![](../../../i328.photobucket.com/albums/l327/berwickj/Long---Tom/001_1_zps6m1a5yho.jpg)
It's in the same gallery as this one, so I assume it's WWII:
![](../../../i328.photobucket.com/albums/l327/berwickj/Long---Tom/111_111_zpsk2mcix66.jpg)
It was in this gallery:
278FABn
John
I think the issue is less with the tyre design than with the hubs. I recall reading somewhere that the wartime ones had a different number of holes. There are lots of instances of wide variety among the fitted tyres, highway ones being more common than mud types.
Since trailers and artillery didn't require traction, civilian pattern tread were standard for all US towed equipment (including artillery) during WWII (exception might be the 240mm gun).
Quoted TextSince trailers and artillery didn't require traction, civilian pattern tread were standard for all US towed equipment (including artillery) during WWII (exception might be the 240mm gun).
That's not correct.
- Combat MS tires were standard but Combat or standard construction HW tires were used as expedients. Eventually HW tires were superseded by MS tires to conserve rubber and reduce the number of tires in service. See the Notes on Usage section here.
- The 240mm howitzer and 8-inch gun wagons used earthmover tires that did not have the same designations or tread types as smaller tires. There was no "military" tread in this size.
- The US did not develop or field a 240mm gun during WW II.
- Take note of the original posters distinction between tires and wheels.
Hope that helps,
KL
KL
![]() |