Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
M60 Blazer
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 01, 2016 - 11:17 PM UTC
That's exactly what I said yesterday; Academy has better blazer, but Esci (now Italeri) is the better M60A1. But if you can get it cheap, like I did for $4.99 back in the 90s, it's not a bad OOB option. I have at least 2-3 kits worth of Esci Blazer armor that won't be used.
Cantstopbuyingkits
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 01, 2016 - 11:20 PM UTC
If you don't want to buy the full Acedamy kit, is there an AM option for the ERA blocks?
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Saturday, October 01, 2016 - 11:46 PM UTC
A while ago Verlinden did the armor set (#398) for the original Tamiya kit. It only included the armor, you had to scratch build the mounts and while it came with an urdan cupola, you had to buy their IDF detail set, machine guns and other detail parts.
I used the Verlinden set I had back in the 80s and added it to the Esci Blazer kit. It was an effective combination back then. I originally tried adding it to the Tamiya kit, but was not having fun with it. It sat until the Esci kit arrived.
There is also a legends set LP1110 Magach 6B Blazer Armor.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/360012706078?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_noapp=true
I used the Verlinden set I had back in the 80s and added it to the Esci Blazer kit. It was an effective combination back then. I originally tried adding it to the Tamiya kit, but was not having fun with it. It sat until the Esci kit arrived.
There is also a legends set LP1110 Magach 6B Blazer Armor.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/360012706078?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_noapp=true
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2016 - 08:39 AM UTC
Hello John,
While I can't answer your question completely, I may be able to ad to the puzzle.
I photographed a significant number of US ARMY M60A3's with reactive armor blocks and with mounts minus the blocks at Fort Hood a few years ago. They were in storage. I do not know for certain if these tanks had been part of a regular TO&E or not, but, there seemed to be at least half a batt worth. I was led to believe that it was only the USMC who had placed them in service until I saw these.
I will have to do some checking to see if there are any unit markings visible in any of the pictures that I have.
What John C. Said regarding their possible use in ROK makes sense to me.
Respectfully,
Allen
While I can't answer your question completely, I may be able to ad to the puzzle.
I photographed a significant number of US ARMY M60A3's with reactive armor blocks and with mounts minus the blocks at Fort Hood a few years ago. They were in storage. I do not know for certain if these tanks had been part of a regular TO&E or not, but, there seemed to be at least half a batt worth. I was led to believe that it was only the USMC who had placed them in service until I saw these.
I will have to do some checking to see if there are any unit markings visible in any of the pictures that I have.
What John C. Said regarding their possible use in ROK makes sense to me.
Respectfully,
Allen
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2016 - 09:14 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
As I understand it, from several different reviews that I've read, the AFV CLUB M60A1 kit is a representation of a "mid-production"-vehicle. I would like to know specifically which features, besides the "obvious" Armor Plates, differentiate the M60A1 from the M60A1 "Blazer". Were "Blazers" converted from "early", "mid", or "late"-type M60A1s, or were they converted from a "hodge-podge" of all three, if there even were such things as "early", "mid", or "late" -A1s..?
The AFV Club, and most M60A1 models (less the original Tamiya M60A1) are mid or late production tank kits. The identifying feature between mid and early A1s is the presence of "chin armor" on the front edges below the mantlet. I think the old Tamiya kit is the only one without the chin armor. See the photo below and you can see additional armor weld beginning at the bottom edge of the turret by the canvas cover and it continues until it reaches the turret ring. It was added to eliminate a trap shot discovered during Israel's use of the tank in combat.
What differentiates the mid from the late is normally the tracks, road wheels and air cleaners. The original style tracks, aluminum "finned" road wheels (strengthening ribs along the inner portion of the road wheels) and original side loading air cleaners are considered early to mid.
It should be noted that the entire fleet of M60s was progressively updated as time went on. So early to mid is actually a time frame not a production frame.
Tanks that originally lacked the cheek fillets had them added as either fills or cast plugs welded in. The turret ring fills were originally add on welds and late production vehicles (ones produced as M60A3) had them cast into the turret.
There were on-going modernization programs throughout the service life. The RISE program was one. Wheels and tracks were updated as they wore out. Air cleaners were changed when a tank was in for service.
So you have to decide a time frame and then research the typical load out of that time period. Let's use 1989 as an example. US Army tanks were M60A3. Top loading air cleaners and T-142 hex track were standard. Steel road wheels were common but finned aluminum ones were around. Cheek fillets were standard but turret ring guards varied. They never became a universal fitting.
To really know the history you'd have to jump into the driver's hole and look at the data plate. There were some slick M60s caught up in the M60A3 program. You could tell from the flame cut marks from where they moved the return rollers and added the shock absorber. There was at least one M60A2. Why they went through all the trouble of cutting and refitting the whole rear hull is beyond me but I saw that data plate and all the cuts and welds on the rear. And naturally I was without a camera. And that tank is part of an artificial reef somewhere.
Scarred
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2016 - 11:59 AM UTC
Not being a M60 aficionado unless they were IDF, how does the Gunze Sangyo M60A1 w/RISE rate?
Removed by original poster on 10/03/16 - 14:39:06 (GMT).
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2016 - 07:45 PM UTC
Having already stated earlier in this thread that I'm no "expert, regarding "modern" US Armor & Soft-skins", let me say that the info that ALL of you guys are sharing is worth it's weight in gold, to me...
I'm going to need to invest in more reference material and ask more questions, if I want to really build, detail and paint the most accurate "modern" subjects that I can...
THANKS TO ALL!!!
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2016 - 11:00 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Not being a M60 aficionado unless they were IDF, how does the Gunze Sangyo M60A1 w/RISE rate?
The Gunze Sangyo M60A1 RISE/Passive kit with ERA is the Esci M60A1 kit (same base kit as the Blazer).
The main problem right off the bat with using this kit is that Marine Corps M60A1s during Desert Storm tended to use only the smooth steel road wheels. After market wheels are available though, but when you pay what this kit originally retailed for, you should be able to get a high quality model out of box. Especially one that says "HIGH TECH MODEL".
It includes white metal ERA and mounts, smoke grenade launchers and storage boxes as well as a pair of white metal top loading air cleaners.
I bought one in 2009 for $35, mainly for collecting purposes and not to build. I've already tackled the Desert Storm era A1 w/ERA by building one of my $5 Esci Blazer kits, but replacing the armor, air cleaners and road wheels, as well as decals from the Tamiya kit.
Today, the best combination would be to start with AFV club and add armor, grenade launchers, air cleaners from either the Academy or Tamiya kit. Whichever is cheaper.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2016 - 11:07 PM UTC
Quoted Text
...M60A1 RISE/Passive kit with ERA...
...
Today, the best combination would be to start with AFV club and add armor, grenade launchers, air cleaners from either the Academy or Tamiya kit. Whichever is cheaper.
Actually, the AFV Club M60A1 has the top-loading air cleaners in the kit as not-used pieces. You would just need the grenade launchers and storage boxes for them, available in the Legend M60A1 Basic Detailing set (LF1305), along with some other nice pieces.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2016 - 11:11 PM UTC
You'd still need the ERA which would be cheapest to get the Academy kit for the armor than after market ones.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Sunday, October 02, 2016 - 11:17 PM UTC
Right, I just meant to get an M60A1 RISE/Passive tank. Poor editing on my part leaving the ERA part. Good catch.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 12:50 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Right, I just meant to get an M60A1 RISE/Passive tank. Poor editing on my part leaving the ERA part. Good catch.
And there's still the aluminum vs. steel road wheels issue. I know the Tamiya USMC M60A1 RISE/Passive w/ERA contains steel road wheels as does the Academy M60A1 RISE/Passive w/ERA, but Academy has those nasty vinyl outer road wheel treads.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 01:49 AM UTC
Quoted Text
And there's still the aluminum vs. steel road wheels issue.
AFV Club to the rescue again. The AFV Club M60A1 kit has a full set of both the aluminum and steel road wheels included. I am pretty sure they will come out with a USMC ODS M60A1 RISE/Passive eventually. All they would need to add for a basic one is the smoke launchers and the storage boxes, and ERA if they wanted to. They already have the launchers and storage boxes in their M60A3 kit.
Scarred
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 02:25 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextNot being a M60 aficionado unless they were IDF, how does the Gunze Sangyo M60A1 w/RISE rate?
The Gunze Sangyo M60A1 RISE/Passive kit with ERA is the Esci M60A1 kit (same base kit as the Blazer).
The main problem right off the bat with using this kit is that Marine Corps M60A1s during Desert Storm tended to use only the smooth steel road wheels. After market wheels are available though, but when you pay what this kit originally retailed for, you should be able to get a high quality model out of box. Especially one that says "HIGH TECH MODEL".
It includes white metal ERA and mounts, smoke grenade launchers and storage boxes as well as a pair of white metal top loading air cleaners.
I bought one in 2009 for $35, mainly for collecting purposes and not to build. I've already tackled the Desert Storm era A1 w/ERA by building one of my $5 Esci Blazer kits, but replacing the armor, air cleaners and road wheels, as well as decals from the Tamiya kit.
Today, the best combination would be to start with AFV club and add armor, grenade launchers, air cleaners from either the Academy or Tamiya kit. Whichever is cheaper.
Tanks for the info. A friend died suddenly several years back who had a hobby shop that had gone out of business and when we went thru his storage units there were boxes of hundreds of models, cars, sci-fi, anime, aircraft, ships, military, after market parts, books, paints and tools. His family didn't want them so I took them, sorted them and we had a garage sale to raise money for his funeral. The only thing that didn't sail were most of the armor kits. In there was 2 Gunze Sangyo M60's w/RISE, 1 Academy M60 with RISE, 2 Tamiya A3's and Verlindin's M60 Blazer, which I had built a version of many years ago.
exgrunt
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: December 17, 2013
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 301 posts
Joined: December 17, 2013
KitMaker: 301 posts
Armorama: 301 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 05:31 AM UTC
Quoted Text
In Germany, we were issued the manuals to install ERA to our A3s, but went to M1A1s instead (1989). I think 2ID in Korea was supposed to add it as well because the ERA manuals had an adjustment to accommodate the loader's machine gun present on their A3s.
I've never seen any reference to loader's MG on US Army A3's. I assume this was a pintle-mounted M60? Any pics of this, I'm really interested.
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 05:58 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextIn Germany, we were issued the manuals to install ERA to our A3s, but went to M1A1s instead (1989). I think 2ID in Korea was supposed to add it as well because the ERA manuals had an adjustment to accommodate the loader's machine gun present on their A3s.
I've never seen any reference to loader's MG on US Army A3's. I assume this was a pintle-mounted M60? Any pics of this, I'm really interested.
Probably would be the same mounts as were on their M48A5? I know the National Guard units with M48A5 retained their M60D machine guns and I saw a mount that had been cut off one of the M48A5 before they went away.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 08:55 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextIn Germany, we were issued the manuals to install ERA to our A3s, but went to M1A1s instead (1989). I think 2ID in Korea was supposed to add it as well because the ERA manuals had an adjustment to accommodate the loader's machine gun present on their A3s.
I've never seen any reference to loader's MG on US Army A3's. I assume this was a pintle-mounted M60? Any pics of this, I'm really interested.
2ID M60A3TTS tanks removed the two mounts from the loader's position on their M48A5s when they transitioned. One is located forward of the loader's hatch in a simple pintle mount and the other is the dog legged one on the side of the turret. That mount requires modification of the standard ERA set up. The M60D is used and moved from the side to the forward position as needed.
One of my face book friends has some photos of his tank, I'll ask to forward some. I do know someone here was making one with these features a few years back.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 10:16 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextIn Germany, we were issued the manuals to install ERA to our A3s, but went to M1A1s instead (1989). I think 2ID in Korea was supposed to add it as well because the ERA manuals had an adjustment to accommodate the loader's machine gun present on their A3s.
I've never seen any reference to loader's MG on US Army A3's. I assume this was a pintle-mounted M60? Any pics of this, I'm really interested.
Not my photographs, they are Toadman's, but this is an old 2ID M60A3TTS tank with the mounts. They were specific to 2ID tanks. The loader could relocate the M60D from the side pintle to the forward pintle. They were removed from M48A5s and welded onto the A3s.
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 01:18 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextQuoted TextIn Germany, we were issued the manuals to install ERA to our A3s, but went to M1A1s instead (1989). I think 2ID in Korea was supposed to add it as well because the ERA manuals had an adjustment to accommodate the loader's machine gun present on their A3s.
I've never seen any reference to loader's MG on US Army A3's. I assume this was a pintle-mounted M60? Any pics of this, I'm really interested.
Not my photographs, they are Toadman's, but this is an old 2ID M60A3TTS tank with the mounts. They were specific to 2ID tanks. The loader could relocate the M60D from the side pintle to the forward pintle. They were removed from M48A5s and welded onto the A3s.
WOW!!! Was this vehicle parked in the ocean for a while..?
Glad that you posted these photos to get an idea of where the MG Pintle Mounts on 2ID's M60A3TTS' are located...
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 01:35 PM UTC
Sun baked paint. It was so bad that the denim rags over the mg mounts look to have disintegrated.
Is it my tired eyes or has the paint worn off the front to expose a white bumper number?
Is it my tired eyes or has the paint worn off the front to expose a white bumper number?
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 07:16 PM UTC
Quoted Text
WOW!!! Was this vehicle parked in the ocean for a while..?
Glad that you posted these photos to get an idea of where the MG Pintle Mounts on 2ID's M60A3TTS' are located...
A lot of people say the M60A3 in US service never had these machine guns. It was just the two tank battalions and maybe the div cav squadron. Picture is worth a thousand words. It was probably destined to be a coral reef. The small canvas cover was to keep snow and ice from forming inside the pintle. The pintles originally had a small cap plug on a chain length but must have been lost.
pmontero
Las Palmas, Spain / España
Joined: September 05, 2016
KitMaker: 29 posts
Armorama: 18 posts
Joined: September 05, 2016
KitMaker: 29 posts
Armorama: 18 posts
Posted: Monday, October 03, 2016 - 08:03 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextQuoted TextIn Germany, we were issued the manuals to install ERA to our A3s, but went to M1A1s instead (1989). I think 2ID in Korea was supposed to add it as well because the ERA manuals had an adjustment to accommodate the loader's machine gun present on their A3s.
I've never seen any reference to loader's MG on US Army A3's. I assume this was a pintle-mounted M60? Any pics of this, I'm really interested.
2ID M60A3TTS tanks removed the two mounts from the loader's position on their M48A5s when they transitioned. One is located forward of the loader's hatch in a simple pintle mount and the other is the dog legged one on the side of the turret. That mount requires modification of the standard ERA set up. The M60D is used and moved from the side to the forward position as needed.
One of my face book friends has some photos of his tank, I'll ask to forward some. I do know someone here was making one with these features a few years back.
Here is the complete thread:
https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/238566&page=1