I've done a fair bit of research into the differences between Pz.kpfw.II ausf.A/B/C and I have struggled. Does anyone know the main differences, particularly the visual differences? Are there any good reference pictures that show these differences? I am asking because I have just received the DML 1/35 pz.kpfw.II ausf.A w/interior and I am hoping to convert it to the ausf.b during the 1939 polish campaing.
Having said that, the reason that I am looking to convert it is because I can find any definitive pictures of the ausf.A during the Polish campaign and so I don't have any realistic turret numbers to use on my model. If anyone has any pictures of the ausf.A during that campaign please share them with me, it would be a great help!
Hosted by Darren Baker
Differences between Panzer II Ausf. A, B, C
andyspencer4077
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2017
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Joined: April 20, 2017
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 10:59 AM UTC
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 11:50 AM UTC
You need Panzer Tracts 2-1, which has all you request.
There were no major changes from A to B but as usual, various changes were introduced during the production run or backfitted later. Examples of the former include adding bullet deflectors, vision ports changed, reinforcing rod across rear hull, angle iron across rear hull and dropping the AA mount. After completion additional armour was fitted to the hull front and a commander's cupola added.
The C had different vision ports again, with hull armour and cupola backfitted later. No other major changes from the B however.
Given this, the vision ports seem to be the best differentiator and a drawing shows the eight different types and the versions in which they appeared. There are also drawings of the various versions, photos printed half page with decent captions and production and unit allocation data. Marked price is USD25.95 on my copy.
There were no major changes from A to B but as usual, various changes were introduced during the production run or backfitted later. Examples of the former include adding bullet deflectors, vision ports changed, reinforcing rod across rear hull, angle iron across rear hull and dropping the AA mount. After completion additional armour was fitted to the hull front and a commander's cupola added.
The C had different vision ports again, with hull armour and cupola backfitted later. No other major changes from the B however.
Given this, the vision ports seem to be the best differentiator and a drawing shows the eight different types and the versions in which they appeared. There are also drawings of the various versions, photos printed half page with decent captions and production and unit allocation data. Marked price is USD25.95 on my copy.
MrCompletely
Saitama-ken, Japan / 日本
Joined: February 12, 2016
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Joined: February 12, 2016
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 12:03 PM UTC
It also depends on if you're talking about a,b,c or A,B, C.
petbat
Queensland, Australia
Joined: August 06, 2005
KitMaker: 3,353 posts
Armorama: 3,121 posts
Joined: August 06, 2005
KitMaker: 3,353 posts
Armorama: 3,121 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 12:50 PM UTC
Quoted Text
It also depends on if you're talking about a,b,c or A,B, C.
Not really as the DML kit in question rules out the so called 'pre-production types' as an option.
andyspencer4077
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: April 20, 2017
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Joined: April 20, 2017
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 01:04 PM UTC
It sounds like there are a lot of minor changes that I'll struggle to replicate and seeing I'm going for realism I think my best bet is to continue to search for an Ausf.A in Poland. That book would be brilliant but I don't have the money to purchase it at the moment unfortunately. Been off work for 5 weeks with a fractured ankle.
I believe that I am talking about A/B/C rather than a/b/c because the kit itself is Ausf.A but this is my first Panzer II model and I'm still trying to learn about it so I could easily be wrong.
I believe that I am talking about A/B/C rather than a/b/c because the kit itself is Ausf.A but this is my first Panzer II model and I'm still trying to learn about it so I could easily be wrong.
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 04:12 PM UTC
There were both c and B models in Poland so it is a reasonable bet that there were also A models. Sometimes a lack of photographs can be helpful for modelling as it makes it hard to be proved wrong...
Turret markings on Pz II in Poland are commonly limited to large white crosses, so no need to worry about numbers.
Turret markings on Pz II in Poland are commonly limited to large white crosses, so no need to worry about numbers.
Removed by original poster on 04/21/17 - 13:38:00 (GMT).
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 20, 2017 - 08:31 PM UTC
"Two destroyed Pz Kpfw II Ausf. A, with a Pz Kpfw IV in the background, in Sochaczew, Poland, 1939 (1. Panzer-Division)"* :
* the caption is not mine
H.P.
* the caption is not mine
H.P.
Removed by original poster on 04/22/17 - 10:26:56 (GMT).