Hosted by Darren Baker
Gruppe Ferhmann question
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2017 - 06:57 AM UTC
Is it known if Tiger F13 had it's onboard tools? I can't tell from the pictures and couldn't find anything googling. if it isn't know, what would be the best guess? Thanks
PanzerKarl
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Joined: April 20, 2004
KitMaker: 2,439 posts
Armorama: 1,980 posts
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2017 - 12:49 PM UTC
I can't see any tools from the photos,whether they were attached before it was knocked out I don't know.
My guess is it never had any tools as missing stowage bin,no track cables or tow cables and no barrel rods.
So I would play safe and leave tools off but just add the tools brackets.
Or pick another Tiger
My guess is it never had any tools as missing stowage bin,no track cables or tow cables and no barrel rods.
So I would play safe and leave tools off but just add the tools brackets.
Or pick another Tiger
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2017 - 03:29 PM UTC
What about splitting the difference ? Just keep the gun cleaning rods and the hand-start crank for instance :
http://docslide.us/documents/afv-modeller-issue-18-2-tiger-f13.html
H.P.
http://docslide.us/documents/afv-modeller-issue-18-2-tiger-f13.html
H.P.
EdmondDantes
Hainaut, Belgium
Joined: April 08, 2017
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Joined: April 08, 2017
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Posted: Friday, April 07, 2017 - 07:00 PM UTC
Hi
I've got the french Steel masters nbr 144 which presents the F13 made by Frédérik Astier.
I will translate for you a part that should answer your question:
"For this project we chose to represent the tank F13 which is very attractive by its bare look. The 3 only known pictures of the tank (taken in June 1946, that is to say more than a year after the events) show a quite worn/used tank whithout any tools, towing cables or mudguards (front, back, side). It does'nt have its turret trunk either. Every supposition is possible as for knowing if these parts have been looted after its destruction, destroyed during combat or never installed."
Best regards
I've got the french Steel masters nbr 144 which presents the F13 made by Frédérik Astier.
I will translate for you a part that should answer your question:
"For this project we chose to represent the tank F13 which is very attractive by its bare look. The 3 only known pictures of the tank (taken in June 1946, that is to say more than a year after the events) show a quite worn/used tank whithout any tools, towing cables or mudguards (front, back, side). It does'nt have its turret trunk either. Every supposition is possible as for knowing if these parts have been looted after its destruction, destroyed during combat or never installed."
Best regards
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Monday, April 10, 2017 - 07:24 AM UTC
thank you guys. I think I'll go with most tools missing, like suggested.
Sleepwalker71
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: August 30, 2012
KitMaker: 265 posts
Armorama: 186 posts
Joined: August 30, 2012
KitMaker: 265 posts
Armorama: 186 posts
Posted: Monday, April 10, 2017 - 07:33 AM UTC
It is quite common that damaged/destroyed tanks were stripped from any useful tools by locals - especially pioneer tools. Therefore no surprise that in 1946 tank was missing them.
EdmondDantes
Hainaut, Belgium
Joined: April 08, 2017
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Joined: April 08, 2017
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Posted: Monday, April 10, 2017 - 11:09 PM UTC
I think that you can go as you like since you cannot go wrong. Any option is plausible!