This is the old 1/35 M3 Lee from Tamiya with many details and scratch built parts: RB Model 35B76 barrel set, Voyager Model TE047 Letters and Figures, Eduard PE 35433, links from Academy, Browning .30 from AFV, Armo Decals Lend-Lease vehicles part 2, and others. Scratch built rivets and engine parts.
Hosted by Darren Baker
M3 Lee Red Army
Mendes
Parana, Brazil
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 05:05 AM UTC
joepanzer
North Carolina, United States
Joined: January 21, 2004
KitMaker: 803 posts
Armorama: 740 posts
Joined: January 21, 2004
KitMaker: 803 posts
Armorama: 740 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 05:21 AM UTC
What did the Russians think of this vehicle compared to, say the T-34?
Or would it draw comparison to one of their multi-turret behemoths?
Or would it draw comparison to one of their multi-turret behemoths?
Mendes
Parana, Brazil
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 05:37 AM UTC
The Soviets quickly realised this tank was not good, and after one year of hard fighting, the surviving ones (infamously called "collective grave for six people") were retired from front-line operations and shipped to quieter or less well-defended sectors.
The T-34 was far superior in all aspects...
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 06:01 AM UTC
Very nice presentation of Tamiya's old war horse. Modelers considering the Tamiya kit should be advised that it has the engine deck of a gasoline-powered M3, but the upper tail plate of a diesel M3A5 (curiously, Tamiya's Grant has the correct rear arrangement). It also has some dimensional problems common to kits from the early 1970's, and the kit tracks had end connectors that were centered on the track blocks instead of being in between them, so they didn't connect anything. This made the vinyl more flexible, but it is annoying today.
Academy's M3 Lee kit is more accurate overall, though the exhaust arrangement depicts a very early production model. The first release of the kit had incorrect, overly tall suspension bogies, but Academy went back and corrected those parts, so current kits are correct. However, the lowered suspension means that the tracks are now too loose, so aftermarket tracks might be a good investment.
Academy's M3 Lee kit is more accurate overall, though the exhaust arrangement depicts a very early production model. The first release of the kit had incorrect, overly tall suspension bogies, but Academy went back and corrected those parts, so current kits are correct. However, the lowered suspension means that the tracks are now too loose, so aftermarket tracks might be a good investment.
Mendes
Parana, Brazil
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 06:10 AM UTC
Many thanks Gerald.
I agree with your comments.
Cheers
I agree with your comments.
Cheers
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 06:23 AM UTC
Nice redress of the old kit. I did similar work to one to make a 1941 First Armored Division vehicle. The original eduard photo etch set actually had etch pieces to correct the rear hull and exhaust.
I did Tamiya's Grant as the diesel engined Mark II. I have one left for a Girls und Panzer build with parts from the Grant and a new suspension.
I did Tamiya's Grant as the diesel engined Mark II. I have one left for a Girls und Panzer build with parts from the Grant and a new suspension.
hanb7323
Daejeon, Korea / 대한민국
Joined: October 06, 2014
KitMaker: 408 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Joined: October 06, 2014
KitMaker: 408 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 07:51 AM UTC
Nice. This is not easy subject IMO. But you've done this fantastic. Congratulations
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 09:14 AM UTC
For how poorly regarded the tank was in Soviet service there is a reconstruction of one that appeared in the movie White Tiger.
A Brigade equipped with Lee's fought at Kursk. They were the best armed of the available Lend-lease armor in 1943.
A Brigade equipped with Lee's fought at Kursk. They were the best armed of the available Lend-lease armor in 1943.
Mendes
Parana, Brazil
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 04:10 PM UTC
Thanks Stephen.
I would love to see your work with Lee and Grant tanks.
I would love to see your work with Lee and Grant tanks.
Mendes
Parana, Brazil
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Joined: April 19, 2012
KitMaker: 182 posts
Armorama: 181 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 - 04:11 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Nice. This is not easy subject IMO. But you've done this fantastic. Congratulations
Many thanks, glad you like it.
Cheers from Brazil.