ba0a85d45254e010" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: October 14, 2008
KitMaker: 4,099 posts
Armorama: 4,067 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08563/085630d035bd873dfbd7c4e7d5bd92b329aa71f1" alt="General"
Posted: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 - 07:26 PM UTC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52ffa/52ffa88d79ca85988351d9dbba3c84377b6549f6" alt=""
SEDimmick
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d874a/d874a14df983bd3c298ba3422d2055f7c4439604" alt="Sergeant Major"
Posted: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 - 09:11 PM UTC
It was part of vehicles the US Army was looking at/testing for the Lightweight Recon Vehicle (LRV) program. The program was cancelled about 2 months ago and the Army decided to go with the JLTV instead
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/06/03/army-nixes-light-recon-vehicle-taps-humvee-replacement-mission.html
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/06/03/army-nixes-light-recon-vehicle-taps-humvee-replacement-mission.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb13d/eb13db010c3b110f1d9d45b05e2bcbf514e8bac0" alt=""
Platycqb
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: June 15, 2015
KitMaker: 76 posts
Armorama: 72 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2431a/2431a2b83c59190f013500e0c4228441c435359b" alt="2nd Lieutenant"
Posted: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 - 09:33 PM UTC
Interestingly (or not), today is the anniversary of the contract attribution to Oshkosh Defense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bac5/4bac55daf339e360db0fac2a0c194d81661c2e3a" alt=""
historianmodeler
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: October 27, 2013
KitMaker: 62 posts
Armorama: 62 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 - 09:41 PM UTC
It was a great idea. But you know it wasn't American so why bother. Would have saved a lot of $$$$$$$. Besides if it can be air dropped, the 82ND would love to have it as a simple APC to move people and gear.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99a89/99a89adf585b98b06870d9aed0300280f2091403" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7618d/7618dec8302d6f2731951f947e567ee494835825" alt=""
DG0542
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: March 04, 2015
KitMaker: 125 posts
Armorama: 125 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89747/89747c6e3f22ed31b9d50a73cf3dd966321a14e3" alt="1st Lieutenant"
Posted: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 - 10:28 PM UTC
The Army came out and said that the JLTV can meet the LRV requirements if it could mount a 30mm Cannon and sit two more additional men...they want to got a 6 vehicle platoon (6x36 Profile they called it) and the Vanilla JLTV would mean a 9 Vehicle Recon Platoon. But were other's happy with the product stating it fills 90% of the requirements as is.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/08/25/jltv-needs-bigger-gun-more-seats-scout-mission-maneuver-leaders.html
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/08/25/jltv-needs-bigger-gun-more-seats-scout-mission-maneuver-leaders.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49199/49199c365881f16a15afd392a5071335e7a32d5b" alt=""
Trisaw
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 4,105 posts
Armorama: 2,492 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b71cb/b71cbabb1b3e0b1606cd88d26ba6e59221c1c6cf" alt=""
Posted: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 - 11:00 PM UTC
The US Army could have also went with the cancelled US-made Shadow RST-V which is RO/RO off a CH-46 so it could fit in a CH-47, I would assume. It's not really bulletproof in the plain version, but with add-on armor could be armored.
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/shadow
The Wiesel 1 was tested by the US Army for the BCT idea so the US Army knows about the Wiesels.
There's a lot of nice concepts that the US Army tested. Unfortunately, not many were fielded.
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/shadow
The Wiesel 1 was tested by the US Army for the BCT idea so the US Army knows about the Wiesels.
There's a lot of nice concepts that the US Army tested. Unfortunately, not many were fielded.
![]() |