Quick follow-up on my earlier post. Waiting on my shelter box to arrive, but made some progress on the truck. As you can see from the picture, I have zero photography skills - can't be sure what the truck colors are, I'm guessing it was still in MERDC (1985). I do remember the right door was a solid mismatched green and the shelter was solid green as well.
I don't think I'll be attempting to scratch the shelter interior
Hosted by Darren Baker
M35A2 Shelter Truck
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Friday, December 30, 2016 - 11:33 PM UTC
thathaway3
Michigan, United States
Joined: September 10, 2004
KitMaker: 1,610 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Joined: September 10, 2004
KitMaker: 1,610 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 31, 2016 - 09:32 AM UTC
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 31, 2016 - 09:50 AM UTC
Those are both really good. Especially partial to the FDC setup under the track extension.
thathaway3
Michigan, United States
Joined: September 10, 2004
KitMaker: 1,610 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Joined: September 10, 2004
KitMaker: 1,610 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 01, 2017 - 01:49 AM UTC
Thanks. This represents the doctrine in place when I ran my FDC. Instead of two charts, one primary and the other to check, we had one chart and "Freddie" FADAC. Which was "primary" and which was the "check" was always an interesting question. We observed that in MOST cases, the "charts and darts" method was usually faster in obtaining initial firing data, but on subsequent corrections, which were usually a lateral shift, the FADAC was faster. Had to do with how it calculated the data in each case.
That FADAC is scratch built, so I'm betting you can do the interior on yours!
That FADAC is scratch built, so I'm betting you can do the interior on yours!
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 01, 2017 - 08:58 AM UTC
Fish, where you with the 59th ORD BD?
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 01, 2017 - 10:31 AM UTC
Yes. 7th FA Det, 557th FA Gp. 84-87.
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 01, 2017 - 12:18 PM UTC
Fish,
I was with 563rd ORD Co. from 90' to 93'
I was with 563rd ORD Co. from 90' to 93'
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 01, 2017 - 08:07 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Fish,
I was with 563rd ORD Co. from 90' to 93'
Wiesbaden right?? We deactivated in 92. The site is now mostly torn down or vandalized.
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Monday, January 02, 2017 - 04:33 AM UTC
Correct Fish.
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 18, 2017 - 02:59 AM UTC